Cargando…

Views of new internal medicine faculty of their preparedness and competence in physician-patient communication

BACKGROUND: We sought to assess self-rated importance of the medical interview to clinical practice and competence in physician-patient communication among new internal medicine faculty at an academic medical center. METHODS: Since 2001, new internal medicine faculty at the Mayo Clinic College of Me...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mueller, Paul S, Barrier, Patricia A, Call, Timothy G, Duncan, Alan K, Hurley, Daniel L, Multari, Adamarie, Rabatin, Jeffrey T, Li, James TC
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1501016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16729886
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-6-30
_version_ 1782128390339297280
author Mueller, Paul S
Barrier, Patricia A
Call, Timothy G
Duncan, Alan K
Hurley, Daniel L
Multari, Adamarie
Rabatin, Jeffrey T
Li, James TC
author_facet Mueller, Paul S
Barrier, Patricia A
Call, Timothy G
Duncan, Alan K
Hurley, Daniel L
Multari, Adamarie
Rabatin, Jeffrey T
Li, James TC
author_sort Mueller, Paul S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We sought to assess self-rated importance of the medical interview to clinical practice and competence in physician-patient communication among new internal medicine faculty at an academic medical center. METHODS: Since 2001, new internal medicine faculty at the Mayo Clinic College of Medicine (Rochester, Minnesota) have completed a survey on physician-patient communication. The survey asks the new faculty to rate their overall competence in medical interviewing, the importance of the medical interview to their practice, their confidence and adequacy of previous training in handling eight frequently encountered challenging communication scenarios, and whether they would benefit from additional communication training. RESULTS: Between 2001 and 2004, 75 general internists and internal medicine subspecialists were appointed to the faculty, and of these, 58 (77%) completed the survey. The faculty rated (on a 10-point scale) the importance of the medical interview higher than their competence in interviewing; this difference was significant (average ± SD, 9.4 ± 1.0 vs 7.7 ± 1.2, P < .001). Similar results were obtained by sex, age, specialty, years since residency or fellowship training, and perceived benefit of training. Experienced faculty rated their competence in medical interviewing and the importance of the medical interview higher than recent graduates (ie, less than one year since training). For each challenging communication scenario, the new faculty rated the adequacy of their previous training in handling the scenario relatively low. A majority (57%) said they would benefit from additional communication training. CONCLUSION: Although new internal medicine faculty rate high the importance of the medical interview, they rate their competence and adequacy of previous training in medical interviewing relatively low, and many indicate that they would benefit from additional communication training. These results should encourage academic medical centers to make curricula in physician-patient communication available to their faculty members because many of them not only care for patients, but also teach clinical skills, including communication skills, to trainees.
format Text
id pubmed-1501016
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-15010162006-07-13 Views of new internal medicine faculty of their preparedness and competence in physician-patient communication Mueller, Paul S Barrier, Patricia A Call, Timothy G Duncan, Alan K Hurley, Daniel L Multari, Adamarie Rabatin, Jeffrey T Li, James TC BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: We sought to assess self-rated importance of the medical interview to clinical practice and competence in physician-patient communication among new internal medicine faculty at an academic medical center. METHODS: Since 2001, new internal medicine faculty at the Mayo Clinic College of Medicine (Rochester, Minnesota) have completed a survey on physician-patient communication. The survey asks the new faculty to rate their overall competence in medical interviewing, the importance of the medical interview to their practice, their confidence and adequacy of previous training in handling eight frequently encountered challenging communication scenarios, and whether they would benefit from additional communication training. RESULTS: Between 2001 and 2004, 75 general internists and internal medicine subspecialists were appointed to the faculty, and of these, 58 (77%) completed the survey. The faculty rated (on a 10-point scale) the importance of the medical interview higher than their competence in interviewing; this difference was significant (average ± SD, 9.4 ± 1.0 vs 7.7 ± 1.2, P < .001). Similar results were obtained by sex, age, specialty, years since residency or fellowship training, and perceived benefit of training. Experienced faculty rated their competence in medical interviewing and the importance of the medical interview higher than recent graduates (ie, less than one year since training). For each challenging communication scenario, the new faculty rated the adequacy of their previous training in handling the scenario relatively low. A majority (57%) said they would benefit from additional communication training. CONCLUSION: Although new internal medicine faculty rate high the importance of the medical interview, they rate their competence and adequacy of previous training in medical interviewing relatively low, and many indicate that they would benefit from additional communication training. These results should encourage academic medical centers to make curricula in physician-patient communication available to their faculty members because many of them not only care for patients, but also teach clinical skills, including communication skills, to trainees. BioMed Central 2006-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC1501016/ /pubmed/16729886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-6-30 Text en Copyright © 2006 Mueller et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mueller, Paul S
Barrier, Patricia A
Call, Timothy G
Duncan, Alan K
Hurley, Daniel L
Multari, Adamarie
Rabatin, Jeffrey T
Li, James TC
Views of new internal medicine faculty of their preparedness and competence in physician-patient communication
title Views of new internal medicine faculty of their preparedness and competence in physician-patient communication
title_full Views of new internal medicine faculty of their preparedness and competence in physician-patient communication
title_fullStr Views of new internal medicine faculty of their preparedness and competence in physician-patient communication
title_full_unstemmed Views of new internal medicine faculty of their preparedness and competence in physician-patient communication
title_short Views of new internal medicine faculty of their preparedness and competence in physician-patient communication
title_sort views of new internal medicine faculty of their preparedness and competence in physician-patient communication
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1501016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16729886
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-6-30
work_keys_str_mv AT muellerpauls viewsofnewinternalmedicinefacultyoftheirpreparednessandcompetenceinphysicianpatientcommunication
AT barrierpatriciaa viewsofnewinternalmedicinefacultyoftheirpreparednessandcompetenceinphysicianpatientcommunication
AT calltimothyg viewsofnewinternalmedicinefacultyoftheirpreparednessandcompetenceinphysicianpatientcommunication
AT duncanalank viewsofnewinternalmedicinefacultyoftheirpreparednessandcompetenceinphysicianpatientcommunication
AT hurleydaniell viewsofnewinternalmedicinefacultyoftheirpreparednessandcompetenceinphysicianpatientcommunication
AT multariadamarie viewsofnewinternalmedicinefacultyoftheirpreparednessandcompetenceinphysicianpatientcommunication
AT rabatinjeffreyt viewsofnewinternalmedicinefacultyoftheirpreparednessandcompetenceinphysicianpatientcommunication
AT lijamestc viewsofnewinternalmedicinefacultyoftheirpreparednessandcompetenceinphysicianpatientcommunication