Cargando…

Microscopical comparison of cotton, corn, and soybean dusts.

Specialized analytical methods are required for identification of components of agricultural dusts such as those generated in harvesting, transportation, storage, and processing of cotton, corn, and soybeans. The larger particles and trash components of the dusts can often be identified visually or...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goynes, W R, Ingber, B F, Palmgren, M S
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 1986
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1474369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3709475
_version_ 1782127895090561024
author Goynes, W R
Ingber, B F
Palmgren, M S
author_facet Goynes, W R
Ingber, B F
Palmgren, M S
author_sort Goynes, W R
collection PubMed
description Specialized analytical methods are required for identification of components of agricultural dusts such as those generated in harvesting, transportation, storage, and processing of cotton, corn, and soybeans. The larger particles and trash components of the dusts can often be identified visually or with the aid of an optical microscope (OM). The respirable portion of the dust, that which causes lung dysfunction, retains few structural features for identification. Electron microscopy and X-ray microanalysis, together with special optical microscopical techniques, can be used to characterize these microdusts. Combination studies with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis of cotton dusts have shown the presence of mineralogical particles probably of a soil origin and materials that can be associated with plant parts. Even in screened and filtered cotton dusts, fibrillar fragments are usually present due to their ability to penetrate openings the size of their diameters. The corn and soybean dusts studied were different from the cotton dust in that the large fibrillar component of the cotton dust was absent in the screened grain dusts. However, these dusts consisted of structurally unrecognizable particles that appeared similar to those found in cotton dust. In addition they contained many spheroid particles identified as starch. Dusts from all three sources were found to agglomerate into larger particles, some of which were still less than 10 micron. This agglomeration could confuse the instrumental measurement of dust particle size.
format Text
id pubmed-1474369
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1986
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-14743692006-06-09 Microscopical comparison of cotton, corn, and soybean dusts. Goynes, W R Ingber, B F Palmgren, M S Environ Health Perspect Research Article Specialized analytical methods are required for identification of components of agricultural dusts such as those generated in harvesting, transportation, storage, and processing of cotton, corn, and soybeans. The larger particles and trash components of the dusts can often be identified visually or with the aid of an optical microscope (OM). The respirable portion of the dust, that which causes lung dysfunction, retains few structural features for identification. Electron microscopy and X-ray microanalysis, together with special optical microscopical techniques, can be used to characterize these microdusts. Combination studies with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis of cotton dusts have shown the presence of mineralogical particles probably of a soil origin and materials that can be associated with plant parts. Even in screened and filtered cotton dusts, fibrillar fragments are usually present due to their ability to penetrate openings the size of their diameters. The corn and soybean dusts studied were different from the cotton dust in that the large fibrillar component of the cotton dust was absent in the screened grain dusts. However, these dusts consisted of structurally unrecognizable particles that appeared similar to those found in cotton dust. In addition they contained many spheroid particles identified as starch. Dusts from all three sources were found to agglomerate into larger particles, some of which were still less than 10 micron. This agglomeration could confuse the instrumental measurement of dust particle size. 1986-04 /pmc/articles/PMC1474369/ /pubmed/3709475 Text en
spellingShingle Research Article
Goynes, W R
Ingber, B F
Palmgren, M S
Microscopical comparison of cotton, corn, and soybean dusts.
title Microscopical comparison of cotton, corn, and soybean dusts.
title_full Microscopical comparison of cotton, corn, and soybean dusts.
title_fullStr Microscopical comparison of cotton, corn, and soybean dusts.
title_full_unstemmed Microscopical comparison of cotton, corn, and soybean dusts.
title_short Microscopical comparison of cotton, corn, and soybean dusts.
title_sort microscopical comparison of cotton, corn, and soybean dusts.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1474369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3709475
work_keys_str_mv AT goyneswr microscopicalcomparisonofcottoncornandsoybeandusts
AT ingberbf microscopicalcomparisonofcottoncornandsoybeandusts
AT palmgrenms microscopicalcomparisonofcottoncornandsoybeandusts