Cargando…

Vaccination coverage and reasons for non-vaccination in a district of Istanbul

BACKGROUND: In order to control and eliminate the vaccine preventable diseases it is important to know the vaccination coverage and reasons for non-vaccination. The primary objective of this study was to determine the complete vaccination rate; the reasons for non-vaccination and the predictors that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Torun, Sebahat D, Bakırcı, Nadi
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1464125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16677375
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-6-125
_version_ 1782127538445746176
author Torun, Sebahat D
Bakırcı, Nadi
author_facet Torun, Sebahat D
Bakırcı, Nadi
author_sort Torun, Sebahat D
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In order to control and eliminate the vaccine preventable diseases it is important to know the vaccination coverage and reasons for non-vaccination. The primary objective of this study was to determine the complete vaccination rate; the reasons for non-vaccination and the predictors that influence vaccination of children. The other objective was to determine coverage of measles vaccination of the Measles Immunization Days (MID) 2005 for children aged 9 month to 6 years in a region of Umraniye, Istanbul, Turkey. METHODS: A '30 × 7' cluster sampling design was used as the sampling method. Thirty streets were selected at random from study area. Survey data were collected by a questionnaire which was applied face to face to parents of 221 children. A Chi-square test and logistic regression was used for the statistical analyses. Content analysis method was used to evaluate the open-ended questions. RESULTS: The complete vaccination rate for study population was 84.5% and 3.2% of all children were totally non-vaccinated. The siblings of non-vaccinated children were also non-vaccinated. Reasons for non-vaccination were as follows: being in the village and couldn't reach to health care services; having no knowledge about vaccination; the father of child didn't allow vaccination; intercurrent illness of child during vaccination time; missed opportunities like not to shave off a vial for only one child. In logistic regression analysis, paternal and maternal levels of education and immigration time of both parents to Istanbul were found to influence whether children were completely vaccinated or non-vaccinated. Measles vaccination coverage during MID was 79.3%. CONCLUSION: Efforts to increase vaccination coverage should take reasons for non-vaccination into account.
format Text
id pubmed-1464125
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-14641252006-05-23 Vaccination coverage and reasons for non-vaccination in a district of Istanbul Torun, Sebahat D Bakırcı, Nadi BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: In order to control and eliminate the vaccine preventable diseases it is important to know the vaccination coverage and reasons for non-vaccination. The primary objective of this study was to determine the complete vaccination rate; the reasons for non-vaccination and the predictors that influence vaccination of children. The other objective was to determine coverage of measles vaccination of the Measles Immunization Days (MID) 2005 for children aged 9 month to 6 years in a region of Umraniye, Istanbul, Turkey. METHODS: A '30 × 7' cluster sampling design was used as the sampling method. Thirty streets were selected at random from study area. Survey data were collected by a questionnaire which was applied face to face to parents of 221 children. A Chi-square test and logistic regression was used for the statistical analyses. Content analysis method was used to evaluate the open-ended questions. RESULTS: The complete vaccination rate for study population was 84.5% and 3.2% of all children were totally non-vaccinated. The siblings of non-vaccinated children were also non-vaccinated. Reasons for non-vaccination were as follows: being in the village and couldn't reach to health care services; having no knowledge about vaccination; the father of child didn't allow vaccination; intercurrent illness of child during vaccination time; missed opportunities like not to shave off a vial for only one child. In logistic regression analysis, paternal and maternal levels of education and immigration time of both parents to Istanbul were found to influence whether children were completely vaccinated or non-vaccinated. Measles vaccination coverage during MID was 79.3%. CONCLUSION: Efforts to increase vaccination coverage should take reasons for non-vaccination into account. BioMed Central 2006-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC1464125/ /pubmed/16677375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-6-125 Text en Copyright © 2006 Torun and Bakırcı; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
spellingShingle Research Article
Torun, Sebahat D
Bakırcı, Nadi
Vaccination coverage and reasons for non-vaccination in a district of Istanbul
title Vaccination coverage and reasons for non-vaccination in a district of Istanbul
title_full Vaccination coverage and reasons for non-vaccination in a district of Istanbul
title_fullStr Vaccination coverage and reasons for non-vaccination in a district of Istanbul
title_full_unstemmed Vaccination coverage and reasons for non-vaccination in a district of Istanbul
title_short Vaccination coverage and reasons for non-vaccination in a district of Istanbul
title_sort vaccination coverage and reasons for non-vaccination in a district of istanbul
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1464125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16677375
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-6-125
work_keys_str_mv AT torunsebahatd vaccinationcoverageandreasonsfornonvaccinationinadistrictofistanbul
AT bakırcınadi vaccinationcoverageandreasonsfornonvaccinationinadistrictofistanbul