Cargando…

Comparative effectiveness of manipulation, mobilisation and the Activator instrument in treatment of non-specific neck pain: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Neck pain is a common problem and different forms of manual therapy are used in its treatment. The purpose of this systematic review was to critically appraise the literature that directly compared manipulation, mobilisation and the Activator instrument for non-specific neck pain. METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gemmell, Hugh, Miller, Peter
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1459176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16623934
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-1340-14-7
_version_ 1782127469152698368
author Gemmell, Hugh
Miller, Peter
author_facet Gemmell, Hugh
Miller, Peter
author_sort Gemmell, Hugh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Neck pain is a common problem and different forms of manual therapy are used in its treatment. The purpose of this systematic review was to critically appraise the literature that directly compared manipulation, mobilisation and the Activator instrument for non-specific neck pain. METHODS: Electronic databases (MEDLINE, MANTIS and CINAHL) were searched from their inception to October 2005 for all English language randomised clinical trials that directly compared manipulation, mobilisation and the Activator instrument. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to select the studies and these studies were then evaluated using validated criteria. RESULTS: Five such studies were identified. The methodological quality was mostly poor. Findings from the studies were mixed and no one therapy was shown to be more effective than the others. CONCLUSION: Further high quality research has to be done before a recommendation can be made as to the most effective manual method for non-specific neck pain.
format Text
id pubmed-1459176
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-14591762006-05-11 Comparative effectiveness of manipulation, mobilisation and the Activator instrument in treatment of non-specific neck pain: a systematic review Gemmell, Hugh Miller, Peter Chiropr Osteopat Research BACKGROUND: Neck pain is a common problem and different forms of manual therapy are used in its treatment. The purpose of this systematic review was to critically appraise the literature that directly compared manipulation, mobilisation and the Activator instrument for non-specific neck pain. METHODS: Electronic databases (MEDLINE, MANTIS and CINAHL) were searched from their inception to October 2005 for all English language randomised clinical trials that directly compared manipulation, mobilisation and the Activator instrument. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to select the studies and these studies were then evaluated using validated criteria. RESULTS: Five such studies were identified. The methodological quality was mostly poor. Findings from the studies were mixed and no one therapy was shown to be more effective than the others. CONCLUSION: Further high quality research has to be done before a recommendation can be made as to the most effective manual method for non-specific neck pain. BioMed Central 2006-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC1459176/ /pubmed/16623934 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-1340-14-7 Text en Copyright © 2006 Gemmell and Miller; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Gemmell, Hugh
Miller, Peter
Comparative effectiveness of manipulation, mobilisation and the Activator instrument in treatment of non-specific neck pain: a systematic review
title Comparative effectiveness of manipulation, mobilisation and the Activator instrument in treatment of non-specific neck pain: a systematic review
title_full Comparative effectiveness of manipulation, mobilisation and the Activator instrument in treatment of non-specific neck pain: a systematic review
title_fullStr Comparative effectiveness of manipulation, mobilisation and the Activator instrument in treatment of non-specific neck pain: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Comparative effectiveness of manipulation, mobilisation and the Activator instrument in treatment of non-specific neck pain: a systematic review
title_short Comparative effectiveness of manipulation, mobilisation and the Activator instrument in treatment of non-specific neck pain: a systematic review
title_sort comparative effectiveness of manipulation, mobilisation and the activator instrument in treatment of non-specific neck pain: a systematic review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1459176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16623934
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-1340-14-7
work_keys_str_mv AT gemmellhugh comparativeeffectivenessofmanipulationmobilisationandtheactivatorinstrumentintreatmentofnonspecificneckpainasystematicreview
AT millerpeter comparativeeffectivenessofmanipulationmobilisationandtheactivatorinstrumentintreatmentofnonspecificneckpainasystematicreview