Cargando…

Revision of visual impairment definitions in the International Statistical Classification of Diseases

BACKGROUND: The existing definitions of visual impairment in the International Statistical Classification of Diseases are based on recommendations made over 30 years ago. New data and knowledge related to visual impairment that have accumulated over this period suggest that these definitions need to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dandona, Lalit, Dandona, Rakhi
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1435919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16539739
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-4-7
_version_ 1782127294888804352
author Dandona, Lalit
Dandona, Rakhi
author_facet Dandona, Lalit
Dandona, Rakhi
author_sort Dandona, Lalit
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The existing definitions of visual impairment in the International Statistical Classification of Diseases are based on recommendations made over 30 years ago. New data and knowledge related to visual impairment that have accumulated over this period suggest that these definitions need to be revised. DISCUSSION: Three major issues need to be addressed in the revision of these definitions. First, the existing definitions are based on best-corrected visual acuity, which exclude uncorrected refractive error as a cause of visual impairment, leading to substantial underestimation of the total visual impairment burden by about 38%. Second, the cut-off level of visual impairment to define blindness in the International Statistical Classification of Diseases is visual acuity less than 3/60 in the better eye, but with increasing human development the visual acuity requirements are also increasing, suggesting that a level less than 6/60 be used to define blindness. Third, the International Statistical Classification of Diseases uses the term 'low vision' for visual impairment level less than blindness, which causes confusion with the common use of this term for uncorrectable vision requiring aids or rehabilitation, suggesting that alternative terms such as moderate and mild visual impairment would be more appropriate for visual impairment less severe than blindness. We propose a revision of the definitions of visual impairment in the International Statistical Classification of Diseases that addresses these three issues. According to these revised definitions, the number of blind persons in the world defined as presenting visual acuity less than 6/60 in the better eye would be about 57 million as compared with the World Health Organization estimate of 37 million using the existing International Statistical Classification of Diseases definition of best-corrected visual acuity less than 3/60 in the better eye, and the number of persons in the world with moderate visual impairment defined as presenting visual acuity less than 6/18 to 6/60 in the better eye would be about 202 million as compared with the World Health Organization estimate of 124 million persons with low vision defined as best-corrected visual acuity less than 6/18 to 3/60 in the better eye. CONCLUSION: Our suggested revision of the visual impairment definitions in the International Statistical Classification of Diseases takes into account advances in the understanding of visual impairment. This revised classification seems more appropriate for estimating and tracking visual impairment in the countries and regions of the world than the existing classification in the International Statistical Classification of Diseases.
format Text
id pubmed-1435919
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-14359192006-04-14 Revision of visual impairment definitions in the International Statistical Classification of Diseases Dandona, Lalit Dandona, Rakhi BMC Med Debate BACKGROUND: The existing definitions of visual impairment in the International Statistical Classification of Diseases are based on recommendations made over 30 years ago. New data and knowledge related to visual impairment that have accumulated over this period suggest that these definitions need to be revised. DISCUSSION: Three major issues need to be addressed in the revision of these definitions. First, the existing definitions are based on best-corrected visual acuity, which exclude uncorrected refractive error as a cause of visual impairment, leading to substantial underestimation of the total visual impairment burden by about 38%. Second, the cut-off level of visual impairment to define blindness in the International Statistical Classification of Diseases is visual acuity less than 3/60 in the better eye, but with increasing human development the visual acuity requirements are also increasing, suggesting that a level less than 6/60 be used to define blindness. Third, the International Statistical Classification of Diseases uses the term 'low vision' for visual impairment level less than blindness, which causes confusion with the common use of this term for uncorrectable vision requiring aids or rehabilitation, suggesting that alternative terms such as moderate and mild visual impairment would be more appropriate for visual impairment less severe than blindness. We propose a revision of the definitions of visual impairment in the International Statistical Classification of Diseases that addresses these three issues. According to these revised definitions, the number of blind persons in the world defined as presenting visual acuity less than 6/60 in the better eye would be about 57 million as compared with the World Health Organization estimate of 37 million using the existing International Statistical Classification of Diseases definition of best-corrected visual acuity less than 3/60 in the better eye, and the number of persons in the world with moderate visual impairment defined as presenting visual acuity less than 6/18 to 6/60 in the better eye would be about 202 million as compared with the World Health Organization estimate of 124 million persons with low vision defined as best-corrected visual acuity less than 6/18 to 3/60 in the better eye. CONCLUSION: Our suggested revision of the visual impairment definitions in the International Statistical Classification of Diseases takes into account advances in the understanding of visual impairment. This revised classification seems more appropriate for estimating and tracking visual impairment in the countries and regions of the world than the existing classification in the International Statistical Classification of Diseases. BioMed Central 2006-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC1435919/ /pubmed/16539739 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-4-7 Text en Copyright © 2006 Dandona and Dandona; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
spellingShingle Debate
Dandona, Lalit
Dandona, Rakhi
Revision of visual impairment definitions in the International Statistical Classification of Diseases
title Revision of visual impairment definitions in the International Statistical Classification of Diseases
title_full Revision of visual impairment definitions in the International Statistical Classification of Diseases
title_fullStr Revision of visual impairment definitions in the International Statistical Classification of Diseases
title_full_unstemmed Revision of visual impairment definitions in the International Statistical Classification of Diseases
title_short Revision of visual impairment definitions in the International Statistical Classification of Diseases
title_sort revision of visual impairment definitions in the international statistical classification of diseases
topic Debate
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1435919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16539739
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-4-7
work_keys_str_mv AT dandonalalit revisionofvisualimpairmentdefinitionsintheinternationalstatisticalclassificationofdiseases
AT dandonarakhi revisionofvisualimpairmentdefinitionsintheinternationalstatisticalclassificationofdiseases