Cargando…

Policy challenges from the "White" Senate inquiry into workplace-related health impacts of toxic dusts and nanoparticles

On 22 June 2005 the Senate of the Commonwealth of Australia voted to establish an inquiry into workplace harm related to toxic dust and emerging technologies (including nanoparticles). The inquiry became known as the "White" Inquiry after Mr Richard White, a financially uncompensated suffe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Faunce, Thomas A, Walters, Haydn, Williams, Trevor, Bryant, David, Jennings, Martin, Musk, Bill
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1513237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16780594
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-8462-3-7
_version_ 1782128464744153088
author Faunce, Thomas A
Walters, Haydn
Williams, Trevor
Bryant, David
Jennings, Martin
Musk, Bill
author_facet Faunce, Thomas A
Walters, Haydn
Williams, Trevor
Bryant, David
Jennings, Martin
Musk, Bill
author_sort Faunce, Thomas A
collection PubMed
description On 22 June 2005 the Senate of the Commonwealth of Australia voted to establish an inquiry into workplace harm related to toxic dust and emerging technologies (including nanoparticles). The inquiry became known as the "White" Inquiry after Mr Richard White, a financially uncompensated sufferer of industrial sandblasting-induced lung disease who was instrumental in its establishment. The "White" Inquiry delivered its final report and recommendations on 31 May 2006. This paper examines whether these recommendations and their implementation may provide a unique opportunity not only to modernize relevant monitoring standards and processes, but related compensation systems for disease associated with workplace-related exposure to toxic dusts. It critically analyzes the likely role of the new Australian Safety and Compensation Council (ASCC) in this area. It also considers whether recommendations related to potential workplace related harm from exposure to nanoparticles could commence a major shift in Australian healthcare regulation.
format Text
id pubmed-1513237
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-15132372006-07-20 Policy challenges from the "White" Senate inquiry into workplace-related health impacts of toxic dusts and nanoparticles Faunce, Thomas A Walters, Haydn Williams, Trevor Bryant, David Jennings, Martin Musk, Bill Aust New Zealand Health Policy Debate On 22 June 2005 the Senate of the Commonwealth of Australia voted to establish an inquiry into workplace harm related to toxic dust and emerging technologies (including nanoparticles). The inquiry became known as the "White" Inquiry after Mr Richard White, a financially uncompensated sufferer of industrial sandblasting-induced lung disease who was instrumental in its establishment. The "White" Inquiry delivered its final report and recommendations on 31 May 2006. This paper examines whether these recommendations and their implementation may provide a unique opportunity not only to modernize relevant monitoring standards and processes, but related compensation systems for disease associated with workplace-related exposure to toxic dusts. It critically analyzes the likely role of the new Australian Safety and Compensation Council (ASCC) in this area. It also considers whether recommendations related to potential workplace related harm from exposure to nanoparticles could commence a major shift in Australian healthcare regulation. BioMed Central 2006-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC1513237/ /pubmed/16780594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-8462-3-7 Text en Copyright © 2006 Faunce et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Debate
Faunce, Thomas A
Walters, Haydn
Williams, Trevor
Bryant, David
Jennings, Martin
Musk, Bill
Policy challenges from the "White" Senate inquiry into workplace-related health impacts of toxic dusts and nanoparticles
title Policy challenges from the "White" Senate inquiry into workplace-related health impacts of toxic dusts and nanoparticles
title_full Policy challenges from the "White" Senate inquiry into workplace-related health impacts of toxic dusts and nanoparticles
title_fullStr Policy challenges from the "White" Senate inquiry into workplace-related health impacts of toxic dusts and nanoparticles
title_full_unstemmed Policy challenges from the "White" Senate inquiry into workplace-related health impacts of toxic dusts and nanoparticles
title_short Policy challenges from the "White" Senate inquiry into workplace-related health impacts of toxic dusts and nanoparticles
title_sort policy challenges from the "white" senate inquiry into workplace-related health impacts of toxic dusts and nanoparticles
topic Debate
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1513237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16780594
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-8462-3-7
work_keys_str_mv AT fauncethomasa policychallengesfromthewhitesenateinquiryintoworkplacerelatedhealthimpactsoftoxicdustsandnanoparticles
AT waltershaydn policychallengesfromthewhitesenateinquiryintoworkplacerelatedhealthimpactsoftoxicdustsandnanoparticles
AT williamstrevor policychallengesfromthewhitesenateinquiryintoworkplacerelatedhealthimpactsoftoxicdustsandnanoparticles
AT bryantdavid policychallengesfromthewhitesenateinquiryintoworkplacerelatedhealthimpactsoftoxicdustsandnanoparticles
AT jenningsmartin policychallengesfromthewhitesenateinquiryintoworkplacerelatedhealthimpactsoftoxicdustsandnanoparticles
AT muskbill policychallengesfromthewhitesenateinquiryintoworkplacerelatedhealthimpactsoftoxicdustsandnanoparticles