Cargando…

Double blind, randomized controlled trial, to evaluate the effectiveness of a controlled nitric oxide releasing patch versus meglumine antimoniate in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis [NCT00317629]

BACKGROUND: Cutaneous Leishmaniasis is a worldwide disease, endemic in 88 countries, that has shown an increasing incidence over the last two decades. So far, pentavalent antimony compounds have been considered the treatment of choice, with a percentage of cure of about 85%. However, the high effica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Silva, Sandra Y, Rueda, Ligia C, López, Marcos, Vélez, Iván D, Rueda-Clausen, Christian F, Smith, Daniel J, Muñoz, Gerardo, Mosquera, Hernando, Silva, Federico A, Buitrago, Adriana, Díaz, Holger, López-Jaramillo, Patricio
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1524981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16700912
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-7-14
_version_ 1782128871666089984
author Silva, Sandra Y
Rueda, Ligia C
López, Marcos
Vélez, Iván D
Rueda-Clausen, Christian F
Smith, Daniel J
Muñoz, Gerardo
Mosquera, Hernando
Silva, Federico A
Buitrago, Adriana
Díaz, Holger
López-Jaramillo, Patricio
author_facet Silva, Sandra Y
Rueda, Ligia C
López, Marcos
Vélez, Iván D
Rueda-Clausen, Christian F
Smith, Daniel J
Muñoz, Gerardo
Mosquera, Hernando
Silva, Federico A
Buitrago, Adriana
Díaz, Holger
López-Jaramillo, Patricio
author_sort Silva, Sandra Y
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cutaneous Leishmaniasis is a worldwide disease, endemic in 88 countries, that has shown an increasing incidence over the last two decades. So far, pentavalent antimony compounds have been considered the treatment of choice, with a percentage of cure of about 85%. However, the high efficacy of these drugs is counteracted by their many disadvantages and adverse events. Previous studies have shown nitric oxide to be a potential alternative treatment when administered topically with no serious adverse events. However, due to the unstable nitric oxide release, the topical donors needed to be applied frequently, making the adherence to the treatment difficult. The electrospinning technique has allowed the production of a multilayer transdermal patch that produces a continuous and stable nitric oxide release. The main objective of this study is to evaluate this novel nitric oxide topical donor for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis. METHODS AND DESIGN: A double-blind, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled clinical trial, including 620 patients from endemic areas for Leishmaniasis in Colombia was designed to investigate whether this patch is as effective as meglumine antimoniate for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis but with less adverse events. Subjects with ulcers characteristic of cutaneous leishmaniasis will be medically evaluated and laboratory tests and parasitological confirmation performed. After checking the inclusion/exclusion criteria, the patients will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. During 20 days Group 1 will receive simultaneously meglumine antimoniate and placebo of nitric oxide patches while Group 2 will receive placebo of meglumine antimoniate and active nitric oxide patches. During the treatment visits, the medications will be daily administered and the presence of adverse events assessed. During the follow-up, the research group will visit the patients at days 21, 45, 90 and 180. The healing process of the ulcer, the health of the participants, recidivisms and/or reinfection will also be assessed. The evolution of the ulcers will be photographically registered. In case that the effectiveness of the patches is demonstrated, a novel and safe therapeutic alternative for one of the most important public health problems in many countries will be available to patients.
format Text
id pubmed-1524981
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-15249812006-08-01 Double blind, randomized controlled trial, to evaluate the effectiveness of a controlled nitric oxide releasing patch versus meglumine antimoniate in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis [NCT00317629] Silva, Sandra Y Rueda, Ligia C López, Marcos Vélez, Iván D Rueda-Clausen, Christian F Smith, Daniel J Muñoz, Gerardo Mosquera, Hernando Silva, Federico A Buitrago, Adriana Díaz, Holger López-Jaramillo, Patricio Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Cutaneous Leishmaniasis is a worldwide disease, endemic in 88 countries, that has shown an increasing incidence over the last two decades. So far, pentavalent antimony compounds have been considered the treatment of choice, with a percentage of cure of about 85%. However, the high efficacy of these drugs is counteracted by their many disadvantages and adverse events. Previous studies have shown nitric oxide to be a potential alternative treatment when administered topically with no serious adverse events. However, due to the unstable nitric oxide release, the topical donors needed to be applied frequently, making the adherence to the treatment difficult. The electrospinning technique has allowed the production of a multilayer transdermal patch that produces a continuous and stable nitric oxide release. The main objective of this study is to evaluate this novel nitric oxide topical donor for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis. METHODS AND DESIGN: A double-blind, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled clinical trial, including 620 patients from endemic areas for Leishmaniasis in Colombia was designed to investigate whether this patch is as effective as meglumine antimoniate for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis but with less adverse events. Subjects with ulcers characteristic of cutaneous leishmaniasis will be medically evaluated and laboratory tests and parasitological confirmation performed. After checking the inclusion/exclusion criteria, the patients will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. During 20 days Group 1 will receive simultaneously meglumine antimoniate and placebo of nitric oxide patches while Group 2 will receive placebo of meglumine antimoniate and active nitric oxide patches. During the treatment visits, the medications will be daily administered and the presence of adverse events assessed. During the follow-up, the research group will visit the patients at days 21, 45, 90 and 180. The healing process of the ulcer, the health of the participants, recidivisms and/or reinfection will also be assessed. The evolution of the ulcers will be photographically registered. In case that the effectiveness of the patches is demonstrated, a novel and safe therapeutic alternative for one of the most important public health problems in many countries will be available to patients. BioMed Central 2006-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC1524981/ /pubmed/16700912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-7-14 Text en Copyright © 2006 Silva et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Silva, Sandra Y
Rueda, Ligia C
López, Marcos
Vélez, Iván D
Rueda-Clausen, Christian F
Smith, Daniel J
Muñoz, Gerardo
Mosquera, Hernando
Silva, Federico A
Buitrago, Adriana
Díaz, Holger
López-Jaramillo, Patricio
Double blind, randomized controlled trial, to evaluate the effectiveness of a controlled nitric oxide releasing patch versus meglumine antimoniate in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis [NCT00317629]
title Double blind, randomized controlled trial, to evaluate the effectiveness of a controlled nitric oxide releasing patch versus meglumine antimoniate in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis [NCT00317629]
title_full Double blind, randomized controlled trial, to evaluate the effectiveness of a controlled nitric oxide releasing patch versus meglumine antimoniate in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis [NCT00317629]
title_fullStr Double blind, randomized controlled trial, to evaluate the effectiveness of a controlled nitric oxide releasing patch versus meglumine antimoniate in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis [NCT00317629]
title_full_unstemmed Double blind, randomized controlled trial, to evaluate the effectiveness of a controlled nitric oxide releasing patch versus meglumine antimoniate in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis [NCT00317629]
title_short Double blind, randomized controlled trial, to evaluate the effectiveness of a controlled nitric oxide releasing patch versus meglumine antimoniate in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis [NCT00317629]
title_sort double blind, randomized controlled trial, to evaluate the effectiveness of a controlled nitric oxide releasing patch versus meglumine antimoniate in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis [nct00317629]
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1524981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16700912
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-7-14
work_keys_str_mv AT silvasandray doubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheeffectivenessofacontrollednitricoxidereleasingpatchversusmeglumineantimoniateinthetreatmentofcutaneousleishmaniasisnct00317629
AT ruedaligiac doubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheeffectivenessofacontrollednitricoxidereleasingpatchversusmeglumineantimoniateinthetreatmentofcutaneousleishmaniasisnct00317629
AT lopezmarcos doubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheeffectivenessofacontrollednitricoxidereleasingpatchversusmeglumineantimoniateinthetreatmentofcutaneousleishmaniasisnct00317629
AT velezivand doubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheeffectivenessofacontrollednitricoxidereleasingpatchversusmeglumineantimoniateinthetreatmentofcutaneousleishmaniasisnct00317629
AT ruedaclausenchristianf doubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheeffectivenessofacontrollednitricoxidereleasingpatchversusmeglumineantimoniateinthetreatmentofcutaneousleishmaniasisnct00317629
AT smithdanielj doubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheeffectivenessofacontrollednitricoxidereleasingpatchversusmeglumineantimoniateinthetreatmentofcutaneousleishmaniasisnct00317629
AT munozgerardo doubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheeffectivenessofacontrollednitricoxidereleasingpatchversusmeglumineantimoniateinthetreatmentofcutaneousleishmaniasisnct00317629
AT mosquerahernando doubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheeffectivenessofacontrollednitricoxidereleasingpatchversusmeglumineantimoniateinthetreatmentofcutaneousleishmaniasisnct00317629
AT silvafedericoa doubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheeffectivenessofacontrollednitricoxidereleasingpatchversusmeglumineantimoniateinthetreatmentofcutaneousleishmaniasisnct00317629
AT buitragoadriana doubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheeffectivenessofacontrollednitricoxidereleasingpatchversusmeglumineantimoniateinthetreatmentofcutaneousleishmaniasisnct00317629
AT diazholger doubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheeffectivenessofacontrollednitricoxidereleasingpatchversusmeglumineantimoniateinthetreatmentofcutaneousleishmaniasisnct00317629
AT lopezjaramillopatricio doubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheeffectivenessofacontrollednitricoxidereleasingpatchversusmeglumineantimoniateinthetreatmentofcutaneousleishmaniasisnct00317629