Cargando…

Reproducibility of oligonucleotide arrays using small samples

BACKGROUND: Low RNA yields from small tissue samples can limit the use of oligonucleotide microarrays (Affymetrix GeneChips(®)). Methods using less cRNA for hybridization or amplifying the cRNA have been reported to reduce the number of transcripts detected, but the effect on realistic experiments d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McClintick, Jeanette N, Jerome, Ronald E, Nicholson, Charles R, Crabb, David W, Edenberg, Howard J
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC150597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12594857
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-4-4
_version_ 1782120658689327104
author McClintick, Jeanette N
Jerome, Ronald E
Nicholson, Charles R
Crabb, David W
Edenberg, Howard J
author_facet McClintick, Jeanette N
Jerome, Ronald E
Nicholson, Charles R
Crabb, David W
Edenberg, Howard J
author_sort McClintick, Jeanette N
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Low RNA yields from small tissue samples can limit the use of oligonucleotide microarrays (Affymetrix GeneChips(®)). Methods using less cRNA for hybridization or amplifying the cRNA have been reported to reduce the number of transcripts detected, but the effect on realistic experiments designed to detect biological differences has not been analyzed. We systematically explore the effects of using different starting amounts of RNA on the ability to detect differential gene expression. RESULTS: The standard Affymetrix protocol can be used starting with only 2 micrograms of total RNA, with results equivalent to the recommended 10 micrograms. Biological variability is much greater than the technical variability introduced by this change. A simple amplification protocol described here can be used for samples as small as 0.1 micrograms of total RNA. This amplification protocol allows detection of a substantial fraction of the significant differences found using the standard protocol, despite an increase in variability and the 5' truncation of the transcripts, which prevents detection of a subset of genes. CONCLUSIONS: Biological differences in a typical experiment are much greater than differences resulting from technical manipulations in labeling and hybridization. The standard protocol works well with 2 micrograms of RNA, and with minor modifications could allow the use of samples as small as 1 micrograms. For smaller amounts of starting material, down to 0.1 micrograms RNA, differential gene expression can still be detected using the single cycle amplification protocol. Comparisons of groups of four arrays detect many more significant differences than comparisons of three arrays.
format Text
id pubmed-150597
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2003
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-1505972003-03-11 Reproducibility of oligonucleotide arrays using small samples McClintick, Jeanette N Jerome, Ronald E Nicholson, Charles R Crabb, David W Edenberg, Howard J BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: Low RNA yields from small tissue samples can limit the use of oligonucleotide microarrays (Affymetrix GeneChips(®)). Methods using less cRNA for hybridization or amplifying the cRNA have been reported to reduce the number of transcripts detected, but the effect on realistic experiments designed to detect biological differences has not been analyzed. We systematically explore the effects of using different starting amounts of RNA on the ability to detect differential gene expression. RESULTS: The standard Affymetrix protocol can be used starting with only 2 micrograms of total RNA, with results equivalent to the recommended 10 micrograms. Biological variability is much greater than the technical variability introduced by this change. A simple amplification protocol described here can be used for samples as small as 0.1 micrograms of total RNA. This amplification protocol allows detection of a substantial fraction of the significant differences found using the standard protocol, despite an increase in variability and the 5' truncation of the transcripts, which prevents detection of a subset of genes. CONCLUSIONS: Biological differences in a typical experiment are much greater than differences resulting from technical manipulations in labeling and hybridization. The standard protocol works well with 2 micrograms of RNA, and with minor modifications could allow the use of samples as small as 1 micrograms. For smaller amounts of starting material, down to 0.1 micrograms RNA, differential gene expression can still be detected using the single cycle amplification protocol. Comparisons of groups of four arrays detect many more significant differences than comparisons of three arrays. BioMed Central 2003-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC150597/ /pubmed/12594857 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-4-4 Text en Copyright © 2003 McClintick et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.
spellingShingle Research Article
McClintick, Jeanette N
Jerome, Ronald E
Nicholson, Charles R
Crabb, David W
Edenberg, Howard J
Reproducibility of oligonucleotide arrays using small samples
title Reproducibility of oligonucleotide arrays using small samples
title_full Reproducibility of oligonucleotide arrays using small samples
title_fullStr Reproducibility of oligonucleotide arrays using small samples
title_full_unstemmed Reproducibility of oligonucleotide arrays using small samples
title_short Reproducibility of oligonucleotide arrays using small samples
title_sort reproducibility of oligonucleotide arrays using small samples
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC150597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12594857
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-4-4
work_keys_str_mv AT mcclintickjeanetten reproducibilityofoligonucleotidearraysusingsmallsamples
AT jeromeronalde reproducibilityofoligonucleotidearraysusingsmallsamples
AT nicholsoncharlesr reproducibilityofoligonucleotidearraysusingsmallsamples
AT crabbdavidw reproducibilityofoligonucleotidearraysusingsmallsamples
AT edenberghowardj reproducibilityofoligonucleotidearraysusingsmallsamples