Cargando…

Optimizing search strategies to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE

BACKGROUND: The Cochrane Highly Sensitive Search Strategy (HSSS), which contains three phases, is widely used to identify Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) in MEDLINE. Lefebvre and Clarke suggest that reviewers might consider using four revisions of the HSSS. The objective of this study is to vali...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Li, Ajiferuke, Isola, Sampson, Margaret
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1488863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16684359
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-6-23
_version_ 1782128351208538112
author Zhang, Li
Ajiferuke, Isola
Sampson, Margaret
author_facet Zhang, Li
Ajiferuke, Isola
Sampson, Margaret
author_sort Zhang, Li
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Cochrane Highly Sensitive Search Strategy (HSSS), which contains three phases, is widely used to identify Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) in MEDLINE. Lefebvre and Clarke suggest that reviewers might consider using four revisions of the HSSS. The objective of this study is to validate these four revisions: combining the free text terms volunteer, crossover, versus, and the Medical Subject Heading CROSS-OVER STUDIES with the top two phases of the HSSS, respectively. METHODS: We replicated the subject search for 61 Cochrane reviews. The included studies of each review that were indexed in MEDLINE were pooled together by review and then combined with the subject search and each of the four proposed search strategies, the top two phases of the HSSS, and all three phases of the HSSS. These retrievals were used to calculate the sensitivity and precision of each of the six search strategies for each review. RESULTS: Across the 61 reviews, the search term versus combined with the top two phases of the HSSS was able to find 3 more included studies than the top two phases of the HSSS alone, or in combination with any of the other proposed search terms, but at the expense of missing 56 relevant articles that would be found if all three phases of the HSSS were used. The estimated time needed to finish a review is 1086 hours for all three phases of the HSSS, 823 hours for the strategy versus, 818 hours for the first two phases of the HSSS or any of the other three proposed strategies. CONCLUSION: This study shows that compared to the first two phases of the HSSS, adding the term versus to the top two phases of the HSSS balances the sensitivity and precision in the reviews studied here to some extent but the differences are very small. It is well known that missing relevant studies may result in bias in systematic reviews. Reviewers need to weigh the trade-offs when selecting the search strategies for identifying RCTs in MEDLINE.
format Text
id pubmed-1488863
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-14888632006-07-10 Optimizing search strategies to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE Zhang, Li Ajiferuke, Isola Sampson, Margaret BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: The Cochrane Highly Sensitive Search Strategy (HSSS), which contains three phases, is widely used to identify Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) in MEDLINE. Lefebvre and Clarke suggest that reviewers might consider using four revisions of the HSSS. The objective of this study is to validate these four revisions: combining the free text terms volunteer, crossover, versus, and the Medical Subject Heading CROSS-OVER STUDIES with the top two phases of the HSSS, respectively. METHODS: We replicated the subject search for 61 Cochrane reviews. The included studies of each review that were indexed in MEDLINE were pooled together by review and then combined with the subject search and each of the four proposed search strategies, the top two phases of the HSSS, and all three phases of the HSSS. These retrievals were used to calculate the sensitivity and precision of each of the six search strategies for each review. RESULTS: Across the 61 reviews, the search term versus combined with the top two phases of the HSSS was able to find 3 more included studies than the top two phases of the HSSS alone, or in combination with any of the other proposed search terms, but at the expense of missing 56 relevant articles that would be found if all three phases of the HSSS were used. The estimated time needed to finish a review is 1086 hours for all three phases of the HSSS, 823 hours for the strategy versus, 818 hours for the first two phases of the HSSS or any of the other three proposed strategies. CONCLUSION: This study shows that compared to the first two phases of the HSSS, adding the term versus to the top two phases of the HSSS balances the sensitivity and precision in the reviews studied here to some extent but the differences are very small. It is well known that missing relevant studies may result in bias in systematic reviews. Reviewers need to weigh the trade-offs when selecting the search strategies for identifying RCTs in MEDLINE. BioMed Central 2006-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC1488863/ /pubmed/16684359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-6-23 Text en Copyright © 2006 Zhang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhang, Li
Ajiferuke, Isola
Sampson, Margaret
Optimizing search strategies to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE
title Optimizing search strategies to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE
title_full Optimizing search strategies to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE
title_fullStr Optimizing search strategies to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE
title_full_unstemmed Optimizing search strategies to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE
title_short Optimizing search strategies to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE
title_sort optimizing search strategies to identify randomized controlled trials in medline
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1488863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16684359
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-6-23
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangli optimizingsearchstrategiestoidentifyrandomizedcontrolledtrialsinmedline
AT ajiferukeisola optimizingsearchstrategiestoidentifyrandomizedcontrolledtrialsinmedline
AT sampsonmargaret optimizingsearchstrategiestoidentifyrandomizedcontrolledtrialsinmedline