Cargando…
Genetic modification and genetic determinism
In this article we examine four objections to the genetic modification of human beings: the freedom argument, the giftedness argument, the authenticity argument, and the uniqueness argument. We then demonstrate that each of these arguments against genetic modification assumes a strong version of gen...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1524970/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16800884 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-5341-1-9 |
_version_ | 1782128868931403776 |
---|---|
author | Resnik, David B Vorhaus, Daniel B |
author_facet | Resnik, David B Vorhaus, Daniel B |
author_sort | Resnik, David B |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this article we examine four objections to the genetic modification of human beings: the freedom argument, the giftedness argument, the authenticity argument, and the uniqueness argument. We then demonstrate that each of these arguments against genetic modification assumes a strong version of genetic determinism. Since these strong deterministic assumptions are false, the arguments against genetic modification, which assume and depend upon these assumptions, are therefore unsound. Serious discussion of the morality of genetic modification, and the development of sound science policy, should be driven by arguments that address the actual consequences of genetic modification for individuals and society, not by ones propped up by false or misleading biological assumptions. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1524970 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-15249702006-08-01 Genetic modification and genetic determinism Resnik, David B Vorhaus, Daniel B Philos Ethics Humanit Med Commentary In this article we examine four objections to the genetic modification of human beings: the freedom argument, the giftedness argument, the authenticity argument, and the uniqueness argument. We then demonstrate that each of these arguments against genetic modification assumes a strong version of genetic determinism. Since these strong deterministic assumptions are false, the arguments against genetic modification, which assume and depend upon these assumptions, are therefore unsound. Serious discussion of the morality of genetic modification, and the development of sound science policy, should be driven by arguments that address the actual consequences of genetic modification for individuals and society, not by ones propped up by false or misleading biological assumptions. BioMed Central 2006-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC1524970/ /pubmed/16800884 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-5341-1-9 Text en Copyright © 2006 Resnik and Vorhaus; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Resnik, David B Vorhaus, Daniel B Genetic modification and genetic determinism |
title | Genetic modification and genetic determinism |
title_full | Genetic modification and genetic determinism |
title_fullStr | Genetic modification and genetic determinism |
title_full_unstemmed | Genetic modification and genetic determinism |
title_short | Genetic modification and genetic determinism |
title_sort | genetic modification and genetic determinism |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1524970/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16800884 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-5341-1-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT resnikdavidb geneticmodificationandgeneticdeterminism AT vorhausdanielb geneticmodificationandgeneticdeterminism |