Cargando…
Stone clearance in lower pole nephrolithiasis after extra corporeal shock wave lithotripsy – the controversy continues
BACKGROUND: To determine factors influencing the clearance of fragments after extra-corporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for lower pole calyceal (LPC) stones. METHODS: In the period between July 1998 and Oct 2001, 100 patients with isolated lower polar calyceal calculi ≤ 20 mm, in patients aged ≥...
Autores principales: | Ather, M Hammad, Abid, Fuad, Akhtar, Sobia, Khawaja, Karim |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2003
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC150011/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12546707 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2490-3-1 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Is an excretory urogram mandatory in patients with small to medium-sized renal and ureteric stones treated by extra corporeal shock wave lithotripsy?
por: Ather, M Hammad, et al.
Publicado: (2004) -
Retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus extra corporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for management of renal stones
por: Chander, Jagdish, et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
Treatment of large proximal ureteral stones: extra corporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus semi-rigid ureteroscope with lithoclast
por: Tawfick, Ehab R
Publicado: (2010) -
The effect of stone and patient characteristics in predicting extra-corporal shock wave lithotripsy success rate: A cross sectional study
por: Al- zubi, Mohammad, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Lower pole renal stone: flexible ureteroscopy or shockwave lithotripsy? The anatomy is the key
Publicado: (2018)