Cargando…

Incidence and prevalence of upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders. A systematic appraisal of the literature

BACKGROUND: A systematic appraisal of the worldwide incidence and prevalence rates of UEDs available in scientific literature was executed to gauge the range of these estimates in various countries and to determine whether the rates are increasing in time. METHODS: Studies that recruited at least 50...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huisstede, Bionka MA, Bierma-Zeinstra, Sita MA, Koes, Bart W, Verhaar, Jan AN
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1434740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16448572
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-7-7
_version_ 1782127243481317376
author Huisstede, Bionka MA
Bierma-Zeinstra, Sita MA
Koes, Bart W
Verhaar, Jan AN
author_facet Huisstede, Bionka MA
Bierma-Zeinstra, Sita MA
Koes, Bart W
Verhaar, Jan AN
author_sort Huisstede, Bionka MA
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A systematic appraisal of the worldwide incidence and prevalence rates of UEDs available in scientific literature was executed to gauge the range of these estimates in various countries and to determine whether the rates are increasing in time. METHODS: Studies that recruited at least 500 people, collected data by using questionnaires, interviews and/or physical examinations, and reported incidence or prevalence rates of the whole upper-extremity including neck, were included. RESULTS: No studies were found with regard to the incidence of UEDs and 13 studies that reported prevalence rates of UEDs were included. The point prevalence ranged from 1.6–53%; the 12-months prevalence ranged from 2.3–41%. One study reported on the lifetime prevalence (29%). We did not find evidence of a clear increasing or decreasing pattern over time. The case definitions for UEDs used in the studies, differed enormously. Therefore, it was not possible to pool the data. CONCLUSION: There are substantial differences in reported prevalence rates on UEDs. Main reason for this is the absence of a universally accepted way of labelling or defining UEDs. If we want to make progress in this field, the first requirement is to agree on unambiguous terminology and classification of EUDs.
format Text
id pubmed-1434740
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-14347402006-04-08 Incidence and prevalence of upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders. A systematic appraisal of the literature Huisstede, Bionka MA Bierma-Zeinstra, Sita MA Koes, Bart W Verhaar, Jan AN BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: A systematic appraisal of the worldwide incidence and prevalence rates of UEDs available in scientific literature was executed to gauge the range of these estimates in various countries and to determine whether the rates are increasing in time. METHODS: Studies that recruited at least 500 people, collected data by using questionnaires, interviews and/or physical examinations, and reported incidence or prevalence rates of the whole upper-extremity including neck, were included. RESULTS: No studies were found with regard to the incidence of UEDs and 13 studies that reported prevalence rates of UEDs were included. The point prevalence ranged from 1.6–53%; the 12-months prevalence ranged from 2.3–41%. One study reported on the lifetime prevalence (29%). We did not find evidence of a clear increasing or decreasing pattern over time. The case definitions for UEDs used in the studies, differed enormously. Therefore, it was not possible to pool the data. CONCLUSION: There are substantial differences in reported prevalence rates on UEDs. Main reason for this is the absence of a universally accepted way of labelling or defining UEDs. If we want to make progress in this field, the first requirement is to agree on unambiguous terminology and classification of EUDs. BioMed Central 2006-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC1434740/ /pubmed/16448572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-7-7 Text en Copyright © 2006 Huisstede et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
spellingShingle Research Article
Huisstede, Bionka MA
Bierma-Zeinstra, Sita MA
Koes, Bart W
Verhaar, Jan AN
Incidence and prevalence of upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders. A systematic appraisal of the literature
title Incidence and prevalence of upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders. A systematic appraisal of the literature
title_full Incidence and prevalence of upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders. A systematic appraisal of the literature
title_fullStr Incidence and prevalence of upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders. A systematic appraisal of the literature
title_full_unstemmed Incidence and prevalence of upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders. A systematic appraisal of the literature
title_short Incidence and prevalence of upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders. A systematic appraisal of the literature
title_sort incidence and prevalence of upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders. a systematic appraisal of the literature
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1434740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16448572
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-7-7
work_keys_str_mv AT huisstedebionkama incidenceandprevalenceofupperextremitymusculoskeletaldisordersasystematicappraisaloftheliterature
AT biermazeinstrasitama incidenceandprevalenceofupperextremitymusculoskeletaldisordersasystematicappraisaloftheliterature
AT koesbartw incidenceandprevalenceofupperextremitymusculoskeletaldisordersasystematicappraisaloftheliterature
AT verhaarjanan incidenceandprevalenceofupperextremitymusculoskeletaldisordersasystematicappraisaloftheliterature