Cargando…
What's the problem? A response to "secular humanism and scientific psychiatry"
Notwithstanding the interest and importance of Szasz's position, it neglects the phenomena, the real problems which take people to the clinic seeking treatment, and the conditionality of the notion of individual responsibility.
Autor principal: | Bolton, Derek |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1475610/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16759418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-5341-1-6 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Secular humanism and "scientific psychiatry"
por: Szasz, Thomas
Publicado: (2006) -
Sacred or secular? Exploring religious Coloradans’ questions about vaccines
por: Williams, Joshua T.B., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
What Ever Happened to the Scientific Conversation?
por: Goldenring, James R.
Publicado: (2016) -
Secular trends in new childhood epidemics: insights from evolutionary
medicine
por: Brüne, Martin, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Commentary on “Psychiatry and Cinema: What can We Learn from the Magical Screen?”
por: ANG, Qiuqing
Publicado: (2017)