Cargando…

SNP-SNP interactions in breast cancer susceptibility

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer predisposition genes identified to date (e.g., BRCA1 and BRCA2) are responsible for less than 5% of all breast cancer cases. Many studies have shown that the cancer risks associated with individual commonly occurring single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are incremental. H...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Onay, Venüs Ümmiye, Briollais, Laurent, Knight, Julia A, Shi, Ellen, Wang, Yuanyuan, Wells, Sean, Li, Hong, Rajendram, Isaac, Andrulis, Irene L, Ozcelik, Hilmi
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1522021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16672066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-6-114
_version_ 1782128786686345216
author Onay, Venüs Ümmiye
Briollais, Laurent
Knight, Julia A
Shi, Ellen
Wang, Yuanyuan
Wells, Sean
Li, Hong
Rajendram, Isaac
Andrulis, Irene L
Ozcelik, Hilmi
author_facet Onay, Venüs Ümmiye
Briollais, Laurent
Knight, Julia A
Shi, Ellen
Wang, Yuanyuan
Wells, Sean
Li, Hong
Rajendram, Isaac
Andrulis, Irene L
Ozcelik, Hilmi
author_sort Onay, Venüs Ümmiye
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Breast cancer predisposition genes identified to date (e.g., BRCA1 and BRCA2) are responsible for less than 5% of all breast cancer cases. Many studies have shown that the cancer risks associated with individual commonly occurring single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are incremental. However, polygenic models suggest that multiple commonly occurring low to modestly penetrant SNPs of cancer related genes might have a greater effect on a disease when considered in combination. METHODS: In an attempt to identify the breast cancer risk conferred by SNP interactions, we have studied 19 SNPs from genes involved in major cancer related pathways. All SNPs were genotyped by TaqMan 5'nuclease assay. The association between the case-control status and each individual SNP, measured by the odds ratio and its corresponding 95% confidence interval, was estimated using unconditional logistic regression models. At the second stage, two-way interactions were investigated using multivariate logistic models. The robustness of the interactions, which were observed among SNPs with stronger functional evidence, was assessed using a bootstrap approach, and correction for multiple testing based on the false discovery rate (FDR) principle. RESULTS: None of these SNPs contributed to breast cancer risk individually. However, we have demonstrated evidence for gene-gene (SNP-SNP) interaction among these SNPs, which were associated with increased breast cancer risk. Our study suggests cross talk between the SNPs of the DNA repair and immune system (XPD-[Lys751Gln] and IL10-[G(-1082)A]), cell cycle and estrogen metabolism (CCND1-[Pro241Pro] and COMT-[Met108/158Val]), cell cycle and DNA repair (BARD1-[Pro24Ser] and XPD-[Lys751Gln]), and within carcinogen metabolism (GSTP1-[Ile105Val] and COMT-[Met108/158Val]) pathways. CONCLUSION: The importance of these pathways and their communication in breast cancer predisposition has been emphasized previously, but their biological interactions through SNPs have not been described. The strategy used here has the potential to identify complex biological links among breast cancer genes and processes. This will provide novel biological information, which will ultimately improve breast cancer risk management.
format Text
id pubmed-1522021
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-15220212006-07-26 SNP-SNP interactions in breast cancer susceptibility Onay, Venüs Ümmiye Briollais, Laurent Knight, Julia A Shi, Ellen Wang, Yuanyuan Wells, Sean Li, Hong Rajendram, Isaac Andrulis, Irene L Ozcelik, Hilmi BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Breast cancer predisposition genes identified to date (e.g., BRCA1 and BRCA2) are responsible for less than 5% of all breast cancer cases. Many studies have shown that the cancer risks associated with individual commonly occurring single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are incremental. However, polygenic models suggest that multiple commonly occurring low to modestly penetrant SNPs of cancer related genes might have a greater effect on a disease when considered in combination. METHODS: In an attempt to identify the breast cancer risk conferred by SNP interactions, we have studied 19 SNPs from genes involved in major cancer related pathways. All SNPs were genotyped by TaqMan 5'nuclease assay. The association between the case-control status and each individual SNP, measured by the odds ratio and its corresponding 95% confidence interval, was estimated using unconditional logistic regression models. At the second stage, two-way interactions were investigated using multivariate logistic models. The robustness of the interactions, which were observed among SNPs with stronger functional evidence, was assessed using a bootstrap approach, and correction for multiple testing based on the false discovery rate (FDR) principle. RESULTS: None of these SNPs contributed to breast cancer risk individually. However, we have demonstrated evidence for gene-gene (SNP-SNP) interaction among these SNPs, which were associated with increased breast cancer risk. Our study suggests cross talk between the SNPs of the DNA repair and immune system (XPD-[Lys751Gln] and IL10-[G(-1082)A]), cell cycle and estrogen metabolism (CCND1-[Pro241Pro] and COMT-[Met108/158Val]), cell cycle and DNA repair (BARD1-[Pro24Ser] and XPD-[Lys751Gln]), and within carcinogen metabolism (GSTP1-[Ile105Val] and COMT-[Met108/158Val]) pathways. CONCLUSION: The importance of these pathways and their communication in breast cancer predisposition has been emphasized previously, but their biological interactions through SNPs have not been described. The strategy used here has the potential to identify complex biological links among breast cancer genes and processes. This will provide novel biological information, which will ultimately improve breast cancer risk management. BioMed Central 2006-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC1522021/ /pubmed/16672066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-6-114 Text en Copyright © 2006 Onay et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Onay, Venüs Ümmiye
Briollais, Laurent
Knight, Julia A
Shi, Ellen
Wang, Yuanyuan
Wells, Sean
Li, Hong
Rajendram, Isaac
Andrulis, Irene L
Ozcelik, Hilmi
SNP-SNP interactions in breast cancer susceptibility
title SNP-SNP interactions in breast cancer susceptibility
title_full SNP-SNP interactions in breast cancer susceptibility
title_fullStr SNP-SNP interactions in breast cancer susceptibility
title_full_unstemmed SNP-SNP interactions in breast cancer susceptibility
title_short SNP-SNP interactions in breast cancer susceptibility
title_sort snp-snp interactions in breast cancer susceptibility
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1522021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16672066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-6-114
work_keys_str_mv AT onayvenusummiye snpsnpinteractionsinbreastcancersusceptibility
AT briollaislaurent snpsnpinteractionsinbreastcancersusceptibility
AT knightjuliaa snpsnpinteractionsinbreastcancersusceptibility
AT shiellen snpsnpinteractionsinbreastcancersusceptibility
AT wangyuanyuan snpsnpinteractionsinbreastcancersusceptibility
AT wellssean snpsnpinteractionsinbreastcancersusceptibility
AT lihong snpsnpinteractionsinbreastcancersusceptibility
AT rajendramisaac snpsnpinteractionsinbreastcancersusceptibility
AT andrulisirenel snpsnpinteractionsinbreastcancersusceptibility
AT ozcelikhilmi snpsnpinteractionsinbreastcancersusceptibility