Cargando…
Metal–organic complexation in the marine environment
We discuss the voltammetric methods that are used to assess metal–organic complexation in seawater. These consist of titration methods using anodic stripping voltammetry (ASV) and cathodic stripping voltammetry competitive ligand experiments (CSV-CLE). These approaches and a kinetic approach using C...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2001
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1475598/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16759421 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1467-4866-2-65 |
_version_ | 1782128122537181184 |
---|---|
author | Luther, George W Rozan, Timothy F Witter, Amy Lewis, Brent |
author_facet | Luther, George W Rozan, Timothy F Witter, Amy Lewis, Brent |
author_sort | Luther, George W |
collection | PubMed |
description | We discuss the voltammetric methods that are used to assess metal–organic complexation in seawater. These consist of titration methods using anodic stripping voltammetry (ASV) and cathodic stripping voltammetry competitive ligand experiments (CSV-CLE). These approaches and a kinetic approach using CSV-CLE give similar information on the amount of excess ligand to metal in a sample and the conditional metal ligand stability constant for the excess ligand bound to the metal. CSV-CLE data using different ligands to measure Fe(III) organic complexes are similar. All these methods give conditional stability constants for which the side reaction coefficient for the metal can be corrected but not that for the ligand. Another approach, pseudovoltammetry, provides information on the actual metal–ligand complex(es) in a sample by doing ASV experiments where the deposition potential is varied more negatively in order to destroy the metal–ligand complex. This latter approach gives concentration information on each actual ligand bound to the metal as well as the thermodynamic stability constant of each complex in solution when compared to known metal–ligand complexes. In this case the side reaction coefficients for the metal and ligand are corrected. Thus, this method may not give identical information to the titration methods because the excess ligand in the sample may not be identical to some of the actual ligands binding the metal in the sample. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1475598 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2001 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-14755982006-06-08 Metal–organic complexation in the marine environment Luther, George W Rozan, Timothy F Witter, Amy Lewis, Brent Geochem Trans Article We discuss the voltammetric methods that are used to assess metal–organic complexation in seawater. These consist of titration methods using anodic stripping voltammetry (ASV) and cathodic stripping voltammetry competitive ligand experiments (CSV-CLE). These approaches and a kinetic approach using CSV-CLE give similar information on the amount of excess ligand to metal in a sample and the conditional metal ligand stability constant for the excess ligand bound to the metal. CSV-CLE data using different ligands to measure Fe(III) organic complexes are similar. All these methods give conditional stability constants for which the side reaction coefficient for the metal can be corrected but not that for the ligand. Another approach, pseudovoltammetry, provides information on the actual metal–ligand complex(es) in a sample by doing ASV experiments where the deposition potential is varied more negatively in order to destroy the metal–ligand complex. This latter approach gives concentration information on each actual ligand bound to the metal as well as the thermodynamic stability constant of each complex in solution when compared to known metal–ligand complexes. In this case the side reaction coefficients for the metal and ligand are corrected. Thus, this method may not give identical information to the titration methods because the excess ligand in the sample may not be identical to some of the actual ligands binding the metal in the sample. BioMed Central 2001-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC1475598/ /pubmed/16759421 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1467-4866-2-65 Text en Copyright © 2001 The Royal Society of Chemistry and the Division of Geochemistry of the American Chemical Society |
spellingShingle | Article Luther, George W Rozan, Timothy F Witter, Amy Lewis, Brent Metal–organic complexation in the marine environment |
title | Metal–organic complexation in the marine environment |
title_full | Metal–organic complexation in the marine environment |
title_fullStr | Metal–organic complexation in the marine environment |
title_full_unstemmed | Metal–organic complexation in the marine environment |
title_short | Metal–organic complexation in the marine environment |
title_sort | metal–organic complexation in the marine environment |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1475598/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16759421 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1467-4866-2-65 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT luthergeorgew metalorganiccomplexationinthemarineenvironment AT rozantimothyf metalorganiccomplexationinthemarineenvironment AT witteramy metalorganiccomplexationinthemarineenvironment AT lewisbrent metalorganiccomplexationinthemarineenvironment |