Cargando…

Identification and evolutionary analysis of novel exons and alternative splicing events using cross-species EST-to-genome comparisons in human, mouse and rat

BACKGROUND: Alternative splicing (AS) is important for evolution and major biological functions in complex organisms. However, the extent of AS in mammals other than human and mouse is largely unknown, making it difficult to study AS evolution in mammals and its biomedical implications. RESULTS: Her...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Feng-Chi, Chen, Chuang-Jong, Ho, Jar-Yi, Chuang, Trees-Juen
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1479377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16536879
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-136
_version_ 1782128189700571136
author Chen, Feng-Chi
Chen, Chuang-Jong
Ho, Jar-Yi
Chuang, Trees-Juen
author_facet Chen, Feng-Chi
Chen, Chuang-Jong
Ho, Jar-Yi
Chuang, Trees-Juen
author_sort Chen, Feng-Chi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Alternative splicing (AS) is important for evolution and major biological functions in complex organisms. However, the extent of AS in mammals other than human and mouse is largely unknown, making it difficult to study AS evolution in mammals and its biomedical implications. RESULTS: Here we describe a cross-species EST-to-genome comparison algorithm (ENACE) that can identify novel exons for EST-scanty species and distinguish conserved and lineage-specific exons. The identified exons represent not only novel exons but also evolutionarily meaningful AS events that are not previously annotated. A genome-wide AS analysis in human, mouse and rat using ENACE reveals a total of 758 novel cassette-on exons and 167 novel retained introns that have no EST evidence from the same species. RT-PCR-sequencing experiments validated ~50 ~80% of the tested exons, indicating high presence of exons predicted by ENACE. ENACE is particularly powerful when applied to closely related species. In addition, our analysis shows that the ENACE-identified AS exons tend not to pass the nonsynonymous-to-synonymous substitution ratio test and not to contain protein domain, implying that such exons may be under positive selection or relaxed negative selection. These AS exons may contribute to considerable inter-species functional divergence. Our analysis further indicates that a large number of exons may have been gained or lost during mammalian evolution. Moreover, a functional analysis shows that inter-species divergence of AS events may be substantial in protein carriers and receptor proteins in mammals. These exons may be of interest to studies of AS evolution. The ENACE programs and sequences of the ENACE-identified AS events are available for download. CONCLUSION: ENACE can identify potential novel cassette exons and retained introns between closely related species using a comparative approach. It can also provide information regarding lineage- or species-specificity in transcript isoforms, which are important for evolutionary and functional studies.
format Text
id pubmed-1479377
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-14793772006-06-15 Identification and evolutionary analysis of novel exons and alternative splicing events using cross-species EST-to-genome comparisons in human, mouse and rat Chen, Feng-Chi Chen, Chuang-Jong Ho, Jar-Yi Chuang, Trees-Juen BMC Bioinformatics Research Article BACKGROUND: Alternative splicing (AS) is important for evolution and major biological functions in complex organisms. However, the extent of AS in mammals other than human and mouse is largely unknown, making it difficult to study AS evolution in mammals and its biomedical implications. RESULTS: Here we describe a cross-species EST-to-genome comparison algorithm (ENACE) that can identify novel exons for EST-scanty species and distinguish conserved and lineage-specific exons. The identified exons represent not only novel exons but also evolutionarily meaningful AS events that are not previously annotated. A genome-wide AS analysis in human, mouse and rat using ENACE reveals a total of 758 novel cassette-on exons and 167 novel retained introns that have no EST evidence from the same species. RT-PCR-sequencing experiments validated ~50 ~80% of the tested exons, indicating high presence of exons predicted by ENACE. ENACE is particularly powerful when applied to closely related species. In addition, our analysis shows that the ENACE-identified AS exons tend not to pass the nonsynonymous-to-synonymous substitution ratio test and not to contain protein domain, implying that such exons may be under positive selection or relaxed negative selection. These AS exons may contribute to considerable inter-species functional divergence. Our analysis further indicates that a large number of exons may have been gained or lost during mammalian evolution. Moreover, a functional analysis shows that inter-species divergence of AS events may be substantial in protein carriers and receptor proteins in mammals. These exons may be of interest to studies of AS evolution. The ENACE programs and sequences of the ENACE-identified AS events are available for download. CONCLUSION: ENACE can identify potential novel cassette exons and retained introns between closely related species using a comparative approach. It can also provide information regarding lineage- or species-specificity in transcript isoforms, which are important for evolutionary and functional studies. BioMed Central 2006-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC1479377/ /pubmed/16536879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-136 Text en Copyright © 2006 Chen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chen, Feng-Chi
Chen, Chuang-Jong
Ho, Jar-Yi
Chuang, Trees-Juen
Identification and evolutionary analysis of novel exons and alternative splicing events using cross-species EST-to-genome comparisons in human, mouse and rat
title Identification and evolutionary analysis of novel exons and alternative splicing events using cross-species EST-to-genome comparisons in human, mouse and rat
title_full Identification and evolutionary analysis of novel exons and alternative splicing events using cross-species EST-to-genome comparisons in human, mouse and rat
title_fullStr Identification and evolutionary analysis of novel exons and alternative splicing events using cross-species EST-to-genome comparisons in human, mouse and rat
title_full_unstemmed Identification and evolutionary analysis of novel exons and alternative splicing events using cross-species EST-to-genome comparisons in human, mouse and rat
title_short Identification and evolutionary analysis of novel exons and alternative splicing events using cross-species EST-to-genome comparisons in human, mouse and rat
title_sort identification and evolutionary analysis of novel exons and alternative splicing events using cross-species est-to-genome comparisons in human, mouse and rat
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1479377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16536879
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-136
work_keys_str_mv AT chenfengchi identificationandevolutionaryanalysisofnovelexonsandalternativesplicingeventsusingcrossspeciesesttogenomecomparisonsinhumanmouseandrat
AT chenchuangjong identificationandevolutionaryanalysisofnovelexonsandalternativesplicingeventsusingcrossspeciesesttogenomecomparisonsinhumanmouseandrat
AT hojaryi identificationandevolutionaryanalysisofnovelexonsandalternativesplicingeventsusingcrossspeciesesttogenomecomparisonsinhumanmouseandrat
AT chuangtreesjuen identificationandevolutionaryanalysisofnovelexonsandalternativesplicingeventsusingcrossspeciesesttogenomecomparisonsinhumanmouseandrat