Cargando…

Metal–organic complexation in the marine environment

We discuss the voltammetric methods that are used to assess metal–organic complexation in seawater. These consist of titration methods using anodic stripping voltammetry (ASV) and cathodic stripping voltammetry competitive ligand experiments (CSV-CLE). These approaches and a kinetic approach using C...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luther, George W, Rozan, Timothy F, Witter, Amy, Lewis, Brent
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2001
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1475598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16759421
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1467-4866-2-65
_version_ 1782128122537181184
author Luther, George W
Rozan, Timothy F
Witter, Amy
Lewis, Brent
author_facet Luther, George W
Rozan, Timothy F
Witter, Amy
Lewis, Brent
author_sort Luther, George W
collection PubMed
description We discuss the voltammetric methods that are used to assess metal–organic complexation in seawater. These consist of titration methods using anodic stripping voltammetry (ASV) and cathodic stripping voltammetry competitive ligand experiments (CSV-CLE). These approaches and a kinetic approach using CSV-CLE give similar information on the amount of excess ligand to metal in a sample and the conditional metal ligand stability constant for the excess ligand bound to the metal. CSV-CLE data using different ligands to measure Fe(III) organic complexes are similar. All these methods give conditional stability constants for which the side reaction coefficient for the metal can be corrected but not that for the ligand. Another approach, pseudovoltammetry, provides information on the actual metal–ligand complex(es) in a sample by doing ASV experiments where the deposition potential is varied more negatively in order to destroy the metal–ligand complex. This latter approach gives concentration information on each actual ligand bound to the metal as well as the thermodynamic stability constant of each complex in solution when compared to known metal–ligand complexes. In this case the side reaction coefficients for the metal and ligand are corrected. Thus, this method may not give identical information to the titration methods because the excess ligand in the sample may not be identical to some of the actual ligands binding the metal in the sample.
format Text
id pubmed-1475598
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2001
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-14755982006-06-08 Metal–organic complexation in the marine environment Luther, George W Rozan, Timothy F Witter, Amy Lewis, Brent Geochem Trans Article We discuss the voltammetric methods that are used to assess metal–organic complexation in seawater. These consist of titration methods using anodic stripping voltammetry (ASV) and cathodic stripping voltammetry competitive ligand experiments (CSV-CLE). These approaches and a kinetic approach using CSV-CLE give similar information on the amount of excess ligand to metal in a sample and the conditional metal ligand stability constant for the excess ligand bound to the metal. CSV-CLE data using different ligands to measure Fe(III) organic complexes are similar. All these methods give conditional stability constants for which the side reaction coefficient for the metal can be corrected but not that for the ligand. Another approach, pseudovoltammetry, provides information on the actual metal–ligand complex(es) in a sample by doing ASV experiments where the deposition potential is varied more negatively in order to destroy the metal–ligand complex. This latter approach gives concentration information on each actual ligand bound to the metal as well as the thermodynamic stability constant of each complex in solution when compared to known metal–ligand complexes. In this case the side reaction coefficients for the metal and ligand are corrected. Thus, this method may not give identical information to the titration methods because the excess ligand in the sample may not be identical to some of the actual ligands binding the metal in the sample. BioMed Central 2001-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC1475598/ /pubmed/16759421 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1467-4866-2-65 Text en Copyright © 2001 The Royal Society of Chemistry and the Division of Geochemistry of the American Chemical Society
spellingShingle Article
Luther, George W
Rozan, Timothy F
Witter, Amy
Lewis, Brent
Metal–organic complexation in the marine environment
title Metal–organic complexation in the marine environment
title_full Metal–organic complexation in the marine environment
title_fullStr Metal–organic complexation in the marine environment
title_full_unstemmed Metal–organic complexation in the marine environment
title_short Metal–organic complexation in the marine environment
title_sort metal–organic complexation in the marine environment
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1475598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16759421
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1467-4866-2-65
work_keys_str_mv AT luthergeorgew metalorganiccomplexationinthemarineenvironment
AT rozantimothyf metalorganiccomplexationinthemarineenvironment
AT witteramy metalorganiccomplexationinthemarineenvironment
AT lewisbrent metalorganiccomplexationinthemarineenvironment