Cargando…
The insecure airway: a comparison of knots and commercial devices for securing endotracheal tubes
BACKGROUND: Endotracheal Tubes (ETTs) are commonly secured using adhesive tape, cloth tape, or commercial devices. The objectives of the study were (1) To compare degrees of movement of ETTs secured with 6 different commercial devices and (2) To compare movement of ETTs secured with cloth tape tied...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1483826/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16723027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-227X-6-7 |
_version_ | 1782128309369307136 |
---|---|
author | Lovett, Paris B Flaxman, Alexander Stürmann, Kai M Bijur, Polly |
author_facet | Lovett, Paris B Flaxman, Alexander Stürmann, Kai M Bijur, Polly |
author_sort | Lovett, Paris B |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Endotracheal Tubes (ETTs) are commonly secured using adhesive tape, cloth tape, or commercial devices. The objectives of the study were (1) To compare degrees of movement of ETTs secured with 6 different commercial devices and (2) To compare movement of ETTs secured with cloth tape tied with 3 different knots (hitches). METHODS: A 17 cm diameter PVC tube with 14 mm "mouth" hole in the side served as a mannequin. ETTs were subjected to repeated jerks, using a cable and pulley system. Measurements: (1) Total movement of ETTs relative to "mouth" (measure used for devices) (2) Slippage of ETT through securing knot (measure used for knots). RESULTS: Among commercial devices, the Dale(® )showed less movement than other devices, although some differences between devices did not reach significance. Among knots, Magnus and Clove Hitches produced less slippage than the Cow Hitch, but these differences did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Among devices tested, the Dale(® )was most secure. Within the scope offered by the small sample sizes, there were no statistically significant differences between the knots in this study. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1483826 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-14838262006-06-29 The insecure airway: a comparison of knots and commercial devices for securing endotracheal tubes Lovett, Paris B Flaxman, Alexander Stürmann, Kai M Bijur, Polly BMC Emerg Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Endotracheal Tubes (ETTs) are commonly secured using adhesive tape, cloth tape, or commercial devices. The objectives of the study were (1) To compare degrees of movement of ETTs secured with 6 different commercial devices and (2) To compare movement of ETTs secured with cloth tape tied with 3 different knots (hitches). METHODS: A 17 cm diameter PVC tube with 14 mm "mouth" hole in the side served as a mannequin. ETTs were subjected to repeated jerks, using a cable and pulley system. Measurements: (1) Total movement of ETTs relative to "mouth" (measure used for devices) (2) Slippage of ETT through securing knot (measure used for knots). RESULTS: Among commercial devices, the Dale(® )showed less movement than other devices, although some differences between devices did not reach significance. Among knots, Magnus and Clove Hitches produced less slippage than the Cow Hitch, but these differences did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Among devices tested, the Dale(® )was most secure. Within the scope offered by the small sample sizes, there were no statistically significant differences between the knots in this study. BioMed Central 2006-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC1483826/ /pubmed/16723027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-227X-6-7 Text en Copyright © 2006 Lovett et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lovett, Paris B Flaxman, Alexander Stürmann, Kai M Bijur, Polly The insecure airway: a comparison of knots and commercial devices for securing endotracheal tubes |
title | The insecure airway: a comparison of knots and commercial devices for securing endotracheal tubes |
title_full | The insecure airway: a comparison of knots and commercial devices for securing endotracheal tubes |
title_fullStr | The insecure airway: a comparison of knots and commercial devices for securing endotracheal tubes |
title_full_unstemmed | The insecure airway: a comparison of knots and commercial devices for securing endotracheal tubes |
title_short | The insecure airway: a comparison of knots and commercial devices for securing endotracheal tubes |
title_sort | insecure airway: a comparison of knots and commercial devices for securing endotracheal tubes |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1483826/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16723027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-227X-6-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lovettparisb theinsecureairwayacomparisonofknotsandcommercialdevicesforsecuringendotrachealtubes AT flaxmanalexander theinsecureairwayacomparisonofknotsandcommercialdevicesforsecuringendotrachealtubes AT sturmannkaim theinsecureairwayacomparisonofknotsandcommercialdevicesforsecuringendotrachealtubes AT bijurpolly theinsecureairwayacomparisonofknotsandcommercialdevicesforsecuringendotrachealtubes AT lovettparisb insecureairwayacomparisonofknotsandcommercialdevicesforsecuringendotrachealtubes AT flaxmanalexander insecureairwayacomparisonofknotsandcommercialdevicesforsecuringendotrachealtubes AT sturmannkaim insecureairwayacomparisonofknotsandcommercialdevicesforsecuringendotrachealtubes AT bijurpolly insecureairwayacomparisonofknotsandcommercialdevicesforsecuringendotrachealtubes |