Cargando…

Tobacco and cancer: epidemiology and the laboratory.

Tobacco smoke contains many mutagenic and carcinogenic chemicals. Both whole tobacco smoke and extracts induce tumors in experimental animals. Work with carcinogen-macromolecule adducts provided evidence for the action of specific chemicals. Molecular epidemiology studies suggested that point mutati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vineis, P, Caporaso, N
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 1995
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1518986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7737063
_version_ 1782128562092900352
author Vineis, P
Caporaso, N
author_facet Vineis, P
Caporaso, N
author_sort Vineis, P
collection PubMed
description Tobacco smoke contains many mutagenic and carcinogenic chemicals. Both whole tobacco smoke and extracts induce tumors in experimental animals. Work with carcinogen-macromolecule adducts provided evidence for the action of specific chemicals. Molecular epidemiology studies suggested that point mutations in tumor-suppressor genes (e.g., p53) and oncogenes (e.g., ras) may be specific both for the type of tumor and for the critical environmental exposure. The consistency among investigations on oncogene/tumor-suppressor gene mutations in lung cancer (and other tobacco-related cancers) in smokers is highly suggestive, although we still lack information about the time sequence between exposure, gene mutation, and cancer onset. Current work that deserves emphasis includes investigations revealing that lungs of smokers contain benzo[a]pyrene diol-epoxide-guanine DNA adducts, which are in accordance with the type of mutations found in K-ras or p53 genes (G to T transversions). In addition, DNA in human exfoliated bladder cells showed a derivative of 4-aminobiphenyl as a main adduct; there was also an association between smoking habits (amount and type of tobacco) and the levels of both DNA adducts and hemoglobin adducts formed by aromatic amines. Increasing evidence indicates that genetically based metabolic polymorphisms exert a role in modulating individual susceptibility to the action of tobacco carcinogens. Overall, the weight of evidence strongly supports the causal nature of the association between smoking and cancer and falsifies Fisher's hypothesis that the association was due to confounding by genetic predisposition.
format Text
id pubmed-1518986
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1995
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-15189862006-07-28 Tobacco and cancer: epidemiology and the laboratory. Vineis, P Caporaso, N Environ Health Perspect Research Article Tobacco smoke contains many mutagenic and carcinogenic chemicals. Both whole tobacco smoke and extracts induce tumors in experimental animals. Work with carcinogen-macromolecule adducts provided evidence for the action of specific chemicals. Molecular epidemiology studies suggested that point mutations in tumor-suppressor genes (e.g., p53) and oncogenes (e.g., ras) may be specific both for the type of tumor and for the critical environmental exposure. The consistency among investigations on oncogene/tumor-suppressor gene mutations in lung cancer (and other tobacco-related cancers) in smokers is highly suggestive, although we still lack information about the time sequence between exposure, gene mutation, and cancer onset. Current work that deserves emphasis includes investigations revealing that lungs of smokers contain benzo[a]pyrene diol-epoxide-guanine DNA adducts, which are in accordance with the type of mutations found in K-ras or p53 genes (G to T transversions). In addition, DNA in human exfoliated bladder cells showed a derivative of 4-aminobiphenyl as a main adduct; there was also an association between smoking habits (amount and type of tobacco) and the levels of both DNA adducts and hemoglobin adducts formed by aromatic amines. Increasing evidence indicates that genetically based metabolic polymorphisms exert a role in modulating individual susceptibility to the action of tobacco carcinogens. Overall, the weight of evidence strongly supports the causal nature of the association between smoking and cancer and falsifies Fisher's hypothesis that the association was due to confounding by genetic predisposition. 1995-02 /pmc/articles/PMC1518986/ /pubmed/7737063 Text en
spellingShingle Research Article
Vineis, P
Caporaso, N
Tobacco and cancer: epidemiology and the laboratory.
title Tobacco and cancer: epidemiology and the laboratory.
title_full Tobacco and cancer: epidemiology and the laboratory.
title_fullStr Tobacco and cancer: epidemiology and the laboratory.
title_full_unstemmed Tobacco and cancer: epidemiology and the laboratory.
title_short Tobacco and cancer: epidemiology and the laboratory.
title_sort tobacco and cancer: epidemiology and the laboratory.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1518986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7737063
work_keys_str_mv AT vineisp tobaccoandcancerepidemiologyandthelaboratory
AT caporason tobaccoandcancerepidemiologyandthelaboratory