Cargando…
Comparative effectiveness of manipulation, mobilisation and the Activator instrument in treatment of non-specific neck pain: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Neck pain is a common problem and different forms of manual therapy are used in its treatment. The purpose of this systematic review was to critically appraise the literature that directly compared manipulation, mobilisation and the Activator instrument for non-specific neck pain. METHOD...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1459176/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16623934 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-1340-14-7 |
_version_ | 1782127469152698368 |
---|---|
author | Gemmell, Hugh Miller, Peter |
author_facet | Gemmell, Hugh Miller, Peter |
author_sort | Gemmell, Hugh |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Neck pain is a common problem and different forms of manual therapy are used in its treatment. The purpose of this systematic review was to critically appraise the literature that directly compared manipulation, mobilisation and the Activator instrument for non-specific neck pain. METHODS: Electronic databases (MEDLINE, MANTIS and CINAHL) were searched from their inception to October 2005 for all English language randomised clinical trials that directly compared manipulation, mobilisation and the Activator instrument. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to select the studies and these studies were then evaluated using validated criteria. RESULTS: Five such studies were identified. The methodological quality was mostly poor. Findings from the studies were mixed and no one therapy was shown to be more effective than the others. CONCLUSION: Further high quality research has to be done before a recommendation can be made as to the most effective manual method for non-specific neck pain. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1459176 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-14591762006-05-11 Comparative effectiveness of manipulation, mobilisation and the Activator instrument in treatment of non-specific neck pain: a systematic review Gemmell, Hugh Miller, Peter Chiropr Osteopat Research BACKGROUND: Neck pain is a common problem and different forms of manual therapy are used in its treatment. The purpose of this systematic review was to critically appraise the literature that directly compared manipulation, mobilisation and the Activator instrument for non-specific neck pain. METHODS: Electronic databases (MEDLINE, MANTIS and CINAHL) were searched from their inception to October 2005 for all English language randomised clinical trials that directly compared manipulation, mobilisation and the Activator instrument. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to select the studies and these studies were then evaluated using validated criteria. RESULTS: Five such studies were identified. The methodological quality was mostly poor. Findings from the studies were mixed and no one therapy was shown to be more effective than the others. CONCLUSION: Further high quality research has to be done before a recommendation can be made as to the most effective manual method for non-specific neck pain. BioMed Central 2006-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC1459176/ /pubmed/16623934 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-1340-14-7 Text en Copyright © 2006 Gemmell and Miller; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Gemmell, Hugh Miller, Peter Comparative effectiveness of manipulation, mobilisation and the Activator instrument in treatment of non-specific neck pain: a systematic review |
title | Comparative effectiveness of manipulation, mobilisation and the Activator instrument in treatment of non-specific neck pain: a systematic review |
title_full | Comparative effectiveness of manipulation, mobilisation and the Activator instrument in treatment of non-specific neck pain: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Comparative effectiveness of manipulation, mobilisation and the Activator instrument in treatment of non-specific neck pain: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative effectiveness of manipulation, mobilisation and the Activator instrument in treatment of non-specific neck pain: a systematic review |
title_short | Comparative effectiveness of manipulation, mobilisation and the Activator instrument in treatment of non-specific neck pain: a systematic review |
title_sort | comparative effectiveness of manipulation, mobilisation and the activator instrument in treatment of non-specific neck pain: a systematic review |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1459176/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16623934 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-1340-14-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gemmellhugh comparativeeffectivenessofmanipulationmobilisationandtheactivatorinstrumentintreatmentofnonspecificneckpainasystematicreview AT millerpeter comparativeeffectivenessofmanipulationmobilisationandtheactivatorinstrumentintreatmentofnonspecificneckpainasystematicreview |