Cargando…

Flexible promoter architecture requirements for coactivator recruitment

BACKGROUND: The spatial organization of transcription factor binding sites in regulatory DNA, and the composition of intersite sequences, influences the assembly of the multiprotein complexes that regulate RNA polymerase recruitment and thereby affects transcription. We have developed a genetic appr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chiang, Derek Y, Nix, David A, Shultzaberger, Ryan K, Gasch, Audrey P, Eisen, Michael B
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1488866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16646957
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2199-7-16
_version_ 1782128351934152704
author Chiang, Derek Y
Nix, David A
Shultzaberger, Ryan K
Gasch, Audrey P
Eisen, Michael B
author_facet Chiang, Derek Y
Nix, David A
Shultzaberger, Ryan K
Gasch, Audrey P
Eisen, Michael B
author_sort Chiang, Derek Y
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The spatial organization of transcription factor binding sites in regulatory DNA, and the composition of intersite sequences, influences the assembly of the multiprotein complexes that regulate RNA polymerase recruitment and thereby affects transcription. We have developed a genetic approach to investigate how reporter gene transcription is affected by varying the spacing between transcription factor binding sites. We characterized the components of promoter architecture that govern the yeast transcription factors Cbf1 and Met31/32, which bind independently, but collaboratively recruit the coactivator Met4. RESULTS: A Cbf1 binding site was required upstream of a Met31/32 binding site for full reporter gene expression. Distance constraints on coactivator recruitment were more flexible than those for cooperatively binding transcription factors. Distances from 18 to 50 bp between binding sites support efficient recruitment of Met4, with only slight modulation by helical phasing. Intriguingly, we found that certain sequences located between the binding sites abolished gene expression. CONCLUSION: These results yield insight to the influence of both binding site architecture and local DNA flexibility on gene expression, and can be used to refine computational predictions of gene expression from promoter sequences. In addition, our approach can be applied to survey promoter architecture requirements for arbitrary combinations of transcription factor binding sites.
format Text
id pubmed-1488866
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-14888662006-07-06 Flexible promoter architecture requirements for coactivator recruitment Chiang, Derek Y Nix, David A Shultzaberger, Ryan K Gasch, Audrey P Eisen, Michael B BMC Mol Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: The spatial organization of transcription factor binding sites in regulatory DNA, and the composition of intersite sequences, influences the assembly of the multiprotein complexes that regulate RNA polymerase recruitment and thereby affects transcription. We have developed a genetic approach to investigate how reporter gene transcription is affected by varying the spacing between transcription factor binding sites. We characterized the components of promoter architecture that govern the yeast transcription factors Cbf1 and Met31/32, which bind independently, but collaboratively recruit the coactivator Met4. RESULTS: A Cbf1 binding site was required upstream of a Met31/32 binding site for full reporter gene expression. Distance constraints on coactivator recruitment were more flexible than those for cooperatively binding transcription factors. Distances from 18 to 50 bp between binding sites support efficient recruitment of Met4, with only slight modulation by helical phasing. Intriguingly, we found that certain sequences located between the binding sites abolished gene expression. CONCLUSION: These results yield insight to the influence of both binding site architecture and local DNA flexibility on gene expression, and can be used to refine computational predictions of gene expression from promoter sequences. In addition, our approach can be applied to survey promoter architecture requirements for arbitrary combinations of transcription factor binding sites. BioMed Central 2006-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC1488866/ /pubmed/16646957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2199-7-16 Text en Copyright © 2006 Chiang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chiang, Derek Y
Nix, David A
Shultzaberger, Ryan K
Gasch, Audrey P
Eisen, Michael B
Flexible promoter architecture requirements for coactivator recruitment
title Flexible promoter architecture requirements for coactivator recruitment
title_full Flexible promoter architecture requirements for coactivator recruitment
title_fullStr Flexible promoter architecture requirements for coactivator recruitment
title_full_unstemmed Flexible promoter architecture requirements for coactivator recruitment
title_short Flexible promoter architecture requirements for coactivator recruitment
title_sort flexible promoter architecture requirements for coactivator recruitment
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1488866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16646957
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2199-7-16
work_keys_str_mv AT chiangdereky flexiblepromoterarchitecturerequirementsforcoactivatorrecruitment
AT nixdavida flexiblepromoterarchitecturerequirementsforcoactivatorrecruitment
AT shultzabergerryank flexiblepromoterarchitecturerequirementsforcoactivatorrecruitment
AT gaschaudreyp flexiblepromoterarchitecturerequirementsforcoactivatorrecruitment
AT eisenmichaelb flexiblepromoterarchitecturerequirementsforcoactivatorrecruitment