Cargando…
Comparison of the SF-6D and the EQ-5D in patients with coronary heart disease
BACKGROUND: The SF-6D was derived from the SF-36. A single summary score is obtained allegedly preserving the descriptive richness and sensitivity to change of the SF-36 into utility measurement. We compared the SF-6D and EQ-5D on domain content, scoring distribution, pre-treatment and change scores...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1475841/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16563170 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-4-20 |
_version_ | 1782128154242973696 |
---|---|
author | van Stel, Henk F Buskens, Erik |
author_facet | van Stel, Henk F Buskens, Erik |
author_sort | van Stel, Henk F |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The SF-6D was derived from the SF-36. A single summary score is obtained allegedly preserving the descriptive richness and sensitivity to change of the SF-36 into utility measurement. We compared the SF-6D and EQ-5D on domain content, scoring distribution, pre-treatment and change scores. METHODS: The SF-6D and the EQ-5D were completed prior to intervention and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post-intervention in a study enrolling 561 patients with symptomatic coronary stenosis. Patients were randomized to off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG), standard on-pump CABG, or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Baseline and change over time scores were compared using parametric and non-parametric tests. RESULTS: The relative contribution of similar domains measuring daily functioning to the utility scores differed substantially. SF-6D focused more on social functioning, while EQ-5D gave more weight to physical functioning. Pain and mental health had similar contributions. The scoring range of the EQ-5D was twice the range of the SF-6D. Before treatment, EQ-5D and SF-6D mean scores appeared similar (0.64 versus 0.63, p = 0.09). Median scores, however, differed substantially (0.69 versus 0.60), a difference exceeding the minimal important difference of both instruments. Agreement was low, with an intra-class correlation of 0.45. Finally, we found large differences in measuring change over time. The SF-6D recorded greater intra-subject change in the PTCA-group. Only the EQ-5D recorded significant change in the CABG-groups. In the latter groups changes in SF-6D domains cancelled each other out. CONCLUSION: Although both instruments appear to measure similar constructs, the EQ-5D and SF-6D are quite different. The low agreement and the differences in median values, scoring range and sensitivity to change after intervention show that the EQ-5D and SF-6D yield incomparable scores in patients with coronary heart disease. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1475841 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-14758412006-06-10 Comparison of the SF-6D and the EQ-5D in patients with coronary heart disease van Stel, Henk F Buskens, Erik Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: The SF-6D was derived from the SF-36. A single summary score is obtained allegedly preserving the descriptive richness and sensitivity to change of the SF-36 into utility measurement. We compared the SF-6D and EQ-5D on domain content, scoring distribution, pre-treatment and change scores. METHODS: The SF-6D and the EQ-5D were completed prior to intervention and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post-intervention in a study enrolling 561 patients with symptomatic coronary stenosis. Patients were randomized to off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG), standard on-pump CABG, or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Baseline and change over time scores were compared using parametric and non-parametric tests. RESULTS: The relative contribution of similar domains measuring daily functioning to the utility scores differed substantially. SF-6D focused more on social functioning, while EQ-5D gave more weight to physical functioning. Pain and mental health had similar contributions. The scoring range of the EQ-5D was twice the range of the SF-6D. Before treatment, EQ-5D and SF-6D mean scores appeared similar (0.64 versus 0.63, p = 0.09). Median scores, however, differed substantially (0.69 versus 0.60), a difference exceeding the minimal important difference of both instruments. Agreement was low, with an intra-class correlation of 0.45. Finally, we found large differences in measuring change over time. The SF-6D recorded greater intra-subject change in the PTCA-group. Only the EQ-5D recorded significant change in the CABG-groups. In the latter groups changes in SF-6D domains cancelled each other out. CONCLUSION: Although both instruments appear to measure similar constructs, the EQ-5D and SF-6D are quite different. The low agreement and the differences in median values, scoring range and sensitivity to change after intervention show that the EQ-5D and SF-6D yield incomparable scores in patients with coronary heart disease. BioMed Central 2006-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC1475841/ /pubmed/16563170 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-4-20 Text en Copyright © 2006 van Stel and Buskens; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research van Stel, Henk F Buskens, Erik Comparison of the SF-6D and the EQ-5D in patients with coronary heart disease |
title | Comparison of the SF-6D and the EQ-5D in patients with coronary heart disease |
title_full | Comparison of the SF-6D and the EQ-5D in patients with coronary heart disease |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the SF-6D and the EQ-5D in patients with coronary heart disease |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the SF-6D and the EQ-5D in patients with coronary heart disease |
title_short | Comparison of the SF-6D and the EQ-5D in patients with coronary heart disease |
title_sort | comparison of the sf-6d and the eq-5d in patients with coronary heart disease |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1475841/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16563170 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-4-20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanstelhenkf comparisonofthesf6dandtheeq5dinpatientswithcoronaryheartdisease AT buskenserik comparisonofthesf6dandtheeq5dinpatientswithcoronaryheartdisease |