Cargando…

Design options and methodological fallacies in the studies of reproductive failures.

Reproductive failures are at first sight well suited for epidemiologic research. The time of pregnancy is closely monitored, and failures such as spontaneous abortions and subfecundity are rather frequent. Although epidemiologists' interest in the field has been growing, there is still disappoi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Olsen, J, Skov, T
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 1993
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1519959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8243385
_version_ 1782128762820755456
author Olsen, J
Skov, T
author_facet Olsen, J
Skov, T
author_sort Olsen, J
collection PubMed
description Reproductive failures are at first sight well suited for epidemiologic research. The time of pregnancy is closely monitored, and failures such as spontaneous abortions and subfecundity are rather frequent. Although epidemiologists' interest in the field has been growing, there is still disappointingly little new information of relevance for prevention. A number of methodologic shortcomings may explain this. A large part of disease classification is not well suited for etiologic research, reduced fertility has diminished the populations at risk, close medical monitoring tends to mask causal links, and many scientific problems related to this area bring limitations to the research field. Still, much more could be learned from a systematic use of epidemiologic knowledge, existing registers, and the joint effort between different research groups.
format Text
id pubmed-1519959
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1993
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-15199592006-07-26 Design options and methodological fallacies in the studies of reproductive failures. Olsen, J Skov, T Environ Health Perspect Research Article Reproductive failures are at first sight well suited for epidemiologic research. The time of pregnancy is closely monitored, and failures such as spontaneous abortions and subfecundity are rather frequent. Although epidemiologists' interest in the field has been growing, there is still disappointingly little new information of relevance for prevention. A number of methodologic shortcomings may explain this. A large part of disease classification is not well suited for etiologic research, reduced fertility has diminished the populations at risk, close medical monitoring tends to mask causal links, and many scientific problems related to this area bring limitations to the research field. Still, much more could be learned from a systematic use of epidemiologic knowledge, existing registers, and the joint effort between different research groups. 1993-07 /pmc/articles/PMC1519959/ /pubmed/8243385 Text en
spellingShingle Research Article
Olsen, J
Skov, T
Design options and methodological fallacies in the studies of reproductive failures.
title Design options and methodological fallacies in the studies of reproductive failures.
title_full Design options and methodological fallacies in the studies of reproductive failures.
title_fullStr Design options and methodological fallacies in the studies of reproductive failures.
title_full_unstemmed Design options and methodological fallacies in the studies of reproductive failures.
title_short Design options and methodological fallacies in the studies of reproductive failures.
title_sort design options and methodological fallacies in the studies of reproductive failures.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1519959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8243385
work_keys_str_mv AT olsenj designoptionsandmethodologicalfallaciesinthestudiesofreproductivefailures
AT skovt designoptionsandmethodologicalfallaciesinthestudiesofreproductivefailures