Cargando…

Impact of a right ventricular impedance sensor on the cardiovascular responses to exercise in pacemaker dependent patients

BACKGROUND: The evaluation of the heart rate (HR) response to exercise is important for the assessment of the rate response algorithm of sensor-controlled pacemakers. This study examined the effects of a right ventricular impedance sensor driven pacemaker on the cardiovascular responses to increment...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cook, Linnea, Tomczak, Corey, Busse, Edward, Tsang, John, Wojcik, Wladyslaw, Haennel, Robert
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Group 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1431590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16943865
_version_ 1782127212080660480
author Cook, Linnea
Tomczak, Corey
Busse, Edward
Tsang, John
Wojcik, Wladyslaw
Haennel, Robert
author_facet Cook, Linnea
Tomczak, Corey
Busse, Edward
Tsang, John
Wojcik, Wladyslaw
Haennel, Robert
author_sort Cook, Linnea
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The evaluation of the heart rate (HR) response to exercise is important for the assessment of the rate response algorithm of sensor-controlled pacemakers. This study examined the effects of a right ventricular impedance sensor driven pacemaker on the cardiovascular responses to incremental exercise in pacemaker dependent patients. METHODS: Twelve patients (70.5 ± 9.5 years; 5 Females: 7 Males) implanted with an Inos (2+) closed loop stimulation (CLS) pacemaker were compared to 12 healthy age and sex matched controls (70.6 ± 4.8 years). All subjects performed the chronotropic assessment exercise protocol (CAEP). Variables of interest included HR, cardiac output (Q), oxygen uptake (Vo(2)) and blood pressure (BP). Data were analyzed at rest, throughout exercise and during recovery. Furthermore, patient chronotropic responses were compared to a reference chronotropic response slope for aerobic exercise. RESULTS: There were no differences between groups for HR or Q response throughout exercise. At peak exercise, Vo(2) (mL.kg(-1).min(-1)) was higher for the controls (p < 0.05). The patient chronotropic response slope was comparable to the CAEP reference slope from rest to both the anaerobic threshold (AT) and peak exercise. During recovery, no differences were observed between the groups for any parameters or for the HR decay slopes. CONCLUSION: Up to the anaerobic threshold, the right ventricular impedance sensor driven pacemaker delivered a pacing rate that contributed to an overall cardiovascular response similar to that observed in healthy age matched subjects.
format Text
id pubmed-1431590
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-14315902006-08-29 Impact of a right ventricular impedance sensor on the cardiovascular responses to exercise in pacemaker dependent patients Cook, Linnea Tomczak, Corey Busse, Edward Tsang, John Wojcik, Wladyslaw Haennel, Robert Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J Original Article BACKGROUND: The evaluation of the heart rate (HR) response to exercise is important for the assessment of the rate response algorithm of sensor-controlled pacemakers. This study examined the effects of a right ventricular impedance sensor driven pacemaker on the cardiovascular responses to incremental exercise in pacemaker dependent patients. METHODS: Twelve patients (70.5 ± 9.5 years; 5 Females: 7 Males) implanted with an Inos (2+) closed loop stimulation (CLS) pacemaker were compared to 12 healthy age and sex matched controls (70.6 ± 4.8 years). All subjects performed the chronotropic assessment exercise protocol (CAEP). Variables of interest included HR, cardiac output (Q), oxygen uptake (Vo(2)) and blood pressure (BP). Data were analyzed at rest, throughout exercise and during recovery. Furthermore, patient chronotropic responses were compared to a reference chronotropic response slope for aerobic exercise. RESULTS: There were no differences between groups for HR or Q response throughout exercise. At peak exercise, Vo(2) (mL.kg(-1).min(-1)) was higher for the controls (p < 0.05). The patient chronotropic response slope was comparable to the CAEP reference slope from rest to both the anaerobic threshold (AT) and peak exercise. During recovery, no differences were observed between the groups for any parameters or for the HR decay slopes. CONCLUSION: Up to the anaerobic threshold, the right ventricular impedance sensor driven pacemaker delivered a pacing rate that contributed to an overall cardiovascular response similar to that observed in healthy age matched subjects. Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Group 2005-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC1431590/ /pubmed/16943865 Text en Copyright: © 2005 Cook et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Cook, Linnea
Tomczak, Corey
Busse, Edward
Tsang, John
Wojcik, Wladyslaw
Haennel, Robert
Impact of a right ventricular impedance sensor on the cardiovascular responses to exercise in pacemaker dependent patients
title Impact of a right ventricular impedance sensor on the cardiovascular responses to exercise in pacemaker dependent patients
title_full Impact of a right ventricular impedance sensor on the cardiovascular responses to exercise in pacemaker dependent patients
title_fullStr Impact of a right ventricular impedance sensor on the cardiovascular responses to exercise in pacemaker dependent patients
title_full_unstemmed Impact of a right ventricular impedance sensor on the cardiovascular responses to exercise in pacemaker dependent patients
title_short Impact of a right ventricular impedance sensor on the cardiovascular responses to exercise in pacemaker dependent patients
title_sort impact of a right ventricular impedance sensor on the cardiovascular responses to exercise in pacemaker dependent patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1431590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16943865
work_keys_str_mv AT cooklinnea impactofarightventricularimpedancesensoronthecardiovascularresponsestoexerciseinpacemakerdependentpatients
AT tomczakcorey impactofarightventricularimpedancesensoronthecardiovascularresponsestoexerciseinpacemakerdependentpatients
AT busseedward impactofarightventricularimpedancesensoronthecardiovascularresponsestoexerciseinpacemakerdependentpatients
AT tsangjohn impactofarightventricularimpedancesensoronthecardiovascularresponsestoexerciseinpacemakerdependentpatients
AT wojcikwladyslaw impactofarightventricularimpedancesensoronthecardiovascularresponsestoexerciseinpacemakerdependentpatients
AT haennelrobert impactofarightventricularimpedancesensoronthecardiovascularresponsestoexerciseinpacemakerdependentpatients