Cargando…

Efavirenz use during pregnancy and for women of child-bearing potential

BACKGROUND: Efavirenz is the preferred non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor for first-line antiretroviral treatment in many countries. For women of childbearing potential, advantages of efavirenz are balanced by concerns that it is teratogenic. This paper reviews evidence of efavirenz tera...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chersich, Matthew F, Urban, Michael F, Venter, Francois WD, Wessels, Tina, Krause, Amanda, Gray, Glenda E, Luchters, Stanley, Viljoen, Dennis L
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1468418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16603057
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-6405-3-11
_version_ 1782127560199503872
author Chersich, Matthew F
Urban, Michael F
Venter, Francois WD
Wessels, Tina
Krause, Amanda
Gray, Glenda E
Luchters, Stanley
Viljoen, Dennis L
author_facet Chersich, Matthew F
Urban, Michael F
Venter, Francois WD
Wessels, Tina
Krause, Amanda
Gray, Glenda E
Luchters, Stanley
Viljoen, Dennis L
author_sort Chersich, Matthew F
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Efavirenz is the preferred non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor for first-line antiretroviral treatment in many countries. For women of childbearing potential, advantages of efavirenz are balanced by concerns that it is teratogenic. This paper reviews evidence of efavirenz teratogenicity and considers implications in common clinical scenarios. FINDINGS: Concerns of efavirenz-induced fetal effects stem from animal studies, although the predictive value of animal data for humans is unknown. Four retrospective cases of central nervous system birth defects in infants with first trimester exposure to efavirenz have been interpreted as being consistent with animal data. In a prospective pregnancy registry, which is subject to fewer potential biases, no increase was detected in overall risk of birth defects following exposure to efavirenz in the first-trimester. DISCUSSION: For women planning a pregnancy or not using contraception, efavirenz should be avoided if alternatives are available. According to WHO guidelines for resource-constrained settings, benefits of efavirenz are likely to outweigh risks for women using contraception. Women who become pregnant while receiving efavirenz often consider drug substitution or temporarily suspending treatment. Both options have substantial risks for maternal and fetal health which, we argue, appear unjustified after the critical period of organogenesis (3–8 weeks post-conception). Efavirenz-based triple regimens, initiated after the first trimester of pregnancy and discontinued after childbirth, are potentially an important alternative for reducing mother-to-child transmission in pregnant women who do not yet require antiretroviral treatment. CONCLUSION: Current recommendations for care for women who become pregnant while receiving efavirenz may need to be re-considered, particularly in settings with limited alternative drugs and laboratory monitoring. With current data limitations, additional adequately powered prospective studies are needed.
format Text
id pubmed-1468418
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-14684182006-05-25 Efavirenz use during pregnancy and for women of child-bearing potential Chersich, Matthew F Urban, Michael F Venter, Francois WD Wessels, Tina Krause, Amanda Gray, Glenda E Luchters, Stanley Viljoen, Dennis L AIDS Res Ther Review BACKGROUND: Efavirenz is the preferred non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor for first-line antiretroviral treatment in many countries. For women of childbearing potential, advantages of efavirenz are balanced by concerns that it is teratogenic. This paper reviews evidence of efavirenz teratogenicity and considers implications in common clinical scenarios. FINDINGS: Concerns of efavirenz-induced fetal effects stem from animal studies, although the predictive value of animal data for humans is unknown. Four retrospective cases of central nervous system birth defects in infants with first trimester exposure to efavirenz have been interpreted as being consistent with animal data. In a prospective pregnancy registry, which is subject to fewer potential biases, no increase was detected in overall risk of birth defects following exposure to efavirenz in the first-trimester. DISCUSSION: For women planning a pregnancy or not using contraception, efavirenz should be avoided if alternatives are available. According to WHO guidelines for resource-constrained settings, benefits of efavirenz are likely to outweigh risks for women using contraception. Women who become pregnant while receiving efavirenz often consider drug substitution or temporarily suspending treatment. Both options have substantial risks for maternal and fetal health which, we argue, appear unjustified after the critical period of organogenesis (3–8 weeks post-conception). Efavirenz-based triple regimens, initiated after the first trimester of pregnancy and discontinued after childbirth, are potentially an important alternative for reducing mother-to-child transmission in pregnant women who do not yet require antiretroviral treatment. CONCLUSION: Current recommendations for care for women who become pregnant while receiving efavirenz may need to be re-considered, particularly in settings with limited alternative drugs and laboratory monitoring. With current data limitations, additional adequately powered prospective studies are needed. BioMed Central 2006-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC1468418/ /pubmed/16603057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-6405-3-11 Text en Copyright © 2006 Chersich et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Chersich, Matthew F
Urban, Michael F
Venter, Francois WD
Wessels, Tina
Krause, Amanda
Gray, Glenda E
Luchters, Stanley
Viljoen, Dennis L
Efavirenz use during pregnancy and for women of child-bearing potential
title Efavirenz use during pregnancy and for women of child-bearing potential
title_full Efavirenz use during pregnancy and for women of child-bearing potential
title_fullStr Efavirenz use during pregnancy and for women of child-bearing potential
title_full_unstemmed Efavirenz use during pregnancy and for women of child-bearing potential
title_short Efavirenz use during pregnancy and for women of child-bearing potential
title_sort efavirenz use during pregnancy and for women of child-bearing potential
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1468418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16603057
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-6405-3-11
work_keys_str_mv AT chersichmatthewf efavirenzuseduringpregnancyandforwomenofchildbearingpotential
AT urbanmichaelf efavirenzuseduringpregnancyandforwomenofchildbearingpotential
AT venterfrancoiswd efavirenzuseduringpregnancyandforwomenofchildbearingpotential
AT wesselstina efavirenzuseduringpregnancyandforwomenofchildbearingpotential
AT krauseamanda efavirenzuseduringpregnancyandforwomenofchildbearingpotential
AT grayglendae efavirenzuseduringpregnancyandforwomenofchildbearingpotential
AT luchtersstanley efavirenzuseduringpregnancyandforwomenofchildbearingpotential
AT viljoendennisl efavirenzuseduringpregnancyandforwomenofchildbearingpotential