Cargando…

Study on the clinical application of pulsed DC magnetic technology for tracking of intraoperative head motion during frameless stereotaxy

BACKGROUND: Tracking of post-registration head motion is one of the major problems in frameless stereotaxy. Various attempts in detecting and compensating for this phenomenon rely on a fixed reference device rigidly attached to the patient's head. However, most of such reference tools are eithe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Suess, Olaf, Suess, Silke, Mularski, Sven, Kühn, Björn, Picht, Thomas, Hammersen, Stefanie, Stendel, Rüdiger, Brock, Mario, Kombos, Theodoros
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1459123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16640775
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-2-10
_version_ 1782127455937495040
author Suess, Olaf
Suess, Silke
Mularski, Sven
Kühn, Björn
Picht, Thomas
Hammersen, Stefanie
Stendel, Rüdiger
Brock, Mario
Kombos, Theodoros
author_facet Suess, Olaf
Suess, Silke
Mularski, Sven
Kühn, Björn
Picht, Thomas
Hammersen, Stefanie
Stendel, Rüdiger
Brock, Mario
Kombos, Theodoros
author_sort Suess, Olaf
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tracking of post-registration head motion is one of the major problems in frameless stereotaxy. Various attempts in detecting and compensating for this phenomenon rely on a fixed reference device rigidly attached to the patient's head. However, most of such reference tools are either based on an invasive fixation technique or have physical limitations which allow mobility of the head only in a restricted range of motion after completion of the registration procedure. METHODS: A new sensor-based reference tool, the so-called Dynamic Reference Frame (DRF) which is designed to allow an unrestricted, 360° range of motion for the intraoperative use in pulsed DC magnetic navigation was tested in 40 patients. Different methods of non-invasive attachment dependent on the clinical need and type of procedure, as well as the resulting accuracies in the clinical application have been analyzed. RESULTS: Apart from conventional, completely rigid immobilization of the head (type A), four additional modes of head fixation and attachment of the DRF were distinguished on clinical grounds: type B1 = pin fixation plus oral DRF attachment; type B2 = pin fixation plus retroauricular DRF attachment; type C1 = free head positioning with oral DRF; and type C2 = free head positioning with retroauricular DRF. Mean fiducial registration errors (FRE) were as follows: type A interventions = 1.51 mm, B1 = 1.56 mm, B2 = 1.54 mm, C1 = 1.73 mm, and C2 = 1.75 mm. The mean position errors determined at the end of the intervention as a measure of application accuracy were: 1.45 mm in type A interventions, 1.26 mm in type B1, 1.44 mm in type B2, 1.86 mm in type C1, and 1.68 mm in type C2. CONCLUSION: Rigid head immobilization guarantees most reliable accuracy in various types of frameless stereotaxy. The use of an additional DRF, however, increases the application scope of frameless stereotaxy to include e.g. procedures in which rigid pin fixation of the cranium is not required or desired. Thus, continuous tracking of head motion allows highly flexible variation of the surgical strategy including intraoperative repositioning of the patient without impairment of navigational accuracy as it ensures automatic correction of spatial distortion. With a dental cast for oral attachment and the alternative option of non-invasive retroauricular attachment, flexibility in the clinical use of the DRF is ensured.
