Cargando…
Policy challenges from the "White" Senate inquiry into workplace-related health impacts of toxic dusts and nanoparticles
On 22 June 2005 the Senate of the Commonwealth of Australia voted to establish an inquiry into workplace harm related to toxic dust and emerging technologies (including nanoparticles). The inquiry became known as the "White" Inquiry after Mr Richard White, a financially uncompensated suffe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1513237/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16780594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-8462-3-7 |
_version_ | 1782128464744153088 |
---|---|
author | Faunce, Thomas A Walters, Haydn Williams, Trevor Bryant, David Jennings, Martin Musk, Bill |
author_facet | Faunce, Thomas A Walters, Haydn Williams, Trevor Bryant, David Jennings, Martin Musk, Bill |
author_sort | Faunce, Thomas A |
collection | PubMed |
description | On 22 June 2005 the Senate of the Commonwealth of Australia voted to establish an inquiry into workplace harm related to toxic dust and emerging technologies (including nanoparticles). The inquiry became known as the "White" Inquiry after Mr Richard White, a financially uncompensated sufferer of industrial sandblasting-induced lung disease who was instrumental in its establishment. The "White" Inquiry delivered its final report and recommendations on 31 May 2006. This paper examines whether these recommendations and their implementation may provide a unique opportunity not only to modernize relevant monitoring standards and processes, but related compensation systems for disease associated with workplace-related exposure to toxic dusts. It critically analyzes the likely role of the new Australian Safety and Compensation Council (ASCC) in this area. It also considers whether recommendations related to potential workplace related harm from exposure to nanoparticles could commence a major shift in Australian healthcare regulation. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1513237 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-15132372006-07-20 Policy challenges from the "White" Senate inquiry into workplace-related health impacts of toxic dusts and nanoparticles Faunce, Thomas A Walters, Haydn Williams, Trevor Bryant, David Jennings, Martin Musk, Bill Aust New Zealand Health Policy Debate On 22 June 2005 the Senate of the Commonwealth of Australia voted to establish an inquiry into workplace harm related to toxic dust and emerging technologies (including nanoparticles). The inquiry became known as the "White" Inquiry after Mr Richard White, a financially uncompensated sufferer of industrial sandblasting-induced lung disease who was instrumental in its establishment. The "White" Inquiry delivered its final report and recommendations on 31 May 2006. This paper examines whether these recommendations and their implementation may provide a unique opportunity not only to modernize relevant monitoring standards and processes, but related compensation systems for disease associated with workplace-related exposure to toxic dusts. It critically analyzes the likely role of the new Australian Safety and Compensation Council (ASCC) in this area. It also considers whether recommendations related to potential workplace related harm from exposure to nanoparticles could commence a major shift in Australian healthcare regulation. BioMed Central 2006-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC1513237/ /pubmed/16780594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-8462-3-7 Text en Copyright © 2006 Faunce et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Debate Faunce, Thomas A Walters, Haydn Williams, Trevor Bryant, David Jennings, Martin Musk, Bill Policy challenges from the "White" Senate inquiry into workplace-related health impacts of toxic dusts and nanoparticles |
title | Policy challenges from the "White" Senate inquiry into workplace-related health impacts of toxic dusts and nanoparticles |
title_full | Policy challenges from the "White" Senate inquiry into workplace-related health impacts of toxic dusts and nanoparticles |
title_fullStr | Policy challenges from the "White" Senate inquiry into workplace-related health impacts of toxic dusts and nanoparticles |
title_full_unstemmed | Policy challenges from the "White" Senate inquiry into workplace-related health impacts of toxic dusts and nanoparticles |
title_short | Policy challenges from the "White" Senate inquiry into workplace-related health impacts of toxic dusts and nanoparticles |
title_sort | policy challenges from the "white" senate inquiry into workplace-related health impacts of toxic dusts and nanoparticles |
topic | Debate |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1513237/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16780594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-8462-3-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fauncethomasa policychallengesfromthewhitesenateinquiryintoworkplacerelatedhealthimpactsoftoxicdustsandnanoparticles AT waltershaydn policychallengesfromthewhitesenateinquiryintoworkplacerelatedhealthimpactsoftoxicdustsandnanoparticles AT williamstrevor policychallengesfromthewhitesenateinquiryintoworkplacerelatedhealthimpactsoftoxicdustsandnanoparticles AT bryantdavid policychallengesfromthewhitesenateinquiryintoworkplacerelatedhealthimpactsoftoxicdustsandnanoparticles AT jenningsmartin policychallengesfromthewhitesenateinquiryintoworkplacerelatedhealthimpactsoftoxicdustsandnanoparticles AT muskbill policychallengesfromthewhitesenateinquiryintoworkplacerelatedhealthimpactsoftoxicdustsandnanoparticles |