Cargando…

Implementing guidelines in primary care: can population impact measures help?

BACKGROUND: Primary care organisations are faced with implementing a large number of guideline recommendations. We present methods by which the number of eligible patients requiring treatment, and the relative benefits to the whole population served by a general practice or Primary Care Trust, can b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heller, Richard F, Edwards, Richard, McElduff, Patrick
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC149228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12542840
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-3-7
_version_ 1782120614617677824
author Heller, Richard F
Edwards, Richard
McElduff, Patrick
author_facet Heller, Richard F
Edwards, Richard
McElduff, Patrick
author_sort Heller, Richard F
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Primary care organisations are faced with implementing a large number of guideline recommendations. We present methods by which the number of eligible patients requiring treatment, and the relative benefits to the whole population served by a general practice or Primary Care Trust, can be calculated to help prioritise between different guideline recommendations. METHODS: We have developed measures of population impact, "Number to be Treated in your Population (NTP)" and "Number of Events Prevented in your Population (NEPP)". Using literature-based estimates, we have applied these measures to guidelines for pharmacological methods of secondary prevention of myocardial infarction (MI) for a hypothetical general practice population of 10,000. RESULTS: Implementation of the NICE guidelines for the secondary prevention of MI will require 176 patients to be treated with aspirin, 147 patients with beta-blockers and with ACE-Inhibitors and 157 patients with statins (NTP). The benefit expressed as NEPP will range from 1.91 to 2.96 deaths prevented per year for aspirin and statins respectively. The drug cost per year varies from €1940 for aspirin to €60,525 for statins. Assuming incremental changes only (for those not already on treatment), aspirin post MI will be added for 37 patients and produce 0.40 of a death prevented per year at a drug cost of €410 and statins will be added for 120 patients and prevent 2.26 deaths per year at a drug cost of €46,150. An appropriate policy might be to reserve the use of statins until eligible patients have been established on aspirin, ACE-Inhibitors and beta blockers. CONCLUSIONS: The use of population impact measures could help the Primary Care Organisation to prioritise resource allocation, although the results will vary according to local conditions which should be taken into account before the measures are used in practice.
format Text
id pubmed-149228
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2003
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-1492282003-02-25 Implementing guidelines in primary care: can population impact measures help? Heller, Richard F Edwards, Richard McElduff, Patrick BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Primary care organisations are faced with implementing a large number of guideline recommendations. We present methods by which the number of eligible patients requiring treatment, and the relative benefits to the whole population served by a general practice or Primary Care Trust, can be calculated to help prioritise between different guideline recommendations. METHODS: We have developed measures of population impact, "Number to be Treated in your Population (NTP)" and "Number of Events Prevented in your Population (NEPP)". Using literature-based estimates, we have applied these measures to guidelines for pharmacological methods of secondary prevention of myocardial infarction (MI) for a hypothetical general practice population of 10,000. RESULTS: Implementation of the NICE guidelines for the secondary prevention of MI will require 176 patients to be treated with aspirin, 147 patients with beta-blockers and with ACE-Inhibitors and 157 patients with statins (NTP). The benefit expressed as NEPP will range from 1.91 to 2.96 deaths prevented per year for aspirin and statins respectively. The drug cost per year varies from €1940 for aspirin to €60,525 for statins. Assuming incremental changes only (for those not already on treatment), aspirin post MI will be added for 37 patients and produce 0.40 of a death prevented per year at a drug cost of €410 and statins will be added for 120 patients and prevent 2.26 deaths per year at a drug cost of €46,150. An appropriate policy might be to reserve the use of statins until eligible patients have been established on aspirin, ACE-Inhibitors and beta blockers. CONCLUSIONS: The use of population impact measures could help the Primary Care Organisation to prioritise resource allocation, although the results will vary according to local conditions which should be taken into account before the measures are used in practice. BioMed Central 2003-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC149228/ /pubmed/12542840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-3-7 Text en Copyright © 2003 Heller et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.
spellingShingle Research Article
Heller, Richard F
Edwards, Richard
McElduff, Patrick
Implementing guidelines in primary care: can population impact measures help?
title Implementing guidelines in primary care: can population impact measures help?
title_full Implementing guidelines in primary care: can population impact measures help?
title_fullStr Implementing guidelines in primary care: can population impact measures help?
title_full_unstemmed Implementing guidelines in primary care: can population impact measures help?
title_short Implementing guidelines in primary care: can population impact measures help?
title_sort implementing guidelines in primary care: can population impact measures help?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC149228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12542840
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-3-7
work_keys_str_mv AT hellerrichardf implementingguidelinesinprimarycarecanpopulationimpactmeasureshelp
AT edwardsrichard implementingguidelinesinprimarycarecanpopulationimpactmeasureshelp
AT mcelduffpatrick implementingguidelinesinprimarycarecanpopulationimpactmeasureshelp