Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of acupuncture for the treatment of non-specific acute low back pain: a randomised controlled multicentre trial protocol [ISRCTN65814467]

BACKGROUND: Low back pain and its associated incapacitating effects constitute an important healthcare and socioeconomic problem, as well as being one of the main causes of disability among adults of working age. The prevalence of non-specific low back pain is very high among the general population,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vas, Jorge, Perea-Milla, Emilio, Mendez, Camila, Silva, Luis Carlos, Herrera Galante, Antonia, Aranda Regules, Jose Manuel, Martinez Barquin, Dulce M, Aguilar, Inmaculada, Faus, Vicente
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1468427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16630342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-6-14
_version_ 1782127562410950656
author Vas, Jorge
Perea-Milla, Emilio
Mendez, Camila
Silva, Luis Carlos
Herrera Galante, Antonia
Aranda Regules, Jose Manuel
Martinez Barquin, Dulce M
Aguilar, Inmaculada
Faus, Vicente
author_facet Vas, Jorge
Perea-Milla, Emilio
Mendez, Camila
Silva, Luis Carlos
Herrera Galante, Antonia
Aranda Regules, Jose Manuel
Martinez Barquin, Dulce M
Aguilar, Inmaculada
Faus, Vicente
author_sort Vas, Jorge
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Low back pain and its associated incapacitating effects constitute an important healthcare and socioeconomic problem, as well as being one of the main causes of disability among adults of working age. The prevalence of non-specific low back pain is very high among the general population, and 60–70% of adults are believed to have suffered this problem at some time. Nevertheless, few randomised clinical trials have been made of the efficacy and efficiency of acupuncture with respect to acute low back pain. The present study is intended to assess the efficacy of acupuncture for acute low back pain in terms of the improvement reported on the Roland Morris Questionnaire (RMQ) on low back pain incapacity, to estimate the specific and non-specific effects produced by the technique, and to carry out a cost-effectiveness analysis. METHODS/DESIGN: Randomised four-branch controlled multicentre prospective study made to compare semi-standardised real acupuncture, sham acupuncture (acupuncture at non-specific points), placebo acupuncture and conventional treatment. The patients are blinded to the real, sham and placebo acupuncture treatments. Patients in the sample present symptoms of non specific acute low back pain, with a case history of 2 weeks or less, and will be selected from working-age patients, whether in paid employment or not, referred by General Practitioners from Primary Healthcare Clinics to the four clinics participating in this study. In order to assess the primary and secondary result measures, the patients will be requested to fill in a questionnaire before the randomisation and again at 3, 12 and 48 weeks after starting the treatment. The primary result measure will be the clinical relevant improvement (CRI) at 3 weeks after randomisation. We define CRI as a reduction of 35% or more in the RMQ results. DISCUSSION: This study is intended to obtain further evidence on the effectiveness of acupuncture on acute low back pain and to isolate the specific and non-specific effects of the treatment.
