Cargando…

The Influence of Injection Rate on the Hypnotic Effect of Propofol during Anesthesia: A Randomized Trial

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies suggested that slow injection of propofol may increase the hypnotic effect during induction of anesthesia. The aim of the present study was therefore to investigate whether injection rate of propofol has an influence on its maximum effect. DESIGN: Randomized, single-blind...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blum, Jasmin, Kochs, Eberhard, Forster, Nicole, Schneider, Gerhard
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1523225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16878179
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pctr.0010017
_version_ 1782128804222730240
author Blum, Jasmin
Kochs, Eberhard
Forster, Nicole
Schneider, Gerhard
author_facet Blum, Jasmin
Kochs, Eberhard
Forster, Nicole
Schneider, Gerhard
author_sort Blum, Jasmin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Previous studies suggested that slow injection of propofol may increase the hypnotic effect during induction of anesthesia. The aim of the present study was therefore to investigate whether injection rate of propofol has an influence on its maximum effect. DESIGN: Randomized, single-blind trial. SETTING: This study has been carried out in the operating rooms of a university hospital. An anesthesiologist and a resident performed the study with the aid of changing nursing staff. PARTICIPANTS: We investigated 99 unpremedicated patients aged 18 to 60 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 1–3. INTERVENTIONS: Anesthesia was induced by intravenous injection of propofol (2 mg/kg). Propofol was manually injected in group 1 over a period of 5 s; in group 2 (120-s injection interval), and in group 3 (240-s injection interval), propofol was administered by an injection pump. After loss of consciousness, mask ventilation was performed with 100% oxygen. Bispectral index (BIS) was used to measure the hypnotic effect of propofol. After the decrease of BIS to the minimum value (i.e., maximum hypnotic effect) and the following increase of BIS to 60, the study period was finished and anesthesia was performed according to clinical criteria. OUTCOME MEASURES: We analyzed whether injection speed has an influence on the maximum hypnotic effect of a given dose of propofol (2 mg/kg). RESULTS: BIS(min) marks the maximum electroencephalogram (EEG) effect of the propofol bolus as measured by the BIS. The lowest mean BIS(min) was measured in group 1 (28.7 ± 10.3). In group 2, BIS(min) was 33.0 (±13.9), and in group 3, BIS(min) was 36.4 (±11.0). There were no significant differences between group 2 and groups 1 or 3, but there were significant differences between groups 1 and 3. In group 1, BIS(min) was reached after 102.91 s (±44.20), in group 2 after 172.33 s (±29.76), and in group 3 after 274.21 s (±45.40). These differences were statistically significant for all comparisons. In summary, the lowest value for BIS(min) was achieved in the group with the fastest rate of propofol injection (group1, 5 s). The highest BIS(min) was obtained in the group with the slowest rate of injection (group 3, 240 s). The hemodynamic parameters were not significantly different among groups. CONCLUSIONS: The hypnotic peak effect of propofol is lower with extremely slow injection (240 s versus 5 s). For clinically usual injection rates (5 s and 120 s), there was no significant difference in propofol peak effect.
format Text
id pubmed-1523225
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-15232252007-04-12 The Influence of Injection Rate on the Hypnotic Effect of Propofol during Anesthesia: A Randomized Trial Blum, Jasmin Kochs, Eberhard Forster, Nicole Schneider, Gerhard PLoS Clin Trials Research Article OBJECTIVE: Previous studies suggested that slow injection of propofol may increase the hypnotic effect during induction of anesthesia. The aim of the present study was therefore to investigate whether injection rate of propofol has an influence on its maximum effect. DESIGN: Randomized, single-blind trial. SETTING: This study has been carried out in the operating rooms of a university hospital. An anesthesiologist and a resident performed the study with the aid of changing nursing staff. PARTICIPANTS: We investigated 99 unpremedicated patients aged 18 to 60 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 1–3. INTERVENTIONS: Anesthesia was induced by intravenous injection of propofol (2 mg/kg). Propofol was manually injected in group 1 over a period of 5 s; in group 2 (120-s injection interval), and in group 3 (240-s injection interval), propofol was administered by an injection pump. After loss of consciousness, mask ventilation was performed with 100% oxygen. Bispectral index (BIS) was used to measure the hypnotic effect of propofol. After the decrease of BIS to the minimum value (i.e., maximum hypnotic effect) and the following increase of BIS to 60, the study period was finished and anesthesia was performed according to clinical criteria. OUTCOME MEASURES: We analyzed whether injection speed has an influence on the maximum hypnotic effect of a given dose of propofol (2 mg/kg). RESULTS: BIS(min) marks the maximum electroencephalogram (EEG) effect of the propofol bolus as measured by the BIS. The lowest mean BIS(min) was measured in group 1 (28.7 ± 10.3). In group 2, BIS(min) was 33.0 (±13.9), and in group 3, BIS(min) was 36.4 (±11.0). There were no significant differences between group 2 and groups 1 or 3, but there were significant differences between groups 1 and 3. In group 1, BIS(min) was reached after 102.91 s (±44.20), in group 2 after 172.33 s (±29.76), and in group 3 after 274.21 s (±45.40). These differences were statistically significant for all comparisons. In summary, the lowest value for BIS(min) was achieved in the group with the fastest rate of propofol injection (group1, 5 s). The highest BIS(min) was obtained in the group with the slowest rate of injection (group 3, 240 s). The hemodynamic parameters were not significantly different among groups. CONCLUSIONS: The hypnotic peak effect of propofol is lower with extremely slow injection (240 s versus 5 s). For clinically usual injection rates (5 s and 120 s), there was no significant difference in propofol peak effect. Public Library of Science 2006-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC1523225/ /pubmed/16878179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pctr.0010017 Text en © 2006 Blum et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Blum, Jasmin
Kochs, Eberhard
Forster, Nicole
Schneider, Gerhard
The Influence of Injection Rate on the Hypnotic Effect of Propofol during Anesthesia: A Randomized Trial
title The Influence of Injection Rate on the Hypnotic Effect of Propofol during Anesthesia: A Randomized Trial
title_full The Influence of Injection Rate on the Hypnotic Effect of Propofol during Anesthesia: A Randomized Trial
title_fullStr The Influence of Injection Rate on the Hypnotic Effect of Propofol during Anesthesia: A Randomized Trial
title_full_unstemmed The Influence of Injection Rate on the Hypnotic Effect of Propofol during Anesthesia: A Randomized Trial
title_short The Influence of Injection Rate on the Hypnotic Effect of Propofol during Anesthesia: A Randomized Trial
title_sort influence of injection rate on the hypnotic effect of propofol during anesthesia: a randomized trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1523225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16878179
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pctr.0010017
work_keys_str_mv AT blumjasmin theinfluenceofinjectionrateonthehypnoticeffectofpropofolduringanesthesiaarandomizedtrial
AT kochseberhard theinfluenceofinjectionrateonthehypnoticeffectofpropofolduringanesthesiaarandomizedtrial
AT forsternicole theinfluenceofinjectionrateonthehypnoticeffectofpropofolduringanesthesiaarandomizedtrial
AT schneidergerhard theinfluenceofinjectionrateonthehypnoticeffectofpropofolduringanesthesiaarandomizedtrial
AT blumjasmin influenceofinjectionrateonthehypnoticeffectofpropofolduringanesthesiaarandomizedtrial
AT kochseberhard influenceofinjectionrateonthehypnoticeffectofpropofolduringanesthesiaarandomizedtrial
AT forsternicole influenceofinjectionrateonthehypnoticeffectofpropofolduringanesthesiaarandomizedtrial
AT schneidergerhard influenceofinjectionrateonthehypnoticeffectofpropofolduringanesthesiaarandomizedtrial