Cargando…
A Community Resource Benchmarking Predictions of Peptide Binding to MHC-I Molecules
Recognition of peptides bound to major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules by T lymphocytes is an essential part of immune surveillance. Each MHC allele has a characteristic peptide binding preference, which can be captured in prediction algorithms, allowing for the rapid scan of enti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1475712/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16789818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020065 |
_version_ | 1782128140100829184 |
---|---|
author | Peters, Bjoern Bui, Huynh-Hoa Frankild, Sune Nielsen, Morten Lundegaard, Claus Kostem, Emrah Basch, Derek Lamberth, Kasper Harndahl, Mikkel Fleri, Ward Wilson, Stephen S Sidney, John Lund, Ole Buus, Soren Sette, Alessandro |
author_facet | Peters, Bjoern Bui, Huynh-Hoa Frankild, Sune Nielsen, Morten Lundegaard, Claus Kostem, Emrah Basch, Derek Lamberth, Kasper Harndahl, Mikkel Fleri, Ward Wilson, Stephen S Sidney, John Lund, Ole Buus, Soren Sette, Alessandro |
author_sort | Peters, Bjoern |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recognition of peptides bound to major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules by T lymphocytes is an essential part of immune surveillance. Each MHC allele has a characteristic peptide binding preference, which can be captured in prediction algorithms, allowing for the rapid scan of entire pathogen proteomes for peptide likely to bind MHC. Here we make public a large set of 48,828 quantitative peptide-binding affinity measurements relating to 48 different mouse, human, macaque, and chimpanzee MHC class I alleles. We use this data to establish a set of benchmark predictions with one neural network method and two matrix-based prediction methods extensively utilized in our groups. In general, the neural network outperforms the matrix-based predictions mainly due to its ability to generalize even on a small amount of data. We also retrieved predictions from tools publicly available on the internet. While differences in the data used to generate these predictions hamper direct comparisons, we do conclude that tools based on combinatorial peptide libraries perform remarkably well. The transparent prediction evaluation on this dataset provides tool developers with a benchmark for comparison of newly developed prediction methods. In addition, to generate and evaluate our own prediction methods, we have established an easily extensible web-based prediction framework that allows automated side-by-side comparisons of prediction methods implemented by experts. This is an advance over the current practice of tool developers having to generate reference predictions themselves, which can lead to underestimating the performance of prediction methods they are not as familiar with as their own. The overall goal of this effort is to provide a transparent prediction evaluation allowing bioinformaticians to identify promising features of prediction methods and providing guidance to immunologists regarding the reliability of prediction tools. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1475712 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-14757122006-06-09 A Community Resource Benchmarking Predictions of Peptide Binding to MHC-I Molecules Peters, Bjoern Bui, Huynh-Hoa Frankild, Sune Nielsen, Morten Lundegaard, Claus Kostem, Emrah Basch, Derek Lamberth, Kasper Harndahl, Mikkel Fleri, Ward Wilson, Stephen S Sidney, John Lund, Ole Buus, Soren Sette, Alessandro PLoS Comput Biol Research Article Recognition of peptides bound to major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules by T lymphocytes is an essential part of immune surveillance. Each MHC allele has a characteristic peptide binding preference, which can be captured in prediction algorithms, allowing for the rapid scan of entire pathogen proteomes for peptide likely to bind MHC. Here we make public a large set of 48,828 quantitative peptide-binding affinity measurements relating to 48 different mouse, human, macaque, and chimpanzee MHC class I alleles. We use this data to establish a set of benchmark predictions with one neural network method and two matrix-based prediction methods extensively utilized in our groups. In general, the neural network outperforms the matrix-based predictions mainly due to its ability to generalize even on a small amount of data. We also retrieved predictions from tools publicly available on the internet. While differences in the data used to generate these predictions hamper direct comparisons, we do conclude that tools based on combinatorial peptide libraries perform remarkably well. The transparent prediction evaluation on this dataset provides tool developers with