Cargando…
Converting systematic reviews to Cochrane format: a cross-sectional survey of Australian authors of systematic reviews
BACKGROUND: Despite the growing reputation and subject coverage of the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, many systematic reviews continue to be published solely in paper-based health care journals. This study was designed to determine why authors choose to publish their systematic reviews out...
Autores principales: | Piehl, Janet H, Green, Sally, McDonald, Steve |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2003
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC149345/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12533194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-3-2 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Training practitioners in preparing systematic reviews: a cross-sectional survey of participants in the Australasian Cochrane Centre training program
por: Piehl, Janet H, et al.
Publicado: (2002) -
Investing in updating: how do conclusions change when Cochrane systematic reviews are updated?
por: French, Simon D, et al.
Publicado: (2005) -
Producing Cochrane systematic reviews—a qualitative study of current approaches and opportunities for innovation and improvement
por: Turner, Tari, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Assessing the magnitude of changes from protocol to publication—a survey on Cochrane and non-Cochrane Systematic Reviews
por: Siebert, Maximilian, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Cochrane methods - twenty years experience in developing systematic review methods
por: Chandler, Jackie, et al.
Publicado: (2013)