format Text
id pubmed-1459123
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-14591232006-05-11 Study on the clinical application of pulsed DC magnetic technology for tracking of intraoperative head motion during frameless stereotaxy Suess, Olaf Suess, Silke Mularski, Sven Kühn, Björn Picht, Thomas Hammersen, Stefanie Stendel, Rüdiger Brock, Mario Kombos, Theodoros Head Face Med Research BACKGROUND: Tracking of post-registration head motion is one of the major problems in frameless stereotaxy. Various attempts in detecting and compensating for this phenomenon rely on a fixed reference device rigidly attached to the patient's head. However, most of such reference tools are either based on an invasive fixation technique or have physical limitations which allow mobility of the head only in a restricted range of motion after completion of the registration procedure. METHODS: A new sensor-based reference tool, the so-called Dynamic Reference Frame (DRF) which is designed to allow an unrestricted, 360° range of motion for the intraoperative use in pulsed DC magnetic navigation was tested in 40 patients. Different methods of non-invasive attachment dependent on the clinical need and type of procedure, as well as the resulting accuracies in the clinical application have been analyzed. RESULTS: Apart from conventional, completely rigid immobilization of the head (type A), four additional modes of head fixation and attachment of the DRF were distinguished on clinical grounds: type B1 = pin fixation plus oral DRF attachment; type B2 = pin fixation plus retroauricular DRF attachment; type C1 = free head positioning with oral DRF; and type C2 = free head positioning with retroauricular DRF. Mean fiducial registration errors (FRE) were as follows: type A interventions = 1.51 mm, B1 = 1.56 mm, B2 = 1.54 mm, C1 = 1.73 mm, and C2 = 1.75 mm. The mean position errors determined at the end of the intervention as a measure of application accuracy were: 1.45 mm in type A interventions, 1.26 mm in type B1, 1.44 mm in type B2, 1.86 mm in type C1, and 1.68 mm in type C2. CONCLUSION: Rigid head immobilization guarantees most reliable accuracy in various types of frameless stereotaxy. The use of an additional DRF, however, increases the application scope of frameless stereotaxy to include e.g. procedures in which rigid pin fixation of the cranium is not required or desired. Thus, continuous tracking of head motion allows highly flexible variation of the surgical strategy including intraoperative repositioning of the patient without impairment of navigational accuracy as it ensures automatic correction of spatial distortion. With a dental cast for oral attachment and the alternative option of non-invasive retroauricular attachment, flexibility in the clinical use of the DRF is ensured. BioMed Central 2006-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC1459123/ /pubmed/16640775 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-2-10 Text en Copyright © 2006 Suess et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Suess, Olaf
Suess, Silke
Mularski, Sven
Kühn, Björn
Picht, Thomas
Hammersen, Stefanie
Stendel, Rüdiger
Brock, Mario
Kombos, Theodoros
Study on the clinical application of pulsed DC magnetic technology for tracking of intraoperative head motion during frameless stereotaxy
title Study on the clinical application of pulsed DC magnetic technology for tracking of intraoperative head motion during frameless stereotaxy
title_full Study on the clinical application of pulsed DC magnetic technology for tracking of intraoperative head motion during frameless stereotaxy
title_fullStr Study on the clinical application of pulsed DC magnetic technology for tracking of intraoperative head motion during frameless stereotaxy
title_full_unstemmed Study on the clinical application of pulsed DC magnetic technology for tracking of intraoperative head motion during frameless stereotaxy
title_short Study on the clinical application of pulsed DC magnetic technology for tracking of intraoperative head motion during frameless stereotaxy
title_sort study on the clinical application of pulsed dc magnetic technology for tracking of intraoperative head motion during frameless stereotaxy
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1459123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16640775
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-2-10
work_keys_str_mv AT suessolaf studyontheclinicalapplicationofpulseddcmagnetictechnologyfortrackingofintraoperativeheadmotionduringframelessstereotaxy
AT suesssilke studyontheclinicalapplicationofpulseddcmagnetictechnologyfortrackingofintraoperativeheadmotionduringframelessstereotaxy
AT mularskisven studyontheclinicalapplicationofpulseddcmagnetictechnologyfortrackingofintraoperativeheadmotionduringframelessstereotaxy
AT kuhnbjorn studyontheclinicalapplicationofpulseddcmagnetictechnologyfortrackingofintraoperativeheadmotionduringframelessstereotaxy
AT pichtthomas studyontheclinicalapplicationofpulseddcmagnetictechnologyfortrackingofintraoperativeheadmotionduringframelessstereotaxy
AT hammersenstefanie studyontheclinicalapplicationofpulseddcmagnetictechnologyfortrackingofintraoperativeheadmotionduringframelessstereotaxy
AT stendelrudiger studyontheclinicalapplicationofpulseddcmagnetictechnologyfortrackingofintraoperativeheadmotionduringframelessstereotaxy
AT brockmario studyontheclinicalapplicationofpulseddcmagnetictechnologyfortrackingofintraoperativeheadmotionduringframelessstereotaxy
AT kombostheodoros studyontheclinicalapplicationofpulseddcmagnetictechnologyfortrackingofintraoperativeheadmotionduringframelessstereotaxy