Cargando…
Are reviewers suggested by authors as good as those chosen by editors? Results of a rater-blinded, retrospective study
BACKGROUND: BioMed Central (BMC) requires authors to suggest four reviewers when making a submission. Editors searching for reviewers use these suggestions as a source. The review process of the medical journals in the BMC series is open – authors and reviewers know each other's identity – alth...
Autores principales: | Wager, Elizabeth, Parkin, Emma C, Tamber, Pritpal S |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1482713/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16734897 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-4-13 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Critical Care: a good scientific citizen just got better
por: Tamber, Pritpal S, et al.
Publicado: (2003) -
Scientific quality assurance, II: Group 6
por: Tamber, Pritpal
Publicado: (2007) -
Too much of a good thing? An observational study of prolific authors
por: Wager, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Why do we need international standards on responsible research publication for authors and editors?
por: Wager, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Critical Care's move to fund open access
por: Slade, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2003)