Cargando…
Benchmarking pK(a )prediction
BACKGROUND: pK(a )values are a measure of the protonation of ionizable groups in proteins. Ionizable groups are involved in intra-protein, protein-solvent and protein-ligand interactions as well as solubility, protein folding and catalytic activity. The pK(a )shift of a group from its intrinsic valu...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1513386/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16749919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2091-7-18 |
_version_ | 1782128489243082752 |
---|---|
author | Davies, Matthew N Toseland, Christopher P Moss, David S Flower, Darren R |
author_facet | Davies, Matthew N Toseland, Christopher P Moss, David S Flower, Darren R |
author_sort | Davies, Matthew N |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: pK(a )values are a measure of the protonation of ionizable groups in proteins. Ionizable groups are involved in intra-protein, protein-solvent and protein-ligand interactions as well as solubility, protein folding and catalytic activity. The pK(a )shift of a group from its intrinsic value is determined by the perturbation of the residue by the environment and can be calculated from three-dimensional structural data. RESULTS: Here we use a large dataset of experimentally-determined pK(a)s to analyse the performance of different prediction techniques. Our work provides a benchmark of available software implementations: MCCE, MEAD, PROPKA and UHBD. Combinatorial and regression analysis is also used in an attempt to find a consensus approach towards pK(a )prediction. The tendency of individual programs to over- or underpredict the pK(a )value is related to the underlying methodology of the individual programs. CONCLUSION: Overall, PROPKA is more accurate than the other three programs. Key to developing accurate predictive software will be a complete sampling of conformations accessible to protein structures. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1513386 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-15133862006-07-21 Benchmarking pK(a )prediction Davies, Matthew N Toseland, Christopher P Moss, David S Flower, Darren R BMC Biochem Research Article BACKGROUND: pK(a )values are a measure of the protonation of ionizable groups in proteins. Ionizable groups are involved in intra-protein, protein-solvent and protein-ligand interactions as well as solubility, protein folding and catalytic activity. The pK(a )shift of a group from its intrinsic value is determined by the perturbation of the residue by the environment and can be calculated from three-dimensional structural data. RESULTS: Here we use a large dataset of experimentally-determined pK(a)s to analyse the performance of different prediction techniques. Our work provides a benchmark of available software implementations: MCCE, MEAD, PROPKA and UHBD. Combinatorial and regression analysis is also used in an attempt to find a consensus approach towards pK(a )prediction. The tendency of individual programs to over- or underpredict the pK(a )value is related to the underlying methodology of the individual programs. CONCLUSION: Overall, PROPKA is more accurate than the other three programs. Key to developing accurate predictive software will be a complete sampling of conformations accessible to protein structures. BioMed Central 2006-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC1513386/ /pubmed/16749919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2091-7-18 Text en Copyright © 2006 Davies et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Davies, Matthew N Toseland, Christopher P Moss, David S Flower, Darren R Benchmarking pK(a )prediction |
title | Benchmarking pK(a )prediction |
title_full | Benchmarking pK(a )prediction |
title_fullStr | Benchmarking pK(a )prediction |
title_full_unstemmed | Benchmarking pK(a )prediction |
title_short | Benchmarking pK(a )prediction |
title_sort | benchmarking pk(a )prediction |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1513386/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16749919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2091-7-18 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT daviesmatthewn benchmarkingpkaprediction AT toselandchristopherp benchmarkingpkaprediction AT mossdavids benchmarkingpkaprediction AT flowerdarrenr benchmarkingpkaprediction |