Cargando…

Have sperm densities declined? A reanalysis of global trend data.

In 1992 a worldwide decline in sperm density was reported; this was quickly followed by numerous critiques and editorials. Because of the public health importance of this finding, a detailed reanalysis of data from 61 studies was warranted to resolve these issues. Multiple linear regression models (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Swan, S H, Elkin, E P, Fenster, L
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 1997
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1470335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9370524
_version_ 1782127808012615680
author Swan, S H
Elkin, E P
Fenster, L
author_facet Swan, S H
Elkin, E P
Fenster, L
author_sort Swan, S H
collection PubMed
description In 1992 a worldwide decline in sperm density was reported; this was quickly followed by numerous critiques and editorials. Because of the public health importance of this finding, a detailed reanalysis of data from 61 studies was warranted to resolve these issues. Multiple linear regression models (controlling for abstinence time, age, percent proven fertility, specimen collection method, study goal and location) were used to examine regional differences and the interaction between region (United States, Europe, and non-Western countries) and year. Nonlinear models and residual confounding were also examined in these data. Using a linear model (adjusted R2 = 0. 80), means and slopes differed significantly across regions (p = 0. 02). Mean sperm densities were highest in Europe and lowest in non-Western countries. A decline in sperm density was seen in the United States (studies from 1938-1988; slope = -1.50; 95% confidence interval (CI), -1.90--1.10) and Europe (1971-1990; slope = -3.13; CI, -4.96- -1.30), but not in non-Western countries (1978-1989; slope = 1.56; CI, -1.00-4.12). Results from nonlinear models (quadratic and spline) were similar. Thus, further analysis of these studies supports a significant decline in sperm density in the United States and Europe. Confounding and selection bias are unlikely to account for these results. However, some intraregional differences were as large as mean decline in sperm density between 1938 and 1990, and recent reports from Europe and the United States further support large interarea differences in sperm density. Identifying the cause(s) of these regional and temporal differences, whether environmental or other, is clearly warranted.
format Text
id pubmed-1470335
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1997
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-14703352006-06-01 Have sperm densities declined? A reanalysis of global trend data. Swan, S H Elkin, E P Fenster, L Environ Health Perspect Research Article In 1992 a worldwide decline in sperm density was reported; this was quickly followed by numerous critiques and editorials. Because of the public health importance of this finding, a detailed reanalysis of data from 61 studies was warranted to resolve these issues. Multiple linear regression models (controlling for abstinence time, age, percent proven fertility, specimen collection method, study goal and location) were used to examine regional differences and the interaction between region (United States, Europe, and non-Western countries) and year. Nonlinear models and residual confounding were also examined in these data. Using a linear model (adjusted R2 = 0. 80), means and slopes differed significantly across regions (p = 0. 02). Mean sperm densities were highest in Europe and lowest in non-Western countries. A decline in sperm density was seen in the United States (studies from 1938-1988; slope = -1.50; 95% confidence interval (CI), -1.90--1.10) and Europe (1971-1990; slope = -3.13; CI, -4.96- -1.30), but not in non-Western countries (1978-1989; slope = 1.56; CI, -1.00-4.12). Results from nonlinear models (quadratic and spline) were similar. Thus, further analysis of these studies supports a significant decline in sperm density in the United States and Europe. Confounding and selection bias are unlikely to account for these results. However, some intraregional differences were as large as mean decline in sperm density between 1938 and 1990, and recent reports from Europe and the United States further support large interarea differences in sperm density. Identifying the cause(s) of these regional and temporal differences, whether environmental or other, is clearly warranted. 1997-11 /pmc/articles/PMC1470335/ /pubmed/9370524 Text en
spellingShingle Research Article
Swan, S H
Elkin, E P
Fenster, L
Have sperm densities declined? A reanalysis of global trend data.
title Have sperm densities declined? A reanalysis of global trend data.
title_full Have sperm densities declined? A reanalysis of global trend data.
title_fullStr Have sperm densities declined? A reanalysis of global trend data.
title_full_unstemmed Have sperm densities declined? A reanalysis of global trend data.
title_short Have sperm densities declined? A reanalysis of global trend data.
title_sort have sperm densities declined? a reanalysis of global trend data.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1470335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9370524
work_keys_str_mv AT swansh havespermdensitiesdeclinedareanalysisofglobaltrenddata
AT elkinep havespermdensitiesdeclinedareanalysisofglobaltrenddata
AT fensterl havespermdensitiesdeclinedareanalysisofglobaltrenddata