Cargando…

The insecure airway: a comparison of knots and commercial devices for securing endotracheal tubes

BACKGROUND: Endotracheal Tubes (ETTs) are commonly secured using adhesive tape, cloth tape, or commercial devices. The objectives of the study were (1) To compare degrees of movement of ETTs secured with 6 different commercial devices and (2) To compare movement of ETTs secured with cloth tape tied...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lovett, Paris B, Flaxman, Alexander, Stürmann, Kai M, Bijur, Polly
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1483826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16723027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-227X-6-7
_version_ 1782128309369307136
author Lovett, Paris B
Flaxman, Alexander
Stürmann, Kai M
Bijur, Polly
author_facet Lovett, Paris B
Flaxman, Alexander
Stürmann, Kai M
Bijur, Polly
author_sort Lovett, Paris B
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Endotracheal Tubes (ETTs) are commonly secured using adhesive tape, cloth tape, or commercial devices. The objectives of the study were (1) To compare degrees of movement of ETTs secured with 6 different commercial devices and (2) To compare movement of ETTs secured with cloth tape tied with 3 different knots (hitches). METHODS: A 17 cm diameter PVC tube with 14 mm "mouth" hole in the side served as a mannequin. ETTs were subjected to repeated jerks, using a cable and pulley system. Measurements: (1) Total movement of ETTs relative to "mouth" (measure used for devices) (2) Slippage of ETT through securing knot (measure used for knots). RESULTS: Among commercial devices, the Dale(® )showed less movement than other devices, although some differences between devices did not reach significance. Among knots, Magnus and Clove Hitches produced less slippage than the Cow Hitch, but these differences did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Among devices tested, the Dale(® )was most secure. Within the scope offered by the small sample sizes, there were no statistically significant differences between the knots in this study.
format Text
id pubmed-1483826
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-14838262006-06-29 The insecure airway: a comparison of knots and commercial devices for securing endotracheal tubes Lovett, Paris B Flaxman, Alexander Stürmann, Kai M Bijur, Polly BMC Emerg Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Endotracheal Tubes (ETTs) are commonly secured using adhesive tape, cloth tape, or commercial devices. The objectives of the study were (1) To compare degrees of movement of ETTs secured with 6 different commercial devices and (2) To compare movement of ETTs secured with cloth tape tied with 3 different knots (hitches). METHODS: A 17 cm diameter PVC tube with 14 mm "mouth" hole in the side served as a mannequin. ETTs were subjected to repeated jerks, using a cable and pulley system. Measurements: (1) Total movement of ETTs relative to "mouth" (measure used for devices) (2) Slippage of ETT through securing knot (measure used for knots). RESULTS: Among commercial devices, the Dale(® )showed less movement than other devices, although some differences between devices did not reach significance. Among knots, Magnus and Clove Hitches produced less slippage than the Cow Hitch, but these differences did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Among devices tested, the Dale(® )was most secure. Within the scope offered by the small sample sizes, there were no statistically significant differences between the knots in this study. BioMed Central 2006-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC1483826/ /pubmed/16723027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-227X-6-7 Text en Copyright © 2006 Lovett et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lovett, Paris B
Flaxman, Alexander
Stürmann, Kai M
Bijur, Polly
The insecure airway: a comparison of knots and commercial devices for securing endotracheal tubes
title The insecure airway: a comparison of knots and commercial devices for securing endotracheal tubes
title_full The insecure airway: a comparison of knots and commercial devices for securing endotracheal tubes
title_fullStr The insecure airway: a comparison of knots and commercial devices for securing endotracheal tubes
title_full_unstemmed The insecure airway: a comparison of knots and commercial devices for securing endotracheal tubes
title_short The insecure airway: a comparison of knots and commercial devices for securing endotracheal tubes
title_sort insecure airway: a comparison of knots and commercial devices for securing endotracheal tubes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1483826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16723027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-227X-6-7
work_keys_str_mv AT lovettparisb theinsecureairwayacomparisonofknotsandcommercialdevicesforsecuringendotrachealtubes
AT flaxmanalexander theinsecureairwayacomparisonofknotsandcommercialdevicesforsecuringendotrachealtubes
AT sturmannkaim theinsecureairwayacomparisonofknotsandcommercialdevicesforsecuringendotrachealtubes
AT bijurpolly theinsecureairwayacomparisonofknotsandcommercialdevicesforsecuringendotrachealtubes
AT lovettparisb insecureairwayacomparisonofknotsandcommercialdevicesforsecuringendotrachealtubes
AT flaxmanalexander insecureairwayacomparisonofknotsandcommercialdevicesforsecuringendotrachealtubes
AT sturmannkaim insecureairwayacomparisonofknotsandcommercialdevicesforsecuringendotrachealtubes
AT bijurpolly insecureairwayacomparisonofknotsandcommercialdevicesforsecuringendotrachealtubes