Cargando…

Reliability, validity and responsiveness of a Norwegian version of the Chronic Sinusitis Survey

BACKGROUND: The Chronic Sinusitis Survey (CSS) is a valid, disease-specific questionnaire for assessing health status and treatment effectiveness in chronic rhinosinusitis. In the present study, we developed a Norwegian version of the CSS and assessed its psychometric properties. METHODS: In the poo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stavem, Knut, Røssberg, Edna, Larsson, Pål G
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1468424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16677392
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6815-6-9
_version_ 1782127561665413120
author Stavem, Knut
Røssberg, Edna
Larsson, Pål G
author_facet Stavem, Knut
Røssberg, Edna
Larsson, Pål G
author_sort Stavem, Knut
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Chronic Sinusitis Survey (CSS) is a valid, disease-specific questionnaire for assessing health status and treatment effectiveness in chronic rhinosinusitis. In the present study, we developed a Norwegian version of the CSS and assessed its psychometric properties. METHODS: In the pooled data set of 65 patients from a trial of treatment for chronic sinusitis with long-standing symptoms and signs of sinusitis on computed tomography (CT), we assessed the reliability, validity and responsiveness of the CSS. RESULTS: Test-retest reliability of the two CSS scales and the total scale ranged 0.87–0.92, while internal consistency reliability ranged 0.31–0.55. CSS subscale scores were associated with other items on sinusitis symptoms, and with the Mental health and Bodily pain scale of the SF-36. There was little association of the CSS scale scores with sinus CT findings. The patients with chronic sinusitis had worse scores on all three CSS scales than a healthy reference population (n = 42) (p < 0.001). The CSS sinus symptoms subscale and the total scale were sensitive to improvement in global symptoms during 12 weeks. CONCLUSION: The Norwegian version of the CSS had acceptable test-retest reliability, but lower internal consistency reliability than the accepted standard criteria. The results support the construct validity of the measure and the sinusitis symptoms subscale and the total scales were responsive to change. This supports the use of the questionnaire in interventions for chronic sinusitis, but points at problems with the internal consistency reliability.
format Text
id pubmed-1468424
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-14684242006-05-25 Reliability, validity and responsiveness of a Norwegian version of the Chronic Sinusitis Survey Stavem, Knut Røssberg, Edna Larsson, Pål G BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: The Chronic Sinusitis Survey (CSS) is a valid, disease-specific questionnaire for assessing health status and treatment effectiveness in chronic rhinosinusitis. In the present study, we developed a Norwegian version of the CSS and assessed its psychometric properties. METHODS: In the pooled data set of 65 patients from a trial of treatment for chronic sinusitis with long-standing symptoms and signs of sinusitis on computed tomography (CT), we assessed the reliability, validity and responsiveness of the CSS. RESULTS: Test-retest reliability of the two CSS scales and the total scale ranged 0.87–0.92, while internal consistency reliability ranged 0.31–0.55. CSS subscale scores were associated with other items on sinusitis symptoms, and with the Mental health and Bodily pain scale of the SF-36. There was little association of the CSS scale scores with sinus CT findings. The patients with chronic sinusitis had worse scores on all three CSS scales than a healthy reference population (n = 42) (p < 0.001). The CSS sinus symptoms subscale and the total scale were sensitive to improvement in global symptoms during 12 weeks. CONCLUSION: The Norwegian version of the CSS had acceptable test-retest reliability, but lower internal consistency reliability than the accepted standard criteria. The results support the construct validity of the measure and the sinusitis symptoms subscale and the total scales were responsive to change. This supports the use of the questionnaire in interventions for chronic sinusitis, but points at problems with the internal consistency reliability. BioMed Central 2006-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC1468424/ /pubmed/16677392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6815-6-9 Text en Copyright © 2006 Stavem et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Stavem, Knut
Røssberg, Edna
Larsson, Pål G
Reliability, validity and responsiveness of a Norwegian version of the Chronic Sinusitis Survey
title Reliability, validity and responsiveness of a Norwegian version of the Chronic Sinusitis Survey
title_full Reliability, validity and responsiveness of a Norwegian version of the Chronic Sinusitis Survey
title_fullStr Reliability, validity and responsiveness of a Norwegian version of the Chronic Sinusitis Survey
title_full_unstemmed Reliability, validity and responsiveness of a Norwegian version of the Chronic Sinusitis Survey
title_short Reliability, validity and responsiveness of a Norwegian version of the Chronic Sinusitis Survey
title_sort reliability, validity and responsiveness of a norwegian version of the chronic sinusitis survey
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1468424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16677392
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6815-6-9
work_keys_str_mv AT stavemknut reliabilityvalidityandresponsivenessofanorwegianversionofthechronicsinusitissurvey
AT røssbergedna reliabilityvalidityandresponsivenessofanorwegianversionofthechronicsinusitissurvey
AT larssonpalg reliabilityvalidityandresponsivenessofanorwegianversionofthechronicsinusitissurvey