Cargando…

Economic evaluations of non-communicable disease interventions in developing countries: a critical review of the evidence base

BACKGROUND: Demographic projections suggest a major increase in non-communicable disease (NCD) mortality over the next two decades in developing countries. In a climate of scarce resources, policy-makers need to know which interventions represent value for money. The prohibitive cost of performing m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mulligan, Jo-Ann, Walker, Damian, Fox-Rushby, Julia
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1479369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16584546
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-4-7
_version_ 1782128187725053952
author Mulligan, Jo-Ann
Walker, Damian
Fox-Rushby, Julia
author_facet Mulligan, Jo-Ann
Walker, Damian
Fox-Rushby, Julia
author_sort Mulligan, Jo-Ann
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Demographic projections suggest a major increase in non-communicable disease (NCD) mortality over the next two decades in developing countries. In a climate of scarce resources, policy-makers need to know which interventions represent value for money. The prohibitive cost of performing multiple economic evaluations has generated interest in transferring the results of studies from one setting to another. This paper aims to bridge the gap in the current literature by critically evaluating the available published data on economic evaluations of NCD interventions in developing countries. METHODS: We identified and reviewed the methodological quality of 32 economic evaluations of NCD interventions in developing countries. Developing countries were defined according to the World Bank classification for low- and lower middle-income countries. We defined NCDs as the 12 categories listed in the 1993 World Bank report Investing in Health. English language literature was searched for the period January 1984 and January 2003 inclusive in Medline, Science Citation Index, HealthStar, NHS Economic Evaluation Database and Embase using medical subheading terms and free text searches. We then assessed the quality of studies according to a set of pre-defined technical criteria. RESULTS: We found that the quality of studies was poor and resource allocation decisions made by local and global policy-makers on the basis of this evidence could be misleading. Furthermore we have identified some clear gaps in the literature, particularly around injuries and strategies for tackling the consequences of the emerging tobacco epidemic. CONCLUSION: In the face of poor evidence the role of so-called generalised cost-effectiveness analyses has an important role to play in aiding public health decision-making at the global level. Further research is needed to investigates the causes of variation among cost, effects and cost-effectiveness data within and between settings. Such analyses still need to take a broad view, present data in a transparent manner and take account of local constraints.
format Text
id pubmed-1479369
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-14793692006-06-15 Economic evaluations of non-communicable disease interventions in developing countries: a critical review of the evidence base Mulligan, Jo-Ann Walker, Damian Fox-Rushby, Julia Cost Eff Resour Alloc Review BACKGROUND: Demographic projections suggest a major increase in non-communicable disease (NCD) mortality over the next two decades in developing countries. In a climate of scarce resources, policy-makers need to know which interventions represent value for money. The prohibitive cost of performing multiple economic evaluations has generated interest in transferring the results of studies from one setting to another. This paper aims to bridge the gap in the current literature by critically evaluating the available published data on economic evaluations of NCD interventions in developing countries. METHODS: We identified and reviewed the methodological quality of 32 economic evaluations of NCD interventions in developing countries. Developing countries were defined according to the World Bank classification for low- and lower middle-income countries. We defined NCDs as the 12 categories listed in the 1993 World Bank report Investing in Health. English language literature was searched for the period January 1984 and January 2003 inclusive in Medline, Science Citation Index, HealthStar, NHS Economic Evaluation Database and Embase using medical subheading terms and free text searches. We then assessed the quality of studies according to a set of pre-defined technical criteria. RESULTS: We found that the quality of studies was poor and resource allocation decisions made by local and global policy-makers on the basis of this evidence could be misleading. Furthermore we have identified some clear gaps in the literature, particularly around injuries and strategies for tackling the consequences of the emerging tobacco epidemic. CONCLUSION: In the face of poor evidence the role of so-called generalised cost-effectiveness analyses has an important role to play in aiding public health decision-making at the global level. Further research is needed to investigates the causes of variation among cost, effects and cost-effectiveness data within and between settings. Such analyses still need to take a broad view, present data in a transparent manner and take account of local constraints. BioMed Central 2006-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC1479369/ /pubmed/16584546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-4-7 Text en Copyright © 2006 Mulligan et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Mulligan, Jo-Ann
Walker, Damian
Fox-Rushby, Julia
Economic evaluations of non-communicable disease interventions in developing countries: a critical review of the evidence base
title Economic evaluations of non-communicable disease interventions in developing countries: a critical review of the evidence base
title_full Economic evaluations of non-communicable disease interventions in developing countries: a critical review of the evidence base
title_fullStr Economic evaluations of non-communicable disease interventions in developing countries: a critical review of the evidence base
title_full_unstemmed Economic evaluations of non-communicable disease interventions in developing countries: a critical review of the evidence base
title_short Economic evaluations of non-communicable disease interventions in developing countries: a critical review of the evidence base
title_sort economic evaluations of non-communicable disease interventions in developing countries: a critical review of the evidence base
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1479369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16584546
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-4-7
work_keys_str_mv AT mulliganjoann economicevaluationsofnoncommunicablediseaseinterventionsindevelopingcountriesacriticalreviewoftheevidencebase
AT walkerdamian economicevaluationsofnoncommunicablediseaseinterventionsindevelopingcountriesacriticalreviewoftheevidencebase
AT foxrushbyjulia economicevaluationsofnoncommunicablediseaseinterventionsindevelopingcountriesacriticalreviewoftheevidencebase