Cargando…

Stone clearance in lower pole nephrolithiasis after extra corporeal shock wave lithotripsy – the controversy continues

BACKGROUND: To determine factors influencing the clearance of fragments after extra-corporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for lower pole calyceal (LPC) stones. METHODS: In the period between July 1998 and Oct 2001, 100 patients with isolated lower polar calyceal calculi ≤ 20 mm, in patients aged ≥...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ather, M Hammad, Abid, Fuad, Akhtar, Sobia, Khawaja, Karim
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC150011/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12546707
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2490-3-1
_version_ 1782120641037598720
author Ather, M Hammad
Abid, Fuad
Akhtar, Sobia
Khawaja, Karim
author_facet Ather, M Hammad
Abid, Fuad
Akhtar, Sobia
Khawaja, Karim
author_sort Ather, M Hammad
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To determine factors influencing the clearance of fragments after extra-corporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for lower pole calyceal (LPC) stones. METHODS: In the period between July 1998 and Oct 2001, 100 patients with isolated lower polar calyceal calculi ≤ 20 mm, in patients aged ≥ 14 years, were included in the study. Intravenous urograms (IVU) were reviewed to define the LPC anatomy (width of the infundibulum and pelvicalyceal angle). Study end points i.e. stone free status; number of shock waves used and number of sessions were correlated with variables like LPC anatomy, body mass index and stone size. RESULTS: At three months follow up the clearance for stone size ≤ 10 mm, 11–15 mm and 16–20 mm were 95, 96 and 90% respectively. Patients with acute LPC (<90°) and obtuse angle (>90°) had stone clearance of 94 and 100% respectively. For the infundibular width of < 4 mm, the stone clearance was 93% were as for > 4 mm, it was 100%. For body mass index (BMI) less than and > 30 kg/m(2), the stone clearance was 92 and 95% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There is a trend towards more ESWL sessions and shock wave requirement in patients with acute pelvi-calyceal angle and narrow infundibulum but it is not statistically significant. Size (≤ 20 mm) and BMI has no relation with stone clearance. With modern lithotripter, stones up to 20 mm could primarily be treated by ESWL, irrespective of an un-favorable lower polar calyceal anatomy and body habitus.
format Text
id pubmed-150011
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2003
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-1500112003-02-25 Stone clearance in lower pole nephrolithiasis after extra corporeal shock wave lithotripsy – the controversy continues Ather, M Hammad Abid, Fuad Akhtar, Sobia Khawaja, Karim BMC Urol Research Article BACKGROUND: To determine factors influencing the clearance of fragments after extra-corporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for lower pole calyceal (LPC) stones. METHODS: In the period between July 1998 and Oct 2001, 100 patients with isolated lower polar calyceal calculi ≤ 20 mm, in patients aged ≥ 14 years, were included in the study. Intravenous urograms (IVU) were reviewed to define the LPC anatomy (width of the infundibulum and pelvicalyceal angle). Study end points i.e. stone free status; number of shock waves used and number of sessions were correlated with variables like LPC anatomy, body mass index and stone size. RESULTS: At three months follow up the clearance for stone size ≤ 10 mm, 11–15 mm and 16–20 mm were 95, 96 and 90% respectively. Patients with acute LPC (<90°) and obtuse angle (>90°) had stone clearance of 94 and 100% respectively. For the infundibular width of < 4 mm, the stone clearance was 93% were as for > 4 mm, it was 100%. For body mass index (BMI) less than and > 30 kg/m(2), the stone clearance was 92 and 95% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There is a trend towards more ESWL sessions and shock wave requirement in patients with acute pelvi-calyceal angle and narrow infundibulum but it is not statistically significant. Size (≤ 20 mm) and BMI has no relation with stone clearance. With modern lithotripter, stones up to 20 mm could primarily be treated by ESWL, irrespective of an un-favorable lower polar calyceal anatomy and body habitus. BioMed Central 2003-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC150011/ /pubmed/12546707 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2490-3-1 Text en Copyright © 2003 Ather et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ather, M Hammad
Abid, Fuad
Akhtar, Sobia
Khawaja, Karim
Stone clearance in lower pole nephrolithiasis after extra corporeal shock wave lithotripsy – the controversy continues
title Stone clearance in lower pole nephrolithiasis after extra corporeal shock wave lithotripsy – the controversy continues
title_full Stone clearance in lower pole nephrolithiasis after extra corporeal shock wave lithotripsy – the controversy continues
title_fullStr Stone clearance in lower pole nephrolithiasis after extra corporeal shock wave lithotripsy – the controversy continues
title_full_unstemmed Stone clearance in lower pole nephrolithiasis after extra corporeal shock wave lithotripsy – the controversy continues
title_short Stone clearance in lower pole nephrolithiasis after extra corporeal shock wave lithotripsy – the controversy continues
title_sort stone clearance in lower pole nephrolithiasis after extra corporeal shock wave lithotripsy – the controversy continues
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC150011/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12546707
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2490-3-1
work_keys_str_mv AT athermhammad stoneclearanceinlowerpolenephrolithiasisafterextracorporealshockwavelithotripsythecontroversycontinues
AT abidfuad stoneclearanceinlowerpolenephrolithiasisafterextracorporealshockwavelithotripsythecontroversycontinues
AT akhtarsobia stoneclearanceinlowerpolenephrolithiasisafterextracorporealshockwavelithotripsythecontroversycontinues
AT khawajakarim stoneclearanceinlowerpolenephrolithiasisafterextracorporealshockwavelithotripsythecontroversycontinues