a benchmark for comparison of newly developed prediction methods. In addition, to generate and evaluate our own prediction methods, we have established an easily extensible web-based prediction framework that allows automated side-by-side comparisons of prediction methods implemented by experts. This is an advance over the current practice of tool developers having to generate reference predictions themselves, which can lead to underestimating the performance of prediction methods they are not as familiar with as their own. The overall goal of this effort is to provide a transparent prediction evaluation allowing bioinformaticians to identify promising features of prediction methods and providing guidance to immunologists regarding the reliability of prediction tools. Public Library of Science 2006-06 2006-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC1475712/ /pubmed/16789818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020065 Text en © 2006 Peters et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Peters, Bjoern Bui, Huynh-Hoa Frankild, Sune Nielsen, Morten Lundegaard, Claus Kostem, Emrah Basch, Derek Lamberth, Kasper Harndahl, Mikkel Fleri, Ward Wilson, Stephen S Sidney, John Lund, Ole Buus, Soren Sette, Alessandro A Community Resource Benchmarking Predictions of Peptide Binding to MHC-I Molecules |
title | A Community Resource Benchmarking Predictions of Peptide Binding to MHC-I Molecules |
title_full | A Community Resource Benchmarking Predictions of Peptide Binding to MHC-I Molecules |
title_fullStr | A Community Resource Benchmarking Predictions of Peptide Binding to MHC-I Molecules |
title_full_unstemmed | A Community Resource Benchmarking Predictions of Peptide Binding to MHC-I Molecules |
title_short | A Community Resource Benchmarking Predictions of Peptide Binding to MHC-I Molecules |
title_sort | community resource benchmarking predictions of peptide binding to mhc-i molecules |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1475712/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16789818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020065 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT petersbjoern acommunityresourcebenchmarkingpredictionsofpeptidebindingtomhcimolecules AT buihuynhhoa acommunityresourcebenchmarkingpredictionsofpeptidebindingtomhcimolecules AT frankildsune acommunityresourcebenchmarkingpredictionsofpeptidebindingtomhcimolecules AT nielsenmorten acommunityresourcebenchmarkingpredictionsofpeptidebindingtomhcimolecules AT lundegaardclaus acommunityresourcebenchmarkingpredictionsofpeptidebindingtomhcimolecules AT kostememrah acommunityresourcebenchmarkingpredictionsofpeptidebindingtomhcimolecules AT baschderek acommunityresourcebenchmarkingpredictionsofpeptidebindingtomhcimolecules AT lamberthkasper acommunityresourcebenchmarkingpredictionsofpeptidebindingtomhcimolecules AT harndahlmikkel acommunityresourcebenchmarkingpredictionsofpeptidebindingtomhcimolecules AT fleriward acommunityresourcebenchmarkingpredictionsofpeptidebindingtomhcimolecules AT wilsonstephens acommunityresourcebenchmarkingpredictionsofpeptidebindingtomhcimolecules AT sidneyjohn acommunityresourcebenchmarkingpredictionsofpeptidebindingtomhcimolecules AT lundole acommunityresourcebenchmarkingpredictionsofpeptidebindingtomhcimolecules AT buussoren acommunityresourcebenchmarkingpredictionsofpeptidebindingtomhcimolecules AT settealessandro acommunityresourcebenchmarkingpredictionsofpeptidebindingtomhcimolecules AT petersbjoern communityresourcebenchmarkingpredictionsofpeptidebindingtomhcimolecules AT buihuynhhoa communityresourcebenchmarkingpredictionsofpeptidebindingtomhcimolecules AT frankildsune communityresourcebenchmarkingpredictionsofpeptidebindingtomhcimolecules AT nielsenmorten communityresourcebenchmarkingpredictionsofpeptidebindingtomhcimolecules AT lundegaardclaus communityresourcebenchmarkingpredictionsofpeptidebindingtomhcimolecules AT kostememrah communityresourcebenchmarkingpredictionsofpeptidebindingtomhcimolecules AT baschderek communityresourcebenchmarkingpredictionsofpeptidebindingtomhcimolecules AT lamberthkasper communityresourcebenchmarkingpredictionsofpeptidebindingtomhcimolecules AT harndahlmikkel communityresourcebenchmarkingpredictionsofpeptidebindingtomhcimolecules AT fleriward communityresourcebenchmarkingpredictionsofpeptidebindingtomhcimolecules AT wilsonstephens communityresourcebenchmarkingpredictionsofpeptidebindingtomhcimolecules AT sidneyjohn communityresourcebenchmarkingpredictionsofpeptidebindingtomhcimolecules AT lundole communityresourcebenchmarkingpredictionsofpeptidebindingtomhcimolecules AT buussoren communityresourcebenchmarkingpredictionsofpeptidebindingtomhcimolecules AT settealessandro communityresourcebenchmarkingpredictionsofpeptidebindingtomhcimolecules |