format Text
id pubmed-1468427
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-14684272006-05-25 Efficacy and safety of acupuncture for the treatment of non-specific acute low back pain: a randomised controlled multicentre trial protocol [ISRCTN65814467] Vas, Jorge Perea-Milla, Emilio Mendez, Camila Silva, Luis Carlos Herrera Galante, Antonia Aranda Regules, Jose Manuel Martinez Barquin, Dulce M Aguilar, Inmaculada Faus, Vicente BMC Complement Altern Med Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Low back pain and its associated incapacitating effects constitute an important healthcare and socioeconomic problem, as well as being one of the main causes of disability among adults of working age. The prevalence of non-specific low back pain is very high among the general population, and 60–70% of adults are believed to have suffered this problem at some time. Nevertheless, few randomised clinical trials have been made of the efficacy and efficiency of acupuncture with respect to acute low back pain. The present study is intended to assess the efficacy of acupuncture for acute low back pain in terms of the improvement reported on the Roland Morris Questionnaire (RMQ) on low back pain incapacity, to estimate the specific and non-specific effects produced by the technique, and to carry out a cost-effectiveness analysis. METHODS/DESIGN: Randomised four-branch controlled multicentre prospective study made to compare semi-standardised real acupuncture, sham acupuncture (acupuncture at non-specific points), placebo acupuncture and conventional treatment. The patients are blinded to the real, sham and placebo acupuncture treatments. Patients in the sample present symptoms of non specific acute low back pain, with a case history of 2 weeks or less, and will be selected from working-age patients, whether in paid employment or not, referred by General Practitioners from Primary Healthcare Clinics to the four clinics participating in this study. In order to assess the primary and secondary result measures, the patients will be requested to fill in a questionnaire before the randomisation and again at 3, 12 and 48 weeks after starting the treatment. The primary result measure will be the clinical relevant improvement (CRI) at 3 weeks after randomisation. We define CRI as a reduction of 35% or more in the RMQ results. DISCUSSION: This study is intended to obtain further evidence on the effectiveness of acupuncture on acute low back pain and to isolate the specific and non-specific effects of the treatment. BioMed Central 2006-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC1468427/ /pubmed/16630342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-6-14 Text en Copyright © 2006 Vas et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Vas, Jorge
Perea-Milla, Emilio
Mendez, Camila
Silva, Luis Carlos
Herrera Galante, Antonia
Aranda Regules, Jose Manuel
Martinez Barquin, Dulce M
Aguilar, Inmaculada
Faus, Vicente
Efficacy and safety of acupuncture for the treatment of non-specific acute low back pain: a randomised controlled multicentre trial protocol [ISRCTN65814467]
title Efficacy and safety of acupuncture for the treatment of non-specific acute low back pain: a randomised controlled multicentre trial protocol [ISRCTN65814467]
title_full Efficacy and safety of acupuncture for the treatment of non-specific acute low back pain: a randomised controlled multicentre trial protocol [ISRCTN65814467]
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of acupuncture for the treatment of non-specific acute low back pain: a randomised controlled multicentre trial protocol [ISRCTN65814467]
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of acupuncture for the treatment of non-specific acute low back pain: a randomised controlled multicentre trial protocol [ISRCTN65814467]
title_short Efficacy and safety of acupuncture for the treatment of non-specific acute low back pain: a randomised controlled multicentre trial protocol [ISRCTN65814467]
title_sort efficacy and safety of acupuncture for the treatment of non-specific acute low back pain: a randomised controlled multicentre trial protocol [isrctn65814467]
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1468427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16630342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-6-14
work_keys_str_mv AT vasjorge efficacyandsafetyofacupunctureforthetreatmentofnonspecificacutelowbackpainarandomisedcontrolledmulticentretrialprotocolisrctn65814467
AT pereamillaemilio efficacyandsafetyofacupunctureforthetreatmentofnonspecificacutelowbackpainarandomisedcontrolledmulticentretrialprotocolisrctn65814467
AT mendezcamila efficacyandsafetyofacupunctureforthetreatmentofnonspecificacutelowbackpainarandomisedcontrolledmulticentretrialprotocolisrctn65814467
AT silvaluiscarlos efficacyandsafetyofacupunctureforthetreatmentofnonspecificacutelowbackpainarandomisedcontrolledmulticentretrialprotocolisrctn65814467
AT herreragalanteantonia efficacyandsafetyofacupunctureforthetreatmentofnonspecificacutelowbackpainarandomisedcontrolledmulticentretrialprotocolisrctn65814467
AT arandaregulesjosemanuel efficacyandsafetyofacupunctureforthetreatmentofnonspecificacutelowbackpainarandomisedcontrolledmulticentretrialprotocolisrctn65814467
AT martinezbarquindulcem efficacyandsafetyofacupunctureforthetreatmentofnonspecificacutelowbackpainarandomisedcontrolledmulticentretrialprotocolisrctn65814467
AT aguilarinmaculada efficacyandsafetyofacupunctureforthetreatmentofnonspecificacutelowbackpainarandomisedcontrolledmulticentretrialprotocolisrctn65814467
AT fausvicente efficacyandsafetyofacupunctureforthetreatmentofnonspecificacutelowbackpainarandomisedcontrolledmulticentretrialprotocolisrctn65814467