Cargando…
Genetic algorithm learning as a robust approach to RNA editing site prediction
BACKGROUND: RNA editing is one of several post-transcriptional modifications that may contribute to organismal complexity in the face of limited gene complement in a genome. One form, known as C → U editing, appears to exist in a wide range of organisms, but most instances of this form of RNA editin...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1459874/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16542417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-145 |
_version_ | 1782127505239441408 |
---|---|
author | Thompson, James Gopal, Shuba |
author_facet | Thompson, James Gopal, Shuba |
author_sort | Thompson, James |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: RNA editing is one of several post-transcriptional modifications that may contribute to organismal complexity in the face of limited gene complement in a genome. One form, known as C → U editing, appears to exist in a wide range of organisms, but most instances of this form of RNA editing have been discovered serendipitously. With the large amount of genomic and transcriptomic data now available, a computational analysis could provide a more rapid means of identifying novel sites of C → U RNA editing. Previous efforts have had some success but also some limitations. We present a computational method for identifying C → U RNA editing sites in genomic sequences that is both robust and generalizable. We evaluate its potential use on the best data set available for these purposes: C → U editing sites in plant mitochondrial genomes. RESULTS: Our method is derived from a machine learning approach known as a genetic algorithm. REGAL (RNA Editing site prediction by Genetic Algorithm Learning) is 87% accurate when tested on three mitochondrial genomes, with an overall sensitivity of 82% and an overall specificity of 91%. REGAL's performance significantly improves on other ab initio approaches to predicting RNA editing sites in this data set. REGAL has a comparable sensitivity and higher specificity than approaches which rely on sequence homology, and it has the advantage that strong sequence conservation is not required for reliable prediction of edit sites. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that ab initio methods can generate robust classifiers of putative edit sites, and we highlight the value of combinatorial approaches as embodied by genetic algorithms. We present REGAL as one approach with the potential to be generalized to other organisms exhibiting C → U RNA editing. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1459874 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-14598742006-05-13 Genetic algorithm learning as a robust approach to RNA editing site prediction Thompson, James Gopal, Shuba BMC Bioinformatics Methodology Article BACKGROUND: RNA editing is one of several post-transcriptional modifications that may contribute to organismal complexity in the face of limited gene complement in a genome. One form, known as C → U editing, appears to exist in a wide range of organisms, but most instances of this form of RNA editing have been discovered serendipitously. With the large amount of genomic and transcriptomic data now available, a computational analysis could provide a more rapid means of identifying novel sites of C → U RNA editing. Previous efforts have had some success but also some limitations. We present a computational method for identifying C → U RNA editing sites in genomic sequences that is both robust and generalizable. We evaluate its potential use on the best data set available for these purposes: C → U editing sites in plant mitochondrial genomes. RESULTS: Our method is derived from a machine learning approach known as a genetic algorithm. REGAL (RNA Editing site prediction by Genetic Algorithm Learning) is 87% accurate when tested on three mitochondrial genomes, with an overall sensitivity of 82% and an overall specificity of 91%. REGAL's performance significantly improves on other ab initio approaches to predicting RNA editing sites in this data set. REGAL has a comparable sensitivity and higher specificity than approaches which rely on sequence homology, and it has the advantage that strong sequence conservation is not required for reliable prediction of edit sites. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that ab initio methods can generate robust classifiers of putative edit sites, and we highlight the value of combinatorial approaches as embodied by genetic algorithms. We present REGAL as one approach with the potential to be generalized to other organisms exhibiting C → U RNA editing. BioMed Central 2006-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC1459874/ /pubmed/16542417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-145 Text en Copyright © 2006 Thompson and Gopal; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Article Thompson, James Gopal, Shuba Genetic algorithm learning as a robust approach to RNA editing site prediction |
title | Genetic algorithm learning as a robust approach to RNA editing site prediction |
title_full | Genetic algorithm learning as a robust approach to RNA editing site prediction |
title_fullStr | Genetic algorithm learning as a robust approach to RNA editing site prediction |
title_full_unstemmed | Genetic algorithm learning as a robust approach to RNA editing site prediction |
title_short | Genetic algorithm learning as a robust approach to RNA editing site prediction |
title_sort | genetic algorithm learning as a robust approach to rna editing site prediction |
topic | Methodology Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1459874/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16542417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-145 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thompsonjames geneticalgorithmlearningasarobustapproachtornaeditingsiteprediction AT gopalshuba geneticalgorithmlearningasarobustapproachtornaeditingsiteprediction |