Cargando…

Protein–Protein Interactions More Conserved within Species than across Species

Experimental high-throughput studies of protein–protein interactions are beginning to provide enough data for comprehensive computational studies. Today, about ten large data sets, each with thousands of interacting pairs, coarsely sample the interactions in fly, human, worm, and yeast. Another abou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mika, Sven, Rost, Burkhard
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1513270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16854211
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020079
_version_ 1782128472588550144
author Mika, Sven
Rost, Burkhard
author_facet Mika, Sven
Rost, Burkhard
author_sort Mika, Sven
collection PubMed
description Experimental high-throughput studies of protein–protein interactions are beginning to provide enough data for comprehensive computational studies. Today, about ten large data sets, each with thousands of interacting pairs, coarsely sample the interactions in fly, human, worm, and yeast. Another about 55,000 pairs of interacting proteins have been identified by more careful, detailed biochemical experiments. Most interactions are experimentally observed in prokaryotes and simple eukaryotes; very few interactions are observed in higher eukaryotes such as mammals. It is commonly assumed that pathways in mammals can be inferred through homology to model organisms, e.g. the experimental observation that two yeast proteins interact is transferred to infer that the two corresponding proteins in human also interact. Two pairs for which the interaction is conserved are often described as interologs. The goal of this investigation was a large-scale comprehensive analysis of such inferences, i.e. of the evolutionary conservation of interologs. Here, we introduced a novel score for measuring the overlap between protein–protein interaction data sets. This measure appeared to reflect the overall quality of the data and was the basis for our two surprising results from our large-scale analysis. Firstly, homology-based inferences of physical protein–protein interactions appeared far less successful than expected. In fact, such inferences were accurate only for extremely high levels of sequence similarity. Secondly, and most surprisingly, the identification of interacting partners through sequence similarity was significantly more reliable for protein pairs within the same organism than for pairs between species. Our analysis underlined that the discrepancies between different datasets are large, even when using the same type of experiment on the same organism. This reality considerably constrains the power of homology-based transfer of interactions. In particular, the experimental probing of interactions in distant model organisms has to be undertaken with some caution. More comprehensive images of protein–protein networks will require the combination of many high-throughput methods, including in silico inferences and predictions. http://www.rostlab.org/results/2006/ppi_homology/
format Text
id pubmed-1513270
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-15132702006-07-24 Protein–Protein Interactions More Conserved within Species than across Species Mika, Sven Rost, Burkhard PLoS Comput Biol Research Article Experimental high-throughput studies of protein–protein interactions are beginning to provide enough data for comprehensive computational studies. Today, about ten large data sets, each with thousands of interacting pairs, coarsely sample the interactions in fly, human, worm, and yeast. Another about 55,000 pairs of interacting proteins have been identified by more careful, detailed biochemical experiments. Most interactions are experimentally observed in prokaryotes and simple eukaryotes; very few interactions are observed in higher eukaryotes such as mammals. It is commonly assumed that pathways in mammals can be inferred through homology to model organisms, e.g. the experimental observation that two yeast proteins interact is transferred to infer that the two corresponding proteins in human also interact. Two pairs for which the interaction is conserved are often described as interologs. The goal of this investigation was a large-scale comprehensive analysis of such inferences, i.e. of the evolutionary conservation of interologs. Here, we introduced a novel score for measuring the overlap between protein–protein interaction data sets. This measure appeared to reflect the overall quality of the data and was the basis for our two surprising results from our large-scale analysis. Firstly, homology-based inferences of physical protein–protein interactions appeared far less successful than expected. In fact, such inferences were accurate only for extremely high levels of sequence similarity. Secondly, and most surprisingly, the identification of interacting partners through sequence similarity was significantly more reliable for protein pairs within the same organism than for pairs between species. Our analysis underlined that the discrepancies between different datasets are large, even when using the same type of experiment on the same organism. This reality considerably constrains the power of homology-based transfer of interactions. In particular, the experimental probing of interactions in distant model organisms has to be undertaken with some caution. More comprehensive images of protein–protein networks will require the combination of many high-throughput methods, including in silico inferences and predictions. http://www.rostlab.org/results/2006/ppi_homology/ Public Library of Science 2006-07 2006-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC1513270/ /pubmed/16854211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020079 Text en © 2006 Mika and Rost. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mika, Sven
Rost, Burkhard
Protein–Protein Interactions More Conserved within Species than across Species
title Protein–Protein Interactions More Conserved within Species than across Species
title_full Protein–Protein Interactions More Conserved within Species than across Species
title_fullStr Protein–Protein Interactions More Conserved within Species than across Species
title_full_unstemmed Protein–Protein Interactions More Conserved within Species than across Species
title_short Protein–Protein Interactions More Conserved within Species than across Species
title_sort protein–protein interactions more conserved within species than across species
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1513270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16854211
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020079
work_keys_str_mv AT mikasven proteinproteininteractionsmoreconservedwithinspeciesthanacrossspecies
AT rostburkhard proteinproteininteractionsmoreconservedwithinspeciesthanacrossspecies