Cargando…

Head repositioning errors in normal student volunteers: a possible tool to assess the neck's neuromuscular system

BACKGROUND: A challenge for practitioners using spinal manipulation is identifying when an intervention is required. It has been recognized that joint pain can interfere with the ability to position body parts accurately and that the recent history of muscle contraction can play a part in that inter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Owens, Edward F, Henderson, Charles NR, Gudavalli, M Ram, Pickar, Joel G
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1450294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16519811
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-1340-14-5
_version_ 1782127390752768000
author Owens, Edward F
Henderson, Charles NR
Gudavalli, M Ram
Pickar, Joel G
author_facet Owens, Edward F
Henderson, Charles NR
Gudavalli, M Ram
Pickar, Joel G
author_sort Owens, Edward F
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A challenge for practitioners using spinal manipulation is identifying when an intervention is required. It has been recognized that joint pain can interfere with the ability to position body parts accurately and that the recent history of muscle contraction can play a part in that interference. In this study, we tested whether repositioning errors could be induced in a normal population by contraction or shortening of the neck muscles. METHODS: In the experimental protocol, volunteers free of neck problems first found a comfortable neutral head posture with eyes closed. They deconditioned their cervical muscles by moving their heads 5 times in either flexion/extension or lateral flexion and then attempted to return to the same starting position. Two conditioning sequences were interspersed within the task: hold the head in an extended or laterally flexed position for 10 seconds; or hold a 70% maximum voluntary contraction in the same position for 10 seconds. A computer-interfaced electrogoniometer was used to measure head position while a force transducer coupled to an auditory alarm signaled the force of isometric contraction. The difference between the initial and final head orientation was calculated in 3 orthogonal planes. Analysis of variance (1-way ANOVA) with a blocking factor (participants) was used to detect differences in proprioceptive error among the conditioning sequences while controlling for variation between participants. RESULTS: Forty-eight chiropractic students participated: 36 males and 12 females, aged 28.2 ± 4.8 yrs. During the neck extension test, actively contracting the posterior neck muscles evoked an undershoot of the target position by 2.1° (p <0.001). No differences in repositioning were found during the lateral flexion test. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the recent history of cervical paraspinal muscle contraction can influence head repositioning in flexion/extension. To our knowledge this is the first time that muscle mechanical history has been shown to influence proprioceptive accuracy in the necks of humans. This finding may be used to elucidate the mechanism behind repositioning errors seen in people with neck pain and could guide development of a clinical test for involvement of paraspinal muscles in cervical pain and dysfunction.
format Text
id pubmed-1450294
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-14502942006-04-29 Head repositioning errors in normal student volunteers: a possible tool to assess the neck's neuromuscular system Owens, Edward F Henderson, Charles NR Gudavalli, M Ram Pickar, Joel G Chiropr Osteopat Research BACKGROUND: A challenge for practitioners using spinal manipulation is identifying when an intervention is required. It has been recognized that joint pain can interfere with the ability to position body parts accurately and that the recent history of muscle contraction can play a part in that interference. In this study, we tested whether repositioning errors could be induced in a normal population by contraction or shortening of the neck muscles. METHODS: In the experimental protocol, volunteers free of neck problems first found a comfortable neutral head posture with eyes closed. They deconditioned their cervical muscles by moving their heads 5 times in either flexion/extension or lateral flexion and then attempted to return to the same starting position. Two conditioning sequences were interspersed within the task: hold the head in an extended or laterally flexed position for 10 seconds; or hold a 70% maximum voluntary contraction in the same position for 10 seconds. A computer-interfaced electrogoniometer was used to measure head position while a force transducer coupled to an auditory alarm signaled the force of isometric contraction. The difference between the initial and final head orientation was calculated in 3 orthogonal planes. Analysis of variance (1-way ANOVA) with a blocking factor (participants) was used to detect differences in proprioceptive error among the conditioning sequences while controlling for variation between participants. RESULTS: Forty-eight chiropractic students participated: 36 males and 12 females, aged 28.2 ± 4.8 yrs. During the neck extension test, actively contracting the posterior neck muscles evoked an undershoot of the target position by 2.1° (p <0.001). No differences in repositioning were found during the lateral flexion test. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the recent history of cervical paraspinal muscle contraction can influence head repositioning in flexion/extension. To our knowledge this is the first time that muscle mechanical history has been shown to influence proprioceptive accuracy in the necks of humans. This finding may be used to elucidate the mechanism behind repositioning errors seen in people with neck pain and could guide development of a clinical test for involvement of paraspinal muscles in cervical pain and dysfunction. BioMed Central 2006-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC1450294/ /pubmed/16519811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-1340-14-5 Text en Copyright © 2006 Owens et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
spellingShingle Research
Owens, Edward F
Henderson, Charles NR
Gudavalli, M Ram
Pickar, Joel G
Head repositioning errors in normal student volunteers: a possible tool to assess the neck's neuromuscular system
title Head repositioning errors in normal student volunteers: a possible tool to assess the neck's neuromuscular system
title_full Head repositioning errors in normal student volunteers: a possible tool to assess the neck's neuromuscular system
title_fullStr Head repositioning errors in normal student volunteers: a possible tool to assess the neck's neuromuscular system
title_full_unstemmed Head repositioning errors in normal student volunteers: a possible tool to assess the neck's neuromuscular system
title_short Head repositioning errors in normal student volunteers: a possible tool to assess the neck's neuromuscular system
title_sort head repositioning errors in normal student volunteers: a possible tool to assess the neck's neuromuscular system
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1450294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16519811
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-1340-14-5
work_keys_str_mv AT owensedwardf headrepositioningerrorsinnormalstudentvolunteersapossibletooltoassessthenecksneuromuscularsystem
AT hendersoncharlesnr headrepositioningerrorsinnormalstudentvolunteersapossibletooltoassessthenecksneuromuscularsystem
AT gudavallimram headrepositioningerrorsinnormalstudentvolunteersapossibletooltoassessthenecksneuromuscularsystem
AT pickarjoelg headrepositioningerrorsinnormalstudentvolunteersapossibletooltoassessthenecksneuromuscularsystem