Cargando…

Accounting for the increase in NSAID expenditure: substitution or leakage?

BACKGROUND: National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidance stated that a new form of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) (selective COX-2 inhibitors) should only be an option for arthritis patients at high risk of a gastro-intestinal (GI) event. Total expenditure on NS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barton, Garry R, Avery, Anthony J, Whynes, David K
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1501056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16737538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-4-9
_version_ 1782128400213737472
author Barton, Garry R
Avery, Anthony J
Whynes, David K
author_facet Barton, Garry R
Avery, Anthony J
Whynes, David K
author_sort Barton, Garry R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidance stated that a new form of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) (selective COX-2 inhibitors) should only be an option for arthritis patients at high risk of a gastro-intestinal (GI) event. Total expenditure on NSAIDs has risen by 57% over five years, to £247 million in 2004. We assess whether this expenditure increase can be accounted for by substitution – an increased prescribing of two (more expensive) selective COX-2 inhibitors (celecoxib and rofecoxib) and a simultaneous equivalent reduction in the prescribing volume of three (cheaper) older NSAIDs (diclofenac, ibuprofen and naproxen). METHODS: Quarterly prescription data was collated from January 1999 to September 2004. Over this period, the level of correlation between the total prescribing volumes for i) celecoxib and rofecoxib, and ii) diclofenac, ibuprofen, and naproxen were compared, the change in total expenditure on the five NSAIDs was also estimated. The latter was apportioned into that which was estimated to have arisen due to i) substitution, and ii) increased NSAID prescription volume. RESULTS: Total prescription volumes for the two NSAID groups were negatively correlated (r = -0.97, p < 0.001). In the last quarter there were 1.23 million prescriptions for celecoxib and rofecoxib, and 0.46 million fewer prescriptions for naproxen, diclofenac, and ibuprofen (than in the first quarter, when celecoxib and rofecoxib were not prescribed). Total expenditure for the five NSAIDs was £32.7 million higher in the last quarter, than the first, £12.2 million of which was estimated to be due to substitution, and £20.4 million due to increased volume. CONCLUSION: The introduction of celecoxib and rofecoxib was associated with a reduction in the prescription volume for naproxen, diclofenac, and ibuprofen. However, overall quarterly prescription volume for these five NSAIDs increased by 0.76 million, and we estimate that quarterly expenditure increased by £20.4 million more than would have been expected if overall NSAID volume had remained constant. This suggests that the prescription of both celecoxib and rofecoxib may have 'leaked' to population groups who would not previously have received an older NSAID.
format Text
id pubmed-1501056
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-15010562006-07-13 Accounting for the increase in NSAID expenditure: substitution or leakage? Barton, Garry R Avery, Anthony J Whynes, David K Cost Eff Resour Alloc Research BACKGROUND: National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidance stated that a new form of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) (selective COX-2 inhibitors) should only be an option for arthritis patients at high risk of a gastro-intestinal (GI) event. Total expenditure on NSAIDs has risen by 57% over five years, to £247 million in 2004. We assess whether this expenditure increase can be accounted for by substitution – an increased prescribing of two (more expensive) selective COX-2 inhibitors (celecoxib and rofecoxib) and a simultaneous equivalent reduction in the prescribing volume of three (cheaper) older NSAIDs (diclofenac, ibuprofen and naproxen). METHODS: Quarterly prescription data was collated from January 1999 to September 2004. Over this period, the level of correlation between the total prescribing volumes for i) celecoxib and rofecoxib, and ii) diclofenac, ibuprofen, and naproxen were compared, the change in total expenditure on the five NSAIDs was also estimated. The latter was apportioned into that which was estimated to have arisen due to i) substitution, and ii) increased NSAID prescription volume. RESULTS: Total prescription volumes for the two NSAID groups were negatively correlated (r = -0.97, p < 0.001). In the last quarter there were 1.23 million prescriptions for celecoxib and rofecoxib, and 0.46 million fewer prescriptions for naproxen, diclofenac, and ibuprofen (than in the first quarter, when celecoxib and rofecoxib were not prescribed). Total expenditure for the five NSAIDs was £32.7 million higher in the last quarter, than the first, £12.2 million of which was estimated to be due to substitution, and £20.4 million due to increased volume. CONCLUSION: The introduction of celecoxib and rofecoxib was associated with a reduction in the prescription volume for naproxen, diclofenac, and ibuprofen. However, overall quarterly prescription volume for these five NSAIDs increased by 0.76 million, and we estimate that quarterly expenditure increased by £20.4 million more than would have been expected if overall NSAID volume had remained constant. This suggests that the prescription of both celecoxib and rofecoxib may have 'leaked' to population groups who would not previously have received an older NSAID. BioMed Central 2006-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC1501056/ /pubmed/16737538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-4-9 Text en Copyright © 2006 Barton et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Barton, Garry R
Avery, Anthony J
Whynes, David K
Accounting for the increase in NSAID expenditure: substitution or leakage?
title Accounting for the increase in NSAID expenditure: substitution or leakage?
title_full Accounting for the increase in NSAID expenditure: substitution or leakage?
title_fullStr Accounting for the increase in NSAID expenditure: substitution or leakage?
title_full_unstemmed Accounting for the increase in NSAID expenditure: substitution or leakage?
title_short Accounting for the increase in NSAID expenditure: substitution or leakage?
title_sort accounting for the increase in nsaid expenditure: substitution or leakage?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1501056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16737538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-4-9
work_keys_str_mv AT bartongarryr accountingfortheincreaseinnsaidexpendituresubstitutionorleakage
AT averyanthonyj accountingfortheincreaseinnsaidexpendituresubstitutionorleakage
AT whynesdavidk accountingfortheincreaseinnsaidexpendituresubstitutionorleakage