Cargando…

A comparison of alternative 60-mer probe designs in an in-situ synthesized oligonucleotide microarray

BACKGROUND: DNA microarrays have proven powerful for functional genomics studies. Several technologies exist for the generation of whole-genome arrays. It is well documented that 25mer probes directed against different regions of the same gene produce variable signal intensity values. However, the e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leiske, Danielle L, Karimpour-Fard, Anis, Hume, Patrick S, Fairbanks, Benjamin D, Gill, Ryan T
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1468409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16595014
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-7-72
_version_ 1782127557918851072
author Leiske, Danielle L
Karimpour-Fard, Anis
Hume, Patrick S
Fairbanks, Benjamin D
Gill, Ryan T
author_facet Leiske, Danielle L
Karimpour-Fard, Anis
Hume, Patrick S
Fairbanks, Benjamin D
Gill, Ryan T
author_sort Leiske, Danielle L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: DNA microarrays have proven powerful for functional genomics studies. Several technologies exist for the generation of whole-genome arrays. It is well documented that 25mer probes directed against different regions of the same gene produce variable signal intensity values. However, the extent to which this is true for probes of greater length (60mers) is not well characterized. Moreover, this information has not previously been reported for whole-genome arrays designed against bacteria, whose genomes may differ substantially in characteristics directly affecting microarray performance. RESULTS: We report here an analysis of alternative 60mer probe designs for an in-situ synthesized oligonucleotide array for the GC rich, β-proteobacterium Burkholderia cenocepacia. Probes were designed using the ArrayOligoSel3.5 software package and whole-genome microarrays synthesized by Agilent, Inc. using their in-situ, ink-jet technology platform. We first validated the quality of the microarrays as demonstrated by an average signal to noise ratio of >1000. Next, we determined that the variance of replicate probes (1178 total probes examined) of identical sequence was 3.8% whereas the variance of alternative probes (558 total alternative probes examined) designs was 9.5%. We determined that depending upon the definition, about 2.4% of replicate and 7.8% of alternative probes produced outlier conclusions. Finally, we determined none of the probe design subscores (GC content, internal repeat, binding energy and self annealment) produced by ArrayOligoSel3.5 were predictive or probes that produced outlier signals. CONCLUSION: Our analysis demonstrated that the use of multiple probes per target sequence is not essential for in-situ synthesized 60mer oligonucleotide arrays designed against bacteria. Although probes producing outlier signals were identified, the use of ratios results in less than 10% of such outlier conclusions. We also determined that several different measures commonly utilized in probe design were not predictive of outlier probes.
format Text
id pubmed-1468409
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-14684092006-05-25 A comparison of alternative 60-mer probe designs in an in-situ synthesized oligonucleotide microarray Leiske, Danielle L Karimpour-Fard, Anis Hume, Patrick S Fairbanks, Benjamin D Gill, Ryan T BMC Genomics Methodology Article BACKGROUND: DNA microarrays have proven powerful for functional genomics studies. Several technologies exist for the generation of whole-genome arrays. It is well documented that 25mer probes directed against different regions of the same gene produce variable signal intensity values. However, the extent to which this is true for probes of greater length (60mers) is not well characterized. Moreover, this information has not previously been reported for whole-genome arrays designed against bacteria, whose genomes may differ substantially in characteristics directly affecting microarray performance. RESULTS: We report here an analysis of alternative 60mer probe designs for an in-situ synthesized oligonucleotide array for the GC rich, β-proteobacterium Burkholderia cenocepacia. Probes were designed using the ArrayOligoSel3.5 software package and whole-genome microarrays synthesized by Agilent, Inc. using their in-situ, ink-jet technology platform. We first validated the quality of the microarrays as demonstrated by an average signal to noise ratio of >1000. Next, we determined that the variance of replicate probes (1178 total probes examined) of identical sequence was 3.8% whereas the variance of alternative probes (558 total alternative probes examined) designs was 9.5%. We determined that depending upon the definition, about 2.4% of replicate and 7.8% of alternative probes produced outlier conclusions. Finally, we determined none of the probe design subscores (GC content, internal repeat, binding energy and self annealment) produced by ArrayOligoSel3.5 were predictive or probes that produced outlier signals. CONCLUSION: Our analysis demonstrated that the use of multiple probes per target sequence is not essential for in-situ synthesized 60mer oligonucleotide arrays designed against bacteria. Although probes producing outlier signals were identified, the use of ratios results in less than 10% of such outlier conclusions. We also determined that several different measures commonly utilized in probe design were not predictive of outlier probes. BioMed Central 2006-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC1468409/ /pubmed/16595014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-7-72 Text en Copyright © 2006 Danielle et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
spellingShingle Methodology Article
Leiske, Danielle L
Karimpour-Fard, Anis
Hume, Patrick S
Fairbanks, Benjamin D
Gill, Ryan T
A comparison of alternative 60-mer probe designs in an in-situ synthesized oligonucleotide microarray
title A comparison of alternative 60-mer probe designs in an in-situ synthesized oligonucleotide microarray
title_full A comparison of alternative 60-mer probe designs in an in-situ synthesized oligonucleotide microarray
title_fullStr A comparison of alternative 60-mer probe designs in an in-situ synthesized oligonucleotide microarray
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of alternative 60-mer probe designs in an in-situ synthesized oligonucleotide microarray
title_short A comparison of alternative 60-mer probe designs in an in-situ synthesized oligonucleotide microarray
title_sort comparison of alternative 60-mer probe designs in an in-situ synthesized oligonucleotide microarray
topic Methodology Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1468409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16595014
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-7-72
work_keys_str_mv AT leiskedaniellel acomparisonofalternative60merprobedesignsinaninsitusynthesizedoligonucleotidemicroarray
AT karimpourfardanis acomparisonofalternative60merprobedesignsinaninsitusynthesizedoligonucleotidemicroarray
AT humepatricks acomparisonofalternative60merprobedesignsinaninsitusynthesizedoligonucleotidemicroarray
AT fairbanksbenjamind acomparisonofalternative60merprobedesignsinaninsitusynthesizedoligonucleotidemicroarray
AT gillryant acomparisonofalternative60merprobedesignsinaninsitusynthesizedoligonucleotidemicroarray
AT leiskedaniellel comparisonofalternative60merprobedesignsinaninsitusynthesizedoligonucleotidemicroarray
AT karimpourfardanis comparisonofalternative60merprobedesignsinaninsitusynthesizedoligonucleotidemicroarray
AT humepatricks comparisonofalternative60merprobedesignsinaninsitusynthesizedoligonucleotidemicroarray
AT fairbanksbenjamind comparisonofalternative60merprobedesignsinaninsitusynthesizedoligonucleotidemicroarray
AT gillryant comparisonofalternative60merprobedesignsinaninsitusynthesizedoligonucleotidemicroarray