Cargando…

Increasing participation of cancer patients in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: There are many barriers to patient participation in randomised controlled trials of cancer treatments. To increase participation in trials, strategies need to be identified to overcome these barriers. Our aim was to assess the effectiveness of interventions to overcome barriers to patien...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mc Daid, Catriona, Hodges, Zoé, Fayter, Debra, Stirk, Lisa, Eastwood, Alison
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1489947/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16707011
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-7-16
_version_ 1782128368662085632
author Mc Daid, Catriona
Hodges, Zoé
Fayter, Debra
Stirk, Lisa
Eastwood, Alison
author_facet Mc Daid, Catriona
Hodges, Zoé
Fayter, Debra
Stirk, Lisa
Eastwood, Alison
author_sort Mc Daid, Catriona
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There are many barriers to patient participation in randomised controlled trials of cancer treatments. To increase participation in trials, strategies need to be identified to overcome these barriers. Our aim was to assess the effectiveness of interventions to overcome barriers to patient participation in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of cancer treatments. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted. Published and unpublished studies in any language were searched for in fifteen electronic databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO, from inception to the end of 2004. Studies of any interventions to improve cancer patient participation in RCTs, which reported the change in recruitment rates, were eligible for inclusion. RCTs and non-randomised controlled trials as well as before and after studies reporting baseline rates specific to the population being investigated were included. Data were extracted by one reviewer into structured summary tables and checked for accuracy by a second reviewer. Each included study was assessed against a checklist for methodological quality by one reviewer and checked by a second reviewer. A narrative synthesis was conducted. RESULTS: Eight studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria: three RCTs, two non-randomised controlled trials and three observational studies. Six of the studies had an intervention that had some relevance to the UK. There was no robust evidence that any of the interventions investigated led to an increase in cancer patient participation in RCTs, though one good quality RCT found that urologists and nurses were equally effective at recruiting participants to a treatment trial for prostate cancer. Although there was no evidence of an effect in any of the studies, the evidence was not of sufficient quality to be able to conclude that these interventions therefore do not work. CONCLUSION: There is not a strong evidence-base for interventions that increase cancer patient participation in randomised trials. Further research is required to evaluate the effectiveness of strategies to increase participation in cancer treatment trials.
format Text
id pubmed-1489947
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-14899472006-07-08 Increasing participation of cancer patients in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review Mc Daid, Catriona Hodges, Zoé Fayter, Debra Stirk, Lisa Eastwood, Alison Trials Research BACKGROUND: There are many barriers to patient participation in randomised controlled trials of cancer treatments. To increase participation in trials, strategies need to be identified to overcome these barriers. Our aim was to assess the effectiveness of interventions to overcome barriers to patient participation in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of cancer treatments. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted. Published and unpublished studies in any language were searched for in fifteen electronic databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO, from inception to the end of 2004. Studies of any interventions to improve cancer patient participation in RCTs, which reported the change in recruitment rates, were eligible for inclusion. RCTs and non-randomised controlled trials as well as before and after studies reporting baseline rates specific to the population being investigated were included. Data were extracted by one reviewer into structured summary tables and checked for accuracy by a second reviewer. Each included study was assessed against a checklist for methodological quality by one reviewer and checked by a second reviewer. A narrative synthesis was conducted. RESULTS: Eight studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria: three RCTs, two non-randomised controlled trials and three observational studies. Six of the studies had an intervention that had some relevance to the UK. There was no robust evidence that any of the interventions investigated led to an increase in cancer patient participation in RCTs, though one good quality RCT found that urologists and nurses were equally effective at recruiting participants to a treatment trial for prostate cancer. Although there was no evidence of an effect in any of the studies, the evidence was not of sufficient quality to be able to conclude that these interventions therefore do not work. CONCLUSION: There is not a strong evidence-base for interventions that increase cancer patient participation in randomised trials. Further research is required to evaluate the effectiveness of strategies to increase participation in cancer treatment trials. BioMed Central 2006-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC1489947/ /pubmed/16707011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-7-16 Text en Copyright © 2006 Mc Daid et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Mc Daid, Catriona
Hodges, Zoé
Fayter, Debra
Stirk, Lisa
Eastwood, Alison
Increasing participation of cancer patients in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review
title Increasing participation of cancer patients in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review
title_full Increasing participation of cancer patients in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review
title_fullStr Increasing participation of cancer patients in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Increasing participation of cancer patients in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review
title_short Increasing participation of cancer patients in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review
title_sort increasing participation of cancer patients in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1489947/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16707011
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-7-16
work_keys_str_mv AT mcdaidcatriona increasingparticipationofcancerpatientsinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsasystematicreview
AT hodgeszoe increasingparticipationofcancerpatientsinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsasystematicreview
AT fayterdebra increasingparticipationofcancerpatientsinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsasystematicreview
AT stirklisa increasingparticipationofcancerpatientsinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsasystematicreview
AT eastwoodalison increasingparticipationofcancerpatientsinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsasystematicreview