Cargando…

Dataset of manually measured QT intervals in the electrocardiogram

BACKGROUND: The QT interval and the QT dispersion are currently a subject of considerable interest. Cardiac repolarization delay is known to favor the development of arrhythmias. The QT dispersion, defined as the difference between the longest and the shortest QT intervals or as the standard deviati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Christov, Ivaylo, Dotsinsky, Ivan, Simova, Iana, Prokopova, Rada, Trendafilova, Elina, Naydenov, Stefan
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1524770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16707025
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-5-31
_version_ 1782128841656893440
author Christov, Ivaylo
Dotsinsky, Ivan
Simova, Iana
Prokopova, Rada
Trendafilova, Elina
Naydenov, Stefan
author_facet Christov, Ivaylo
Dotsinsky, Ivan
Simova, Iana
Prokopova, Rada
Trendafilova, Elina
Naydenov, Stefan
author_sort Christov, Ivaylo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The QT interval and the QT dispersion are currently a subject of considerable interest. Cardiac repolarization delay is known to favor the development of arrhythmias. The QT dispersion, defined as the difference between the longest and the shortest QT intervals or as the standard deviation of the QT duration in the 12-lead ECG is assumed to be reliable predictor of cardiovascular mortality. The seventh annual PhysioNet/Computers in Cardiology Challenge, 2006 addresses a question of high clinical interest: Can the QT interval be measured by fully automated methods with accuracy acceptable for clinical evaluations? METHOD: The PTB Diagnostic ECG Database was given to 4 cardiologists and 1 biomedical engineer for manual marking of QRS onsets and T-wave ends in 458 recordings. Each recording consisted of one selected beat in lead II, chosen visually to have minimum baseline shift, noise, and artifact. In cases where no T wave could be observed or its amplitude was very small, the referees were instructed to mark a 'group-T-wave end' taking into consideration leads with better manifested T wave. A modified Delphi approach was used, which included up to three rounds of measurements to obtain results closer to the median. RESULTS: A total amount of 2*5*548 Q-onsets and T-wave ends were manually marked during round 1. To obtain closer to the median results, 8.58 % of Q-onsets and 3.21 % of the T-wave ends had to be reviewed during round 2, and 1.50 % Q-onsets and 1.17 % T-wave ends in round 3. The mean and standard deviation of the differences between the values of the referees and the median after round 3 were 2.43 ± 0.96 ms for the Q-onset, and 7.43 ± 3.44 ms for the T-wave end. CONCLUSION: A fully accessible, on the Internet, dataset of manually measured Q-onsets and T-wave ends was created and presented in additional file: 1 (Table 4) with this article. Thus, an available standard can be used for the development of automated methods for the detection of Q-onsets, T-wave ends and for QT interval measurements.
format Text
id pubmed-1524770
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-15247702006-07-29 Dataset of manually measured QT intervals in the electrocardiogram Christov, Ivaylo Dotsinsky, Ivan Simova, Iana Prokopova, Rada Trendafilova, Elina Naydenov, Stefan Biomed Eng Online Research BACKGROUND: The QT interval and the QT dispersion are currently a subject of considerable interest. Cardiac repolarization delay is known to favor the development of arrhythmias. The QT dispersion, defined as the difference between the longest and the shortest QT intervals or as the standard deviation of the QT duration in the 12-lead ECG is assumed to be reliable predictor of cardiovascular mortality. The seventh annual PhysioNet/Computers in Cardiology Challenge, 2006 addresses a question of high clinical interest: Can the QT interval be measured by fully automated methods with accuracy acceptable for clinical evaluations? METHOD: The PTB Diagnostic ECG Database was given to 4 cardiologists and 1 biomedical engineer for manual marking of QRS onsets and T-wave ends in 458 recordings. Each recording consisted of one selected beat in lead II, chosen visually to have minimum baseline shift, noise, and artifact. In cases where no T wave could be observed or its amplitude was very small, the referees were instructed to mark a 'group-T-wave end' taking into consideration leads with better manifested T wave. A modified Delphi approach was used, which included up to three rounds of measurements to obtain results closer to the median. RESULTS: A total amount of 2*5*548 Q-onsets and T-wave ends were manually marked during round 1. To obtain closer to the median results, 8.58 % of Q-onsets and 3.21 % of the T-wave ends had to be reviewed during round 2, and 1.50 % Q-onsets and 1.17 % T-wave ends in round 3. The mean and standard deviation of the differences between the values of the referees and the median after round 3 were 2.43 ± 0.96 ms for the Q-onset, and 7.43 ± 3.44 ms for the T-wave end. CONCLUSION: A fully accessible, on the Internet, dataset of manually measured Q-onsets and T-wave ends was created and presented in additional file: 1 (Table 4) with this article. Thus, an available standard can be used for the development of automated methods for the detection of Q-onsets, T-wave ends and for QT interval measurements. BioMed Central 2006-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC1524770/ /pubmed/16707025 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-5-31 Text en Copyright © 2006 Christov et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Christov, Ivaylo
Dotsinsky, Ivan
Simova, Iana
Prokopova, Rada
Trendafilova, Elina
Naydenov, Stefan
Dataset of manually measured QT intervals in the electrocardiogram
title Dataset of manually measured QT intervals in the electrocardiogram
title_full Dataset of manually measured QT intervals in the electrocardiogram
title_fullStr Dataset of manually measured QT intervals in the electrocardiogram
title_full_unstemmed Dataset of manually measured QT intervals in the electrocardiogram
title_short Dataset of manually measured QT intervals in the electrocardiogram
title_sort dataset of manually measured qt intervals in the electrocardiogram
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1524770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16707025
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-5-31
work_keys_str_mv AT christovivaylo datasetofmanuallymeasuredqtintervalsintheelectrocardiogram
AT dotsinskyivan datasetofmanuallymeasuredqtintervalsintheelectrocardiogram
AT simovaiana datasetofmanuallymeasuredqtintervalsintheelectrocardiogram
AT prokopovarada datasetofmanuallymeasuredqtintervalsintheelectrocardiogram
AT trendafilovaelina datasetofmanuallymeasuredqtintervalsintheelectrocardiogram
AT naydenovstefan datasetofmanuallymeasuredqtintervalsintheelectrocardiogram