Cargando…

A format for databasing and comparison of AFLP fingerprint profiles

BACKGROUND: Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) is a PCR-based technique that involves restriction of genomic DNA followed by ligation of adaptors to the fragments generated and selective PCR amplification of a subset of these fragments. The amplified fragments are separated on a sequencin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hong, Yan, Chuah, Aaron
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC151681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12600280
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-4-7
_version_ 1782120683341348864
author Hong, Yan
Chuah, Aaron
author_facet Hong, Yan
Chuah, Aaron
author_sort Hong, Yan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) is a PCR-based technique that involves restriction of genomic DNA followed by ligation of adaptors to the fragments generated and selective PCR amplification of a subset of these fragments. The amplified fragments are separated on a sequencing gel and visualized by autoradiography or fluorescent sequencing equipment. AFLP allows high-resolution genotyping but the lack of a format for databasing and comparison of AFLP fingerprint profiles limits its wider applications in profiling large numbers of biological samples. RESULTS: A scheme is described to represent a DNA fingerprint profile with a nucleotide sequence-like format in which the information line contains the minimal necessary details to interpret an AFLP DNA fingerprint profile. They include technique used, information on restriction enzymes, primer combination, biological source for DNA materials, fragment sizing and annotation. The bodylines contain information on size and relative intensity of DNA fragments by a string of defined alphabets or symbols. Algorithms for normalizing raw data, binning of fragments and comparing AFLP DNA fingerprint profiles are described. Firstly, the peak heights are normalized against their average and then represented by five symbols according to their relative intensities. Secondly, a binning algorithm based loosely on common springs and rubber bands is applied, which positions sequence fragments into their best possible integer approximations. A BLAST-like reward-penalty concept is used to compare AFLP fingerprint profiles by matching peaks using two metrics: score and percentage of similarity. A software package was developed based on our scheme and proposed algorithms. Example of use this software is given in evaluating novelty of a new tropical orchid cultivar by comparing its AFLP fingerprint profile against those of related commercial cultivars in a database. CONCLUSIONS: AFLP DNA fingerprint profiles can be databased and compared effectively with software developed based on our scheme and algorithms. It will facilitate wider use of this DNA fingerprinting technique in areas such as forensic study, intellectual property protection for biological materials and biodiversity management. Moreover, the same concepts can be applied to databasing and comparing DNA fingerprint profiles obtained with other DNA fingerprint techniques.
format Text
id pubmed-151681
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2003
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-1516812003-03-20 A format for databasing and comparison of AFLP fingerprint profiles Hong, Yan Chuah, Aaron BMC Bioinformatics Research Article BACKGROUND: Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) is a PCR-based technique that involves restriction of genomic DNA followed by ligation of adaptors to the fragments generated and selective PCR amplification of a subset of these fragments. The amplified fragments are separated on a sequencing gel and visualized by autoradiography or fluorescent sequencing equipment. AFLP allows high-resolution genotyping but the lack of a format for databasing and comparison of AFLP fingerprint profiles limits its wider applications in profiling large numbers of biological samples. RESULTS: A scheme is described to represent a DNA fingerprint profile with a nucleotide sequence-like format in which the information line contains the minimal necessary details to interpret an AFLP DNA fingerprint profile. They include technique used, information on restriction enzymes, primer combination, biological source for DNA materials, fragment sizing and annotation. The bodylines contain information on size and relative intensity of DNA fragments by a string of defined alphabets or symbols. Algorithms for normalizing raw data, binning of fragments and comparing AFLP DNA fingerprint profiles are described. Firstly, the peak heights are normalized against their average and then represented by five symbols according to their relative intensities. Secondly, a binning algorithm based loosely on common springs and rubber bands is applied, which positions sequence fragments into their best possible integer approximations. A BLAST-like reward-penalty concept is used to compare AFLP fingerprint profiles by matching peaks using two metrics: score and percentage of similarity. A software package was developed based on our scheme and proposed algorithms. Example of use this software is given in evaluating novelty of a new tropical orchid cultivar by comparing its AFLP fingerprint profile against those of related commercial cultivars in a database. CONCLUSIONS: AFLP DNA fingerprint profiles can be databased and compared effectively with software developed based on our scheme and algorithms. It will facilitate wider use of this DNA fingerprinting technique in areas such as forensic study, intellectual property protection for biological materials and biodiversity management. Moreover, the same concepts can be applied to databasing and comparing DNA fingerprint profiles obtained with other DNA fingerprint techniques. BioMed Central 2003-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC151681/ /pubmed/12600280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-4-7 Text en Copyright © 2003 Hong and Chuah; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hong, Yan
Chuah, Aaron
A format for databasing and comparison of AFLP fingerprint profiles
title A format for databasing and comparison of AFLP fingerprint profiles
title_full A format for databasing and comparison of AFLP fingerprint profiles
title_fullStr A format for databasing and comparison of AFLP fingerprint profiles
title_full_unstemmed A format for databasing and comparison of AFLP fingerprint profiles
title_short A format for databasing and comparison of AFLP fingerprint profiles
title_sort format for databasing and comparison of aflp fingerprint profiles
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC151681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12600280
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-4-7
work_keys_str_mv AT hongyan aformatfordatabasingandcomparisonofaflpfingerprintprofiles
AT chuahaaron aformatfordatabasingandcomparisonofaflpfingerprintprofiles
AT hongyan formatfordatabasingandcomparisonofaflpfingerprintprofiles
AT chuahaaron formatfordatabasingandcomparisonofaflpfingerprintprofiles