Cargando…

Moving Forward Moving Backward: Directional Sorting of Chemotactic Cells due to Size and Adhesion Differences

Differential movement of individual cells within tissues is an important yet poorly understood process in biological development. Here we present a computational study of cell sorting caused by a combination of cell adhesion and chemotaxis, where we assume that all cells respond equally to the chemo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Käfer, Jos, Hogeweg, Paulien, Marée, Athanasius F. M
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1475715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16789822
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020056
_version_ 1782128140807569408
author Käfer, Jos
Hogeweg, Paulien
Marée, Athanasius F. M
author_facet Käfer, Jos
Hogeweg, Paulien
Marée, Athanasius F. M
author_sort Käfer, Jos
collection PubMed
description Differential movement of individual cells within tissues is an important yet poorly understood process in biological development. Here we present a computational study of cell sorting caused by a combination of cell adhesion and chemotaxis, where we assume that all cells respond equally to the chemotactic signal. To capture in our model mesoscopic properties of biological cells, such as their size and deformability, we use the Cellular Potts Model, a multiscale, cell-based Monte Carlo model. We demonstrate a rich array of cell-sorting phenomena, which depend on a combination of mescoscopic cell properties and tissue level constraints. Under the conditions studied, cell sorting is a fast process, which scales linearly with tissue size. We demonstrate the occurrence of “absolute negative mobility”, which means that cells may move in the direction opposite to the applied force (here chemotaxis). Moreover, during the sorting, cells may even reverse the direction of motion. Another interesting phenomenon is “minority sorting”, where the direction of movement does not depend on cell type, but on the frequency of the cell type in the tissue. A special case is the cAMP-wave-driven chemotaxis of Dictyostelium cells, which generates pressure waves that guide the sorting. The mechanisms we describe can easily be overlooked in studies of differential cell movement, hence certain experimental observations may be misinterpreted.
format Text
id pubmed-1475715
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-14757152006-06-09 Moving Forward Moving Backward: Directional Sorting of Chemotactic Cells due to Size and Adhesion Differences Käfer, Jos Hogeweg, Paulien Marée, Athanasius F. M PLoS Comput Biol Research Article Differential movement of individual cells within tissues is an important yet poorly understood process in biological development. Here we present a computational study of cell sorting caused by a combination of cell adhesion and chemotaxis, where we assume that all cells respond equally to the chemotactic signal. To capture in our model mesoscopic properties of biological cells, such as their size and deformability, we use the Cellular Potts Model, a multiscale, cell-based Monte Carlo model. We demonstrate a rich array of cell-sorting phenomena, which depend on a combination of mescoscopic cell properties and tissue level constraints. Under the conditions studied, cell sorting is a fast process, which scales linearly with tissue size. We demonstrate the occurrence of “absolute negative mobility”, which means that cells may move in the direction opposite to the applied force (here chemotaxis). Moreover, during the sorting, cells may even reverse the direction of motion. Another interesting phenomenon is “minority sorting”, where the direction of movement does not depend on cell type, but on the frequency of the cell type in the tissue. A special case is the cAMP-wave-driven chemotaxis of Dictyostelium cells, which generates pressure waves that guide the sorting. The mechanisms we describe can easily be overlooked in studies of differential cell movement, hence certain experimental observations may be misinterpreted. Public Library of Science 2006-06 2006-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC1475715/ /pubmed/16789822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020056 Text en © 2006 Käfer et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Käfer, Jos
Hogeweg, Paulien
Marée, Athanasius F. M
Moving Forward Moving Backward: Directional Sorting of Chemotactic Cells due to Size and Adhesion Differences
title Moving Forward Moving Backward: Directional Sorting of Chemotactic Cells due to Size and Adhesion Differences
title_full Moving Forward Moving Backward: Directional Sorting of Chemotactic Cells due to Size and Adhesion Differences
title_fullStr Moving Forward Moving Backward: Directional Sorting of Chemotactic Cells due to Size and Adhesion Differences
title_full_unstemmed Moving Forward Moving Backward: Directional Sorting of Chemotactic Cells due to Size and Adhesion Differences
title_short Moving Forward Moving Backward: Directional Sorting of Chemotactic Cells due to Size and Adhesion Differences
title_sort moving forward moving backward: directional sorting of chemotactic cells due to size and adhesion differences
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1475715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16789822
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020056
work_keys_str_mv AT kaferjos movingforwardmovingbackwarddirectionalsortingofchemotacticcellsduetosizeandadhesiondifferences
AT hogewegpaulien movingforwardmovingbackwarddirectionalsortingofchemotacticcellsduetosizeandadhesiondifferences
AT mareeathanasiusfm movingforwardmovingbackwarddirectionalsortingofchemotacticcellsduetosizeandadhesiondifferences