Cargando…

Model ecosystem evaluation of the environmental impacts of the veterinary drugs phenothiazine, sulfamethazine, clopidol, and diethylstilbestrol.

Four veterinary drugs of dissimilar chemical structures were evaluated for environmental stability and penchant for bioaccumulation. The techniques used were (1) a model aquatic ecosystem (3 days) and (2) a model feedlot ecosystem (33 days) in which the drugs were introduced via the excreta of chick...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coats, J R, Metcalf, R L, Lu, P Y, Brown, D D, Williams, J F, Hansen, L G
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 1976
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1475296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1037611
_version_ 1782128072115355648
author Coats, J R
Metcalf, R L
Lu, P Y
Brown, D D
Williams, J F
Hansen, L G
author_facet Coats, J R
Metcalf, R L
Lu, P Y
Brown, D D
Williams, J F
Hansen, L G
author_sort Coats, J R
collection PubMed
description Four veterinary drugs of dissimilar chemical structures were evaluated for environmental stability and penchant for bioaccumulation. The techniques used were (1) a model aquatic ecosystem (3 days) and (2) a model feedlot ecosystem (33 days) in which the drugs were introduced via the excreta of chicks or mice. The model feedlot ecosystem was supported by metabolism cage studies to determine the amount and the form of the drug excreted by the chicks or mice. Considerable quantities of all the drugs were excreted intact or as environmentally short-lived conjugates. Diethylstilbestrol (DES) and Clopidol were the most persistent molecules, but only DES bioaccumulated to any appreciable degree. Phenothiazine was very biodegradable; sulfamethazine was relatively biodegradable and only accumulated in the organisms to very low levels. Data from the aquatic model ecosystem demonstrated a good correlation between the partition coefficients of the drugs and their accumulation in the fish.
format Text
id pubmed-1475296
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1976
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-14752962006-06-09 Model ecosystem evaluation of the environmental impacts of the veterinary drugs phenothiazine, sulfamethazine, clopidol, and diethylstilbestrol. Coats, J R Metcalf, R L Lu, P Y Brown, D D Williams, J F Hansen, L G Environ Health Perspect Research Article Four veterinary drugs of dissimilar chemical structures were evaluated for environmental stability and penchant for bioaccumulation. The techniques used were (1) a model aquatic ecosystem (3 days) and (2) a model feedlot ecosystem (33 days) in which the drugs were introduced via the excreta of chicks or mice. The model feedlot ecosystem was supported by metabolism cage studies to determine the amount and the form of the drug excreted by the chicks or mice. Considerable quantities of all the drugs were excreted intact or as environmentally short-lived conjugates. Diethylstilbestrol (DES) and Clopidol were the most persistent molecules, but only DES bioaccumulated to any appreciable degree. Phenothiazine was very biodegradable; sulfamethazine was relatively biodegradable and only accumulated in the organisms to very low levels. Data from the aquatic model ecosystem demonstrated a good correlation between the partition coefficients of the drugs and their accumulation in the fish. 1976-12 /pmc/articles/PMC1475296/ /pubmed/1037611 Text en
spellingShingle Research Article
Coats, J R
Metcalf, R L
Lu, P Y
Brown, D D
Williams, J F
Hansen, L G
Model ecosystem evaluation of the environmental impacts of the veterinary drugs phenothiazine, sulfamethazine, clopidol, and diethylstilbestrol.
title Model ecosystem evaluation of the environmental impacts of the veterinary drugs phenothiazine, sulfamethazine, clopidol, and diethylstilbestrol.
title_full Model ecosystem evaluation of the environmental impacts of the veterinary drugs phenothiazine, sulfamethazine, clopidol, and diethylstilbestrol.
title_fullStr Model ecosystem evaluation of the environmental impacts of the veterinary drugs phenothiazine, sulfamethazine, clopidol, and diethylstilbestrol.
title_full_unstemmed Model ecosystem evaluation of the environmental impacts of the veterinary drugs phenothiazine, sulfamethazine, clopidol, and diethylstilbestrol.
title_short Model ecosystem evaluation of the environmental impacts of the veterinary drugs phenothiazine, sulfamethazine, clopidol, and diethylstilbestrol.
title_sort model ecosystem evaluation of the environmental impacts of the veterinary drugs phenothiazine, sulfamethazine, clopidol, and diethylstilbestrol.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1475296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1037611
work_keys_str_mv AT coatsjr modelecosystemevaluationoftheenvironmentalimpactsoftheveterinarydrugsphenothiazinesulfamethazineclopidolanddiethylstilbestrol
AT metcalfrl modelecosystemevaluationoftheenvironmentalimpactsoftheveterinarydrugsphenothiazinesulfamethazineclopidolanddiethylstilbestrol
AT lupy modelecosystemevaluationoftheenvironmentalimpactsoftheveterinarydrugsphenothiazinesulfamethazineclopidolanddiethylstilbestrol
AT browndd modelecosystemevaluationoftheenvironmentalimpactsoftheveterinarydrugsphenothiazinesulfamethazineclopidolanddiethylstilbestrol
AT williamsjf modelecosystemevaluationoftheenvironmentalimpactsoftheveterinarydrugsphenothiazinesulfamethazineclopidolanddiethylstilbestrol
AT hansenlg modelecosystemevaluationoftheenvironmentalimpactsoftheveterinarydrugsphenothiazinesulfamethazineclopidolanddiethylstilbestrol