Cargando…

Genetic modification and genetic determinism

In this article we examine four objections to the genetic modification of human beings: the freedom argument, the giftedness argument, the authenticity argument, and the uniqueness argument. We then demonstrate that each of these arguments against genetic modification assumes a strong version of gen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Resnik, David B, Vorhaus, Daniel B
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1524970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16800884
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-5341-1-9
_version_ 1782128868931403776
author Resnik, David B
Vorhaus, Daniel B
author_facet Resnik, David B
Vorhaus, Daniel B
author_sort Resnik, David B
collection PubMed
description In this article we examine four objections to the genetic modification of human beings: the freedom argument, the giftedness argument, the authenticity argument, and the uniqueness argument. We then demonstrate that each of these arguments against genetic modification assumes a strong version of genetic determinism. Since these strong deterministic assumptions are false, the arguments against genetic modification, which assume and depend upon these assumptions, are therefore unsound. Serious discussion of the morality of genetic modification, and the development of sound science policy, should be driven by arguments that address the actual consequences of genetic modification for individuals and society, not by ones propped up by false or misleading biological assumptions.
format Text
id pubmed-1524970
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-15249702006-08-01 Genetic modification and genetic determinism Resnik, David B Vorhaus, Daniel B Philos Ethics Humanit Med Commentary In this article we examine four objections to the genetic modification of human beings: the freedom argument, the giftedness argument, the authenticity argument, and the uniqueness argument. We then demonstrate that each of these arguments against genetic modification assumes a strong version of genetic determinism. Since these strong deterministic assumptions are false, the arguments against genetic modification, which assume and depend upon these assumptions, are therefore unsound. Serious discussion of the morality of genetic modification, and the development of sound science policy, should be driven by arguments that address the actual consequences of genetic modification for individuals and society, not by ones propped up by false or misleading biological assumptions. BioMed Central 2006-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC1524970/ /pubmed/16800884 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-5341-1-9 Text en Copyright © 2006 Resnik and Vorhaus; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Commentary
Resnik, David B
Vorhaus, Daniel B
Genetic modification and genetic determinism
title Genetic modification and genetic determinism
title_full Genetic modification and genetic determinism
title_fullStr Genetic modification and genetic determinism
title_full_unstemmed Genetic modification and genetic determinism
title_short Genetic modification and genetic determinism
title_sort genetic modification and genetic determinism
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1524970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16800884
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-5341-1-9
work_keys_str_mv AT resnikdavidb geneticmodificationandgeneticdeterminism
AT vorhausdanielb geneticmodificationandgeneticdeterminism