Cargando…
Development and evaluation of a quality score for abstracts
BACKGROUND: The evaluation of abstracts for scientific meetings has been shown to suffer from poor inter observer reliability. A measure was developed to assess the formal quality of abstract submissions in a standardized way. METHODS: Item selection was based on scoring systems for full reports, ta...
Autores principales: | Timmer, Antje, Sutherland, Lloyd R, Hilsden, Robert J |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2003
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC149448/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12581457 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-3-2 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Determinants of abstract acceptance for the Digestive Diseases Week – a cross sectional study
por: Timmer, Antje, et al.
Publicado: (2001) -
Publication bias in gastroenterological research – a retrospective cohort study based on abstracts submitted to a scientific meeting
por: Timmer, Antje, et al.
Publicado: (2002) -
A retrospective study on the use of post-operative colonoscopy following potentially curative surgery for colorectal cancer in a Canadian province
por: Hilsden, Robert J, et al.
Publicado: (2004) -
Endoscopist specialty is associated with colonoscopy quality
por: Jiang, Mengzhu, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Scheduling rules for patients with diabetes mellitus that facilitate split-dosing improve the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy
por: Hilsden, Robert J., et al.
Publicado: (2017)