Cargando…

Comparative rates of evolution in endosymbiotic nuclear genomes

BACKGROUND: The nucleomorphs associated with secondary plastids of cryptomonads and chlorarachniophytes are the sole examples of organelles with eukaryotic nuclear genomes. Although not as widespread as their prokaryotic equivalents in mitochondria and plastids, nucleomorph genomes share similaritie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patron, Nicola J, Rogers, Matthew B, Keeling, Patrick J
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1523203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16772046
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-6-46
_version_ 1782128799054299136
author Patron, Nicola J
Rogers, Matthew B
Keeling, Patrick J
author_facet Patron, Nicola J
Rogers, Matthew B
Keeling, Patrick J
author_sort Patron, Nicola J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The nucleomorphs associated with secondary plastids of cryptomonads and chlorarachniophytes are the sole examples of organelles with eukaryotic nuclear genomes. Although not as widespread as their prokaryotic equivalents in mitochondria and plastids, nucleomorph genomes share similarities in terms of reduction and compaction. They also differ in several aspects, not least in that they encode proteins that target to the plastid, and so function in a different compartment from that in which they are encoded. RESULTS: Here, we test whether the phylogenetically distinct nucleomorph genomes of the cryptomonad, Guillardia theta, and the chlorarachniophyte, Bigelowiella natans, have experienced similar evolutionary pressures during their transformation to reduced organelles. We compared the evolutionary rates of genes from nuclear, nucleomorph, and plastid genomes, all of which encode proteins that function in the same cellular compartment, the plastid, and are thus subject to similar selection pressures. Furthermore, we investigated the divergence of nucleomorphs within cryptomonads by comparing G. theta and Rhodomonas salina. CONCLUSION: Chlorarachniophyte nucleomorph genes have accumulated errors at a faster rate than other genomes within the same cell, regardless of the compartment where the gene product functions. In contrast, most nucleomorph genes in cryptomonads have evolved faster than genes in other genomes on average, but genes for plastid-targeted proteins are not overly divergent, and it appears that cryptomonad nucleomorphs are not presently evolving rapidly and have therefore stabilized. Overall, these analyses suggest that the forces at work in the two lineages are different, despite the similarities between the structures of their genomes.
format Text
id pubmed-1523203
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-15232032006-07-27 Comparative rates of evolution in endosymbiotic nuclear genomes Patron, Nicola J Rogers, Matthew B Keeling, Patrick J BMC Evol Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: The nucleomorphs associated with secondary plastids of cryptomonads and chlorarachniophytes are the sole examples of organelles with eukaryotic nuclear genomes. Although not as widespread as their prokaryotic equivalents in mitochondria and plastids, nucleomorph genomes share similarities in terms of reduction and compaction. They also differ in several aspects, not least in that they encode proteins that target to the plastid, and so function in a different compartment from that in which they are encoded. RESULTS: Here, we test whether the phylogenetically distinct nucleomorph genomes of the cryptomonad, Guillardia theta, and the chlorarachniophyte, Bigelowiella natans, have experienced similar evolutionary pressures during their transformation to reduced organelles. We compared the evolutionary rates of genes from nuclear, nucleomorph, and plastid genomes, all of which encode proteins that function in the same cellular compartment, the plastid, and are thus subject to similar selection pressures. Furthermore, we investigated the divergence of nucleomorphs within cryptomonads by comparing G. theta and Rhodomonas salina. CONCLUSION: Chlorarachniophyte nucleomorph genes have accumulated errors at a faster rate than other genomes within the same cell, regardless of the compartment where the gene product functions. In contrast, most nucleomorph genes in cryptomonads have evolved faster than genes in other genomes on average, but genes for plastid-targeted proteins are not overly divergent, and it appears that cryptomonad nucleomorphs are not presently evolving rapidly and have therefore stabilized. Overall, these analyses suggest that the forces at work in the two lineages are different, despite the similarities between the structures of their genomes. BioMed Central 2006-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC1523203/ /pubmed/16772046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-6-46 Text en Copyright © 2006 Patron et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Patron, Nicola J
Rogers, Matthew B
Keeling, Patrick J
Comparative rates of evolution in endosymbiotic nuclear genomes
title Comparative rates of evolution in endosymbiotic nuclear genomes
title_full Comparative rates of evolution in endosymbiotic nuclear genomes
title_fullStr Comparative rates of evolution in endosymbiotic nuclear genomes
title_full_unstemmed Comparative rates of evolution in endosymbiotic nuclear genomes
title_short Comparative rates of evolution in endosymbiotic nuclear genomes
title_sort comparative rates of evolution in endosymbiotic nuclear genomes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1523203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16772046
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-6-46
work_keys_str_mv AT patronnicolaj comparativeratesofevolutioninendosymbioticnucleargenomes
AT rogersmatthewb comparativeratesofevolutioninendosymbioticnucleargenomes
AT keelingpatrickj comparativeratesofevolutioninendosymbioticnucleargenomes