Cargando…
Evaluation of pulse-oximetry oxygen saturation taken through skin protective covering
BACKGROUND: The hard edges of adult finger clip probes of the pulse oximetry oxygen saturation (POOS) monitor can cause skin damage if used for prolonged periods in a neonate. Covering the skin under the probe with Micropore surgical tape or a gauze piece might prevent such injury. The study was don...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1523331/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16677394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-6-14 |
_version_ | 1782128818411012096 |
---|---|
author | James, Jyotsna Tiwari, Lokesh Upadhyay, Pramod Sreenivas, Vishnubhatla Bhambhani, Vikas Puliyel, Jacob M |
author_facet | James, Jyotsna Tiwari, Lokesh Upadhyay, Pramod Sreenivas, Vishnubhatla Bhambhani, Vikas Puliyel, Jacob M |
author_sort | James, Jyotsna |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The hard edges of adult finger clip probes of the pulse oximetry oxygen saturation (POOS) monitor can cause skin damage if used for prolonged periods in a neonate. Covering the skin under the probe with Micropore surgical tape or a gauze piece might prevent such injury. The study was done to see if the protective covering would affect the accuracy of the readings. METHODS: POOS was studied in 50 full-term neonates in the first week of life. After obtaining consent from their parents the neonates had POOS readings taken directly (standard technique) and through the protective covering. Bland-Altman plots were used to compare the new method with the standard technique. A test of repeatability for each method was also performed. RESULTS: The Bland-Altman plots suggest that there is no significant loss of accuracy when readings are taken through the protective covering. The mean difference was 0.06 (SD of 1.39) and 0.04 (SD 1.3) with Micropore and gauze respectively compared to the standard method. The mean difference was 0.22 (SD 0.23) on testing repeatability with the standard method. CONCLUSION: Interposing Micropore or gauze does not significantly affect the accuracy of the POOS reading. The difference between the standard method and the new method was less than the difference seen on testing repeatability of the standard method. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1523331 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-15233312006-07-28 Evaluation of pulse-oximetry oxygen saturation taken through skin protective covering James, Jyotsna Tiwari, Lokesh Upadhyay, Pramod Sreenivas, Vishnubhatla Bhambhani, Vikas Puliyel, Jacob M BMC Pediatr Research Article BACKGROUND: The hard edges of adult finger clip probes of the pulse oximetry oxygen saturation (POOS) monitor can cause skin damage if used for prolonged periods in a neonate. Covering the skin under the probe with Micropore surgical tape or a gauze piece might prevent such injury. The study was done to see if the protective covering would affect the accuracy of the readings. METHODS: POOS was studied in 50 full-term neonates in the first week of life. After obtaining consent from their parents the neonates had POOS readings taken directly (standard technique) and through the protective covering. Bland-Altman plots were used to compare the new method with the standard technique. A test of repeatability for each method was also performed. RESULTS: The Bland-Altman plots suggest that there is no significant loss of accuracy when readings are taken through the protective covering. The mean difference was 0.06 (SD of 1.39) and 0.04 (SD 1.3) with Micropore and gauze respectively compared to the standard method. The mean difference was 0.22 (SD 0.23) on testing repeatability with the standard method. CONCLUSION: Interposing Micropore or gauze does not significantly affect the accuracy of the POOS reading. The difference between the standard method and the new method was less than the difference seen on testing repeatability of the standard method. BioMed Central 2006-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC1523331/ /pubmed/16677394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-6-14 Text en Copyright © 2006 James et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article James, Jyotsna Tiwari, Lokesh Upadhyay, Pramod Sreenivas, Vishnubhatla Bhambhani, Vikas Puliyel, Jacob M Evaluation of pulse-oximetry oxygen saturation taken through skin protective covering |
title | Evaluation of pulse-oximetry oxygen saturation taken through skin protective covering |
title_full | Evaluation of pulse-oximetry oxygen saturation taken through skin protective covering |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of pulse-oximetry oxygen saturation taken through skin protective covering |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of pulse-oximetry oxygen saturation taken through skin protective covering |
title_short | Evaluation of pulse-oximetry oxygen saturation taken through skin protective covering |
title_sort | evaluation of pulse-oximetry oxygen saturation taken through skin protective covering |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1523331/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16677394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-6-14 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jamesjyotsna evaluationofpulseoximetryoxygensaturationtakenthroughskinprotectivecovering AT tiwarilokesh evaluationofpulseoximetryoxygensaturationtakenthroughskinprotectivecovering AT upadhyaypramod evaluationofpulseoximetryoxygensaturationtakenthroughskinprotectivecovering AT sreenivasvishnubhatla evaluationofpulseoximetryoxygensaturationtakenthroughskinprotectivecovering AT bhambhanivikas evaluationofpulseoximetryoxygensaturationtakenthroughskinprotectivecovering AT puliyeljacobm evaluationofpulseoximetryoxygensaturationtakenthroughskinprotectivecovering |