Cargando…

Effects of aging on vibration detection thresholds at various body regions

BACKGROUND: The ability to detect sinusoidal vibrations on the skin surface is dependent on the activation of two classes of receptors. The density of such receptors varies across the skin surface and is a factor in determining the sensory acuity of each skin area. However, the acuity of many sensor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stuart, Meg, Turman, A Bulent, Shaw, Jacqueline, Walsh, Natalie, Nguyen, Vincent
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC151682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12600276
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-3-1
_version_ 1782120683573084160
author Stuart, Meg
Turman, A Bulent
Shaw, Jacqueline
Walsh, Natalie
Nguyen, Vincent
author_facet Stuart, Meg
Turman, A Bulent
Shaw, Jacqueline
Walsh, Natalie
Nguyen, Vincent
author_sort Stuart, Meg
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The ability to detect sinusoidal vibrations on the skin surface is dependent on the activation of two classes of receptors. The density of such receptors varies across the skin surface and is a factor in determining the sensory acuity of each skin area. However, the acuity of many sensory systems is known to deteriorate with advancing age. The aim of this study was to determine if vibrotactile sensibility of several skin surfaces deteriorated equally with advancing age. METHODS: Vibration detection thresholds for two frequencies of vibration (30 Hz and 200 Hz) were determined using a method of limits protocol, in two groups of healthy adults, one group aged 17 to 27 years and the other aged 55 to 90 years. Sinusoidal vibrations were generated by a computer and delivered to the skin surface via the probe (diameter = 2 mm) of a mechanical vibrator. Four skin sites (palmar surface of the tip of the middle finger, volar surface of the forearm, lateral aspect of the shoulder, cheek just caudal to the zygoma) were tested. RESULTS: The fingertip was the most sensitive site for vibrotactile detection at both frequencies in a substantial majority of subjects. The older group of subjects showed significantly higher detection thresholds for both frequencies at all sites, except the fingertip, when compared to young subjects. CONCLUSION: The study confirms the deterioration of vibrotactile acuity at several skin sites previously reported in the literature. However, there appears to be no significant reduction in vibrotactile detection at the fingertips in older subjects. This may reflect the high receptor density of this area, or the functional importance of vibrotactile sensibility of the fingertips or some combination of both of these factors.
format Text
id pubmed-151682
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2003
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-1516822003-03-20 Effects of aging on vibration detection thresholds at various body regions Stuart, Meg Turman, A Bulent Shaw, Jacqueline Walsh, Natalie Nguyen, Vincent BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: The ability to detect sinusoidal vibrations on the skin surface is dependent on the activation of two classes of receptors. The density of such receptors varies across the skin surface and is a factor in determining the sensory acuity of each skin area. However, the acuity of many sensory systems is known to deteriorate with advancing age. The aim of this study was to determine if vibrotactile sensibility of several skin surfaces deteriorated equally with advancing age. METHODS: Vibration detection thresholds for two frequencies of vibration (30 Hz and 200 Hz) were determined using a method of limits protocol, in two groups of healthy adults, one group aged 17 to 27 years and the other aged 55 to 90 years. Sinusoidal vibrations were generated by a computer and delivered to the skin surface via the probe (diameter = 2 mm) of a mechanical vibrator. Four skin sites (palmar surface of the tip of the middle finger, volar surface of the forearm, lateral aspect of the shoulder, cheek just caudal to the zygoma) were tested. RESULTS: The fingertip was the most sensitive site for vibrotactile detection at both frequencies in a substantial majority of subjects. The older group of subjects showed significantly higher detection thresholds for both frequencies at all sites, except the fingertip, when compared to young subjects. CONCLUSION: The study confirms the deterioration of vibrotactile acuity at several skin sites previously reported in the literature. However, there appears to be no significant reduction in vibrotactile detection at the fingertips in older subjects. This may reflect the high receptor density of this area, or the functional importance of vibrotactile sensibility of the fingertips or some combination of both of these factors. BioMed Central 2003-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC151682/ /pubmed/12600276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-3-1 Text en Copyright © 2003 Stuart et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.
spellingShingle Research Article
Stuart, Meg
Turman, A Bulent
Shaw, Jacqueline
Walsh, Natalie
Nguyen, Vincent
Effects of aging on vibration detection thresholds at various body regions
title Effects of aging on vibration detection thresholds at various body regions
title_full Effects of aging on vibration detection thresholds at various body regions
title_fullStr Effects of aging on vibration detection thresholds at various body regions
title_full_unstemmed Effects of aging on vibration detection thresholds at various body regions
title_short Effects of aging on vibration detection thresholds at various body regions
title_sort effects of aging on vibration detection thresholds at various body regions
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC151682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12600276
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-3-1
work_keys_str_mv AT stuartmeg effectsofagingonvibrationdetectionthresholdsatvariousbodyregions
AT turmanabulent effectsofagingonvibrationdetectionthresholdsatvariousbodyregions
AT shawjacqueline effectsofagingonvibrationdetectionthresholdsatvariousbodyregions
AT walshnatalie effectsofagingonvibrationdetectionthresholdsatvariousbodyregions
AT nguyenvincent effectsofagingonvibrationdetectionthresholdsatvariousbodyregions