Cargando…

A prospective multi-center cohort study of acute non-displaced fractures of the scaphoid: operative versus non-operative treatment [NCT00205985]

BACKGROUND: Acute scaphoid fractures are common in active adults and do lead to reasonable time lost to work. One important goal of treatment is early return to work or sport. On this background, the adequate treatment of non-displaced acute scaphoid fractures is still under discussion. The aim of t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pfeiffer, Boris M, Nübling, Matthias, Siebert, Hartmut R, Schädel-Höpfner, Michael
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1475583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16689987
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-7-41
_version_ 1782128118825222144
author Pfeiffer, Boris M
Nübling, Matthias
Siebert, Hartmut R
Schädel-Höpfner, Michael
author_facet Pfeiffer, Boris M
Nübling, Matthias
Siebert, Hartmut R
Schädel-Höpfner, Michael
author_sort Pfeiffer, Boris M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Acute scaphoid fractures are common in active adults and do lead to reasonable time lost to work. One important goal of treatment is early return to work or sport. On this background, the adequate treatment of non-displaced acute scaphoid fractures is still under discussion. The aim of this study is to compare time to return to previous activity level comparing surgical versus non-surgical treatment of non-displaced acute scaphoid fractures. METHODS/DESIGN: The study is designed as a non-randomized multiple center cohort study including 12 sites in Germany and Austria. The inclusion period is planned to be 12 months with a follow up of 6 months. Allocation to operative or non-operative treatment is choosen by the patient together with his treating surgeon. The primary outcome is time to return to previous activity level adapted for loading of the wrist in daily life as measured by a newly developed questionnaire (PLDL-wrist). Factors identified a priori to be associated with the outcome, e.g., poverty status, age, education, smoking status, gender, and occupation, are measured to ensure adequate control for their potential confounding effects. DISCUSSION: The rationale and the design of a multiple center cohort study are presented. As it is not considered feasible to randomize patients in this study, potential confounding effects need to be controlled adequately.
format Text
id pubmed-1475583
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-14755832006-06-08 A prospective multi-center cohort study of acute non-displaced fractures of the scaphoid: operative versus non-operative treatment [NCT00205985] Pfeiffer, Boris M Nübling, Matthias Siebert, Hartmut R Schädel-Höpfner, Michael BMC Musculoskelet Disord Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Acute scaphoid fractures are common in active adults and do lead to reasonable time lost to work. One important goal of treatment is early return to work or sport. On this background, the adequate treatment of non-displaced acute scaphoid fractures is still under discussion. The aim of this study is to compare time to return to previous activity level comparing surgical versus non-surgical treatment of non-displaced acute scaphoid fractures. METHODS/DESIGN: The study is designed as a non-randomized multiple center cohort study including 12 sites in Germany and Austria. The inclusion period is planned to be 12 months with a follow up of 6 months. Allocation to operative or non-operative treatment is choosen by the patient together with his treating surgeon. The primary outcome is time to return to previous activity level adapted for loading of the wrist in daily life as measured by a newly developed questionnaire (PLDL-wrist). Factors identified a priori to be associated with the outcome, e.g., poverty status, age, education, smoking status, gender, and occupation, are measured to ensure adequate control for their potential confounding effects. DISCUSSION: The rationale and the design of a multiple center cohort study are presented. As it is not considered feasible to randomize patients in this study, potential confounding effects need to be controlled adequately. BioMed Central 2006-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC1475583/ /pubmed/16689987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-7-41 Text en Copyright © 2006 Pfeiffer et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Pfeiffer, Boris M
Nübling, Matthias
Siebert, Hartmut R
Schädel-Höpfner, Michael
A prospective multi-center cohort study of acute non-displaced fractures of the scaphoid: operative versus non-operative treatment [NCT00205985]
title A prospective multi-center cohort study of acute non-displaced fractures of the scaphoid: operative versus non-operative treatment [NCT00205985]
title_full A prospective multi-center cohort study of acute non-displaced fractures of the scaphoid: operative versus non-operative treatment [NCT00205985]
title_fullStr A prospective multi-center cohort study of acute non-displaced fractures of the scaphoid: operative versus non-operative treatment [NCT00205985]
title_full_unstemmed A prospective multi-center cohort study of acute non-displaced fractures of the scaphoid: operative versus non-operative treatment [NCT00205985]
title_short A prospective multi-center cohort study of acute non-displaced fractures of the scaphoid: operative versus non-operative treatment [NCT00205985]
title_sort prospective multi-center cohort study of acute non-displaced fractures of the scaphoid: operative versus non-operative treatment [nct00205985]
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1475583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16689987
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-7-41
work_keys_str_mv AT pfeifferborism aprospectivemulticentercohortstudyofacutenondisplacedfracturesofthescaphoidoperativeversusnonoperativetreatmentnct00205985
AT nublingmatthias aprospectivemulticentercohortstudyofacutenondisplacedfracturesofthescaphoidoperativeversusnonoperativetreatmentnct00205985
AT sieberthartmutr aprospectivemulticentercohortstudyofacutenondisplacedfracturesofthescaphoidoperativeversusnonoperativetreatmentnct00205985
AT schadelhopfnermichael aprospectivemulticentercohortstudyofacutenondisplacedfracturesofthescaphoidoperativeversusnonoperativetreatmentnct00205985
AT pfeifferborism prospectivemulticentercohortstudyofacutenondisplacedfracturesofthescaphoidoperativeversusnonoperativetreatmentnct00205985
AT nublingmatthias prospectivemulticentercohortstudyofacutenondisplacedfracturesofthescaphoidoperativeversusnonoperativetreatmentnct00205985
AT sieberthartmutr prospectivemulticentercohortstudyofacutenondisplacedfracturesofthescaphoidoperativeversusnonoperativetreatmentnct00205985
AT schadelhopfnermichael prospectivemulticentercohortstudyofacutenondisplacedfracturesofthescaphoidoperativeversusnonoperativetreatmentnct